Sensitivity analysis of agent-based models: a new protocol

被引:23
|
作者
Borgonovo, Emanuele [1 ,2 ]
Pangallo, Marco [3 ,4 ]
Rivkin, Jan [5 ]
Rizzo, Leonardo [6 ]
Siggelkow, Nicolaj [7 ]
机构
[1] Bocconi Univ, Dept Decis Sci, Via Roentgen 1, I-20136 Pisa, Italy
[2] Bocconi Univ, BIDSA, Via Roentgen 1, I-20136 Pisa, Italy
[3] St Anna Sch Adv Studies, Inst Econ, I-56127 Milan, Italy
[4] St Anna Sch Adv Studies, Dept EMbeDS, I-56127 Milan, Italy
[5] Harvard Sch Business, 237 Morgan Hall, Boston, MA 02163 USA
[6] Cent European Univ, Dept Network & Data Sci, Quellenstr 51, A-1100 Vienna, Austria
[7] Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Management Dept, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
Agent based modeling; Sensitivity analysis; Design of experiments; Total order sensitivity indices; GARBAGE; DIFFUSION; MARKET; PREDICTION; DESIGN; TRANSMISSION; DECISIONS; KNOWLEDGE; DYNAMICS; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1007/s10588-021-09358-5
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Agent-based models (ABMs) are increasingly used in the management sciences. Though useful, ABMs are often critiqued: it is hard to discern why they produce the results they do and whether other assumptions would yield similar results. To help researchers address such critiques, we propose a systematic approach to conducting sensitivity analyses of ABMs. Our approach deals with a feature that can complicate sensitivity analyses: most ABMs include important non-parametric elements, while most sensitivity analysis methods are designed for parametric elements only. The approach moves from charting out the elements of an ABM through identifying the goal of the sensitivity analysis to specifying a method for the analysis. We focus on four common goals of sensitivity analysis: determining whether results are robust, which elements have the greatest impact on outcomes, how elements interact to shape outcomes, and which direction outcomes move when elements change. For the first three goals, we suggest a combination of randomized finite change indices calculation through a factorial design. For direction of change, we propose a modification of individual conditional expectation (ICE) plots to account for the stochastic nature of the ABM response. We illustrate our approach using the Garbage Can Model, a classic ABM that examines how organizations make decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 94
页数:43
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Graphical analysis of agent-based opinion formation models
    Devia, Carlos Andres
    Giordano, Giulia
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (05):
  • [22] An Overview of Agent-Based Models for Transport Simulation and Analysis
    Huang, Jiangyan
    Cui, Youkai
    Zhang, Lele
    Tong, Weiping
    Shi, Yunyang
    Liu, Zhiyuan
    Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2022, 2022
  • [23] Probabilistic analysis of agent-based opinion formation models
    Devia, Carlos Andres
    Giordano, Giulia
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [24] Statistical analysis of tipping pathways in agent-based models
    Helfmann, Luzie
    Heitzig, Jobst
    Koltai, Peter
    Kurths, Juergen
    Schuette, Christof
    EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL-SPECIAL TOPICS, 2021, 230 (16-17): : 3249 - 3271
  • [25] Probabilistic analysis of agent-based opinion formation models
    Carlos Andres Devia
    Giulia Giordano
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [26] Statistical analysis of tipping pathways in agent-based models
    Luzie Helfmann
    Jobst Heitzig
    Péter Koltai
    Jürgen Kurths
    Christof Schütte
    The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 2021, 230 : 3249 - 3271
  • [27] The econometric analysis of agent-based models in finance: An application
    Li, Youwei
    Donkers, Bas
    Melenberg, Bertrand
    INTELLIGENT DATA ENGINEERING AND AUTOMATED LEARNING - IDEAL 2007, 2007, 4881 : 1081 - +
  • [28] Scalable agent-based simulation - Distributed simulation of agent-based models
    Pawlaszczyk D.
    KI - Künstliche Intelligenz, 2010, 24 (2) : 161 - 163
  • [29] Agent-Based Models and Microsimulation
    Heard, Daniel
    Dent, Gelonia
    Schifeling, Tracy
    Banks, David
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF STATISTICS AND ITS APPLICATION, VOL 2, 2015, 2 : 259 - 272
  • [30] Learning in agent-based models
    Kirman A.
    Eastern Economic Journal, 2011, 37 (1) : 20 - 27