Luteal phase support may improve pregnancy outcomes during intrauterine insemination cycles

被引:28
|
作者
Maher, Mohamed Ahmed [1 ]
机构
[1] Menoufia Univ, Fac Med, Shibin Al Kawm, Egypt
关键词
Intrauterine insemination; Luteal phase support; Ovulation induction; Unexplained infertility; Vaginal progesterone; HUMAN MENOPAUSAL GONADOTROPIN; HUMAN CHORIONIC-GONADOTROPIN; LUTEINIZING-HORMONE; INVITRO FERTILIZATION; OVARIAN STIMULATION; UNEXPLAINED INFERTILITY; VAGINAL PROGESTERONE; OVULATION INDUCTION; RATES; ANTAGONIST;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.03.022
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: To determine the impact of luteal phase support with vaginal progesterone on pregnancy outcomes in infertile couples undergoing intrauterine insemination when recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone was used for ovulation induction. Study design: This prospective randomized study was undertaken at the Infertility Unit, Armed Forces Hospital Southern Region, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and included 71 patients with either primary or secondary infertility who met the inclusion criteria. All 71 patients underwent intrauterine insemination. Thirty-seven were randomized to start with a supported cycle and 34 started with an unsupported cycle. In supported cycles, patients received vaginal progesterone once daily from the day after insemination for 14 days. No progesterone was given during unsupported cycles. For the second cycle, crossover occurred such that women who initially had a supported cycle underwent an unsupported cycle, and vice versa. The cycle types were alternated until the end of the study. The main outcome measures were clinical pregnancy rates and live-birth rates per cycle and per patient. Results: In total, 132 supported cycles and 126 unsupported cycles were performed successfully. The clinical pregnancy rate per patient was higher for supported than unsupported cycles (54.92% vs. 35.21%, respectively; p = 0.016), but the per-cycle difference was not significant (29.54% vs. 19.84%, respectively; p = 0.07). Twenty-five pregnancies in supported cycles and seven pregnancies in unsupported cycles resulted in live births. When these rates were compared per cycle and per patient, significant differences were detected between the cycle types (18.9% and 35.2% vs. 5.5% and 9.8%; p = 0.001 and <0.001, respectively). Conclusion: Luteal phase support with vaginal progesterone improved the success of intrauterine insemination cycles when recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone was used for ovulation induction. Condensation: Luteal phase support may improve pregnancy outcomes during intrauterine insemination cycles, but large multicentre, placebo-controlled, double-blind trials are needed. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 62
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Estradiol supplementation during the luteal phase may improve the pregnancy rate in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles
    Farhi, J
    Weissman, A
    Steinfeld, Z
    Shorer, M
    Nahum, H
    Levran, D
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2000, 73 (04) : 761 - 766
  • [32] Does multifollicular development and number of intermediate follicles contribute to the effect of luteal phase support with vaginal progesterone gel in intrauterine insemination cycles?
    Tokgoz, Vehbi Yavuz
    Sipahi, Mehmet
    Aydin, Yunus
    Tekin, Ahmet Basar
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2020, 36 (01) : 72 - 76
  • [33] Luteal phase support in intrauterine insemination cycles: a prospective randomized study of 300 mg versus 600 mg intravaginal progesterone tablet
    Biberoglu, Ebru H.
    Tanrikulu, Filiz
    Erdem, Mehmet
    Erdem, Ahmet
    Biberoglu, Kutay Omer
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2016, 32 (01) : 55 - 57
  • [34] Factors influencing pregnancy rates in intrauterine insemination cycles
    Guven, Suleyman
    Gunalp, G. Serdar
    Tekin, Yasar
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2008, 53 (04) : 257 - 265
  • [35] COMPARING PREGNANCY OUTCOMES BETWEEN SPORADIC AND SEQUENTIAL INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION (IUI) CYCLES.
    Van Dorn, Chloe Heather
    Ayyar, Archana
    Frye, Kristen
    Jilani, Sameeha
    Gautam, Aishwarya
    Findley, Joseph
    Weinerman, Rachel Susan
    Flyckt, Rebecca
    Kim, Sung Tae
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2024, 122 (04) : E214 - E215
  • [37] The Effect of Baseline Ovarian Cyst on Pregnancy Outcomes in Ovulation Induction/Intrauterine Insemination Cycles
    Bethel, Karen
    Warwar, Rachel
    Thakore, Suruchi
    Hurley, Emily G.
    WOMENS HEALTH REPORTS, 2024, 5 (01): : 75 - 81
  • [38] Does intrauterine saline infusion by intrauterine insemination (IUI) catheter as endometrial injury during IVF cycles improve pregnancy outcomes among patients with recurrent implantation failure?: An RCT
    Salehpour, Saghar
    Zamaniyan, Marzieh
    Saharkhiz, Nasrin
    Modares, Shahrzad Zadeh
    Hosieni, Sedighe
    Seif, Samira
    Malih, Narges
    Rezapoor, Parinaz
    Sohrabi, Mohammad-Reza
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE, 2016, 14 (09) : 583 - 588
  • [39] Luteal phase support after mild ovulation induction with intrauterine insemination: an on-going debate
    Aytac, Pinar Caglar
    Bulgan Kilicdag, Esra
    Haydardedeoglu, Bulent
    Simsek, Erhan
    Cok, Tayfun
    Coban, Gonca
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2016, 32 (07) : 543 - 547
  • [40] PROGESTERONE LUTEAL SUPPORT FOLLOWING OVULATION INDUCTION AND INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION CYCLES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Hill, M. J.
    Whitcomb, B. W.
    Lewis, T. D.
    Levens, E. D.
    DeCherney, A. H.
    Propst, A. M.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 100 (03) : S301 - S301