Non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for detecting crossing renal vessels in infants and young children: comparison with contrast-enhanced angiography and surgical findings

被引:2
|
作者
Sertorio, Fiammetta [1 ,2 ]
Wong, Michela Cing Yu [2 ,3 ]
Incarbone, Veronica [1 ,4 ]
Pistorio, Angela [5 ]
Mattioli, Girolamo [3 ]
Magnano, Gian Michele [1 ]
Damasio, Maria Beatrice [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Genoa, IRCCS Ist Giannina Gaslini, Radiol Dept, Largo Gaslini 5, I-16147 Genoa, Italy
[2] Univ Genoa, Via Balbi 5, I-16126 Genoa, Italy
[3] IRCCS Ist Giannina Gaslini, Pediat Surg Dept, Largo Gaslini 5, I-16147 Genoa, Italy
[4] Univ Insubria, Radiol Dept, Viale Borri 57, Varese, Italy
[5] Univ Genoa, IRCCS Ist Giannina Gaslini, Epidemiol Biostat & Committees Unit, Largo Gaslini 5, I-16147 Genoa, Italy
关键词
Children; Crossing renal vessel; Hydronephrosis; Magnetic resonance angiography; Non-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging; URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION; DENTATE NUCLEUS; PEDIATRIC HYDRONEPHROSIS; SIGNAL INTENSITY; GLOBUS-PALLIDUS; MR UROGRAPHY; GADOLINIUM; ARTERY;
D O I
10.1007/s00247-018-4252-3
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
BackgroundKnowing that ureteropelvic junction obstruction is due to a crossing renal vessel is essential in choosing the appropriate surgical treatment.ObjectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of non-contrast magnetic resonance (MR) angiography in identifying crossing renal vessels in children younger than 4 years old with unilateral hydronephrosis.Materials and methodsA retrospective review of preoperative MR urography of children with unilateral hydronephrosis was conducted by two independent readers. The presence or absence of crossing renal vessels was identified and compared with surgical findings.ResultsTwenty-nine patients were included. The disagreement between MR angiography with and without contrast enhancement in detecting a crossing renal vessel was 8%. The disagreement between non-contrast-enhanced MR and surgical findings was 17%. The disagreement between contrast-enhanced MR angiography and surgical findings was 25%. The balanced triggered angiography without contrast enhancement had a sensitivity of 70% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 35-93%) and a specificity of 93% (95% CI: 66-100%). Contrast-enhanced MR angiography had a sensitivity of 56% (95% CI: 21-86%) and a specificity of 91%. (95% CI: 59-100%).ConclusionMR without contrast enhancement may be a reliable, valid and safe alternative to contrast-enhanced MR angiography for identifying crossing renal vessels.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 113
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for detecting crossing renal vessels in infants and young children: comparison with contrast-enhanced angiography and surgical findings
    Fiammetta Sertorio
    Michela Cing Yu Wong
    Veronica Incarbone
    Angela Pistorio
    Girolamo Mattioli
    Gian Michele Magnano
    Maria Beatrice Damasio
    Pediatric Radiology, 2019, 49 : 105 - 113
  • [2] Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for the detection of crossing renal vessels in children with symptomatic ureteropelvic junction obstruction: comparison with operative findings
    Calder, Alistair D.
    Hiorns, Melanie P.
    Abhyankar, Aruna
    Mushtaq, Imran
    Olsen, Oystein E.
    PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2007, 37 (04) : 356 - 361
  • [3] Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for the detection of crossing renal vessels in children with symptomatic ureteropelvic junction obstruction: comparison with operative findings
    Alistair D. Calder
    Melanie P. Hiorns
    Aruna Abhyankar
    Imran Mushtaq
    Oystein E. Olsen
    Pediatric Radiology, 2007, 37 : 356 - 361
  • [4] Non-Contrast-Enhanced and Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Living Donor Liver Vascular Anatomy
    Liao, Chien-Chang
    Chen, Meng-Hsiang
    Yu, Chun-Yen
    Tsang, Leung-Chit Leo
    Chen, Chao-Long
    Hsu, Hsien-Wen
    Lim, Wei-Xiong
    Chuang, Yi-Hsuan
    Huang, Po-Hsun
    Cheng, Yu-Fan
    Ou, Hsin-You
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (02)
  • [5] Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography
    Chandra, Tushar
    Pukenas, Bryan
    Mohan, Suyash
    Melhem, Elias
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2012, 20 (04) : 687 - +
  • [6] Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography
    Vasile, Julie V.
    Newman, Tiffany M.
    Prince, Martin R.
    Rusch, David G.
    Greenspun, David T.
    Allen, Robert J.
    Levine, Joshua L.
    CLINICS IN PLASTIC SURGERY, 2011, 38 (02) : 263 - +
  • [7] Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography
    Roditi, G
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2002, 89 (07) : 817 - 820
  • [8] Non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: techniques and applications
    Blankholm, Anne Dorte
    Ringgaard, Steffen
    EXPERT REVIEW OF CARDIOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2012, 10 (01) : 75 - 88
  • [9] Assessment of Transplant Renal Artery Stenosis with Non-contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography: Comparison with Digital Subtraction Angiography
    Pan, Liang
    Shen, Liwen
    Fan, Min
    Xing, Zhaoyu
    Ding, Jiule
    Du, Yanan
    Guo, Songlin
    Chen, Jie
    Xing, Wei
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2024, 31 (06) : 2405 - 2411
  • [10] CONTRAST-ENHANCED MAGNETIC-RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY
    VOGL, TJ
    HOFFMANN, Y
    MUHLER, A
    FELIX, A
    RADIOLOGE, 1994, 34 (08): : 423 - 429