Effect of Bifidobacterium breve M-16V supplementation on faecal bifidobacteria in growth restricted very preterm infants - analysis from a randomised trial

被引:10
|
作者
Patole, Sanjay K. [1 ,2 ]
Keil, Anthony D. [3 ]
Nathan, Elizabeth [4 ,5 ]
Doherty, Dorota [4 ,5 ]
Esvaran, Meera [6 ]
Simmer, Karen N. [1 ,2 ]
Conway, Patricia [6 ]
机构
[1] King Edward Mem Hosp Women, Dept Neonatal Paediat, 374 Bagot Rd, Perth, WA 6008, Australia
[2] Univ Western Australia, Ctr Neonatal Res & Educ, Perth, WA, Australia
[3] PathWest Lab Med Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
[4] King Edward Mem Hosp Women, Women & Infants Res Fdn, Perth, WA, Australia
[5] Univ Western Australia, Sch Womens & Infants Hlth, Perth, WA, Australia
[6] Univ New South Wales, Ctr Marine Bioinnovat, Sydney, NSW, Australia
来源
关键词
Bifidobacterium breve; growth restriction; preterm; NECROTIZING ENTEROCOLITIS; ORGAN SIZE; COLONIZATION; PROBIOTICS; ECOLOGY; BIRTH;
D O I
10.3109/14767058.2016.1147554
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Gut development, function and colonisation are impaired in animal models of prematurity with intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). The effect of Bifidobacterium breve (B. breve) supplementation on faecal bifidobacteria in small for gestational age (SGA: birth weight<10th centile due to IUGR) preterm infants is not known.Objective: We compared B. breve M-16V supplementation effect on faecal bifidobacteria in preterm (<33 weeks) SGA versus non-SGA infants in the two arms of our randomised controlled trial.Results: There were no baseline differences in the proportion of detectable B. breve counts between SGA versus non-SGA infants [probiotic: 7 (33%) versus 22 (42%), p=0.603; placebo: 1 (6%) versus 1 (2%), p=0.429]. B. breve counts did not differ between SGA and non-SGA infants in response to treatment (p=0.589), after adjusting for baseline count (p<0.001) and treatment allocation (p<0.001). An interaction term between growth status and treatment showed negligible change (p=0.938). Probiotic treated SGA infants reached full feeds earlier than SGA controls (HR 2.00, 95% CI 1.05-3.82, p=0.035): Median (IQR): 16 (12-26) versus 19 (11-25) days, after adjustment for age at starting feeds and gestation<28 weeks.Conclusion: Response to B. breve M-16V supplementation was not significantly different in preterm (<33 weeks) SGA versus non-SGA infants.
引用
收藏
页码:3751 / 3755
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [21] Insights Image for "Effect of prebiotic and probiotic supplementation on neurodevelopment in preterm very low birth weight infants: findings from a meta-analysis"
    Upadhyay, Ravi Prakash
    Taneja, Sunita
    Chowdhury, Ranadip
    Strand, Tor A.
    Bhandari, Nita
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2020, 87 (05) : 969 - 969
  • [22] Identifying effect modifiers of systemic hydrocortisone treatment initiated 7-14 days after birth in ventilated very preterm infants on long-term outcome: secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial
    Halbmeijer, Nienke Marjolein
    Sonnaert, Michel
    Swarte, Renate M.
    Koopman-Esseboom, Corine
    van Stuijvenberg, Margriet
    Mulder-de Tollenaer, Susanne
    Tan, Ratna N. G. B.
    Mohns, Thilo
    Bruneel, Els
    Steiner, Katerina
    Kramer, Boris W.
    Debeer, Anne
    van Weissenbruch, Mirjam M.
    Marechal, Yoann
    Blom, Henry
    Plaskie, Katleen
    Offringa, Martin
    Merkus, Maruschka P.
    Onland, Wes
    Leemhuis, Aleid G.
    van Kaam, Anton H.
    ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD-FETAL AND NEONATAL EDITION, 2024, 109 (02): : 159 - 165