Direct detonation initiation: A comparison between the critical curvature and critical decay rate models

被引:6
|
作者
Weng, Z. [1 ]
Mevel, R. [1 ]
Huang, Z. [1 ]
Cai, F. [2 ]
Xu, J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Ctr Combust Energy, Sch Vehicle & Mobil, State Key Lab Automot Safety & Energy, 30 Shuang Qing Rd, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Energy & Power Engn, 30 Shuang Qing Rd, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[3] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Aerosp Engn, 30 Shuang Qing Rd, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
关键词
IGNITION;
D O I
10.1063/5.0062506
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
The present study compares the critical initiation energy predicted by the critical curvature (CC) and critical decay rate (CDR) models. To ensure a fair and meaningful comparison between these two theoretical approaches, the Taylor-Sedov blast wave model, which enables us to relate the critical state to the energy of the point source, has been employed in both models. Simplified as well as detailed chemical mechanisms were employed for the comparison. By using the same blast wave model, the ratio of critical initiation energy calculated with the CC and CDR models was found to be one to two orders of magnitude smaller than the results in previous studies. Although the choice of the blast wave model is important, the critical energy predicted by the CC model is invariably larger than the one predicted by the CDR model. This was explained by analyzing the relationship between the shock front radius and decay time, as well as the ignition delay-time around the critical conditions of the two models. It was demonstrated that the critical conditions of the CDR model can be fulfilled more easily than those of the CC model. As a result, the main source of discrepancy between the CDR and CC models is that they adopt different initiation failure mechanisms, namely, curvature for the CC model against unsteadiness for the CDR model. Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Critical energy of bubble detonation wave initiation by a wire explosion
    Pinaev, A. V.
    Kochetkov, I. I.
    COMBUSTION EXPLOSION AND SHOCK WAVES, 2012, 48 (03) : 367 - 373
  • [32] On critical conditions for detonation initiation by shock reflection from obstacles
    Thomas, G
    Ward, SM
    Williams, RL
    Bambrey, RJ
    SHOCK WAVES, 2002, 12 (02) : 111 - 119
  • [33] SIMILARITY AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CONDITIONS FOR INITIATION AND FAILURE OF DETONATION - (REACTION ZONE LENGTH CRITICAL ENERGY)
    EYRING, H
    WALKER, FE
    MA, SM
    COON, N
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA-PHYSICAL SCIENCES, 1980, 77 (05): : 2358 - 2361
  • [34] DECAY-RATE OF CRITICAL FLUCTUATIONS IN STEAM ALONG THE CRITICAL ISOCHORE
    DESMAREST, P
    TUFEU, R
    GARRABOS, Y
    LENEINDRE, B
    CHEMICAL PHYSICS LETTERS, 1987, 142 (05) : 336 - 340
  • [35] A CRITICAL COMPARISON OF METHODS TO MONITOR THE DECAY-RATE OF STRAW IN FIELD SOILS
    HARPER, SHT
    JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1989, 40 (03): : 675 - 683
  • [36] The critical tube diameter and critical energy for direct initiation of detonation in C2H2/N2O/Ar mixtures
    Zhang, Bo
    Ng, Hoi Dick
    Lee, John H. S.
    COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2012, 159 (09) : 2944 - 2953
  • [38] ESTIMATION OF CRITICAL ENERGY OF GAS SYSTEM DETONATION INITIATION ON COMBUSTION DELAYS
    BORISOV, AA
    ZAMANSKII, VM
    LISYANSKII, VV
    SKACHKOV, GI
    TROSHIN, KY
    KHIMICHESKAYA FIZIKA, 1986, 5 (12): : 1683 - 1689
  • [39] Behaviors of high explosive near the critical conditions for shock initiation of detonation
    Kubota, Shiro
    Ogata, Yuji
    Wada, Yuji
    Saburi, Tei
    Nagayama, Kunihito
    EXPLOSION, SHOCK WAVE AND HYPERVELOCITY PHENOMENA IN MATERIALS II, 2008, 566 : 15 - +
  • [40] Critical analysis of decay rate measurement methodology
    Kokurewicz, Lukasz
    Muszynski-Huhajlo, Mateusz
    Miodonski, Stanislaw
    Leoniak, Maciej
    11TH CONFERENCE ON INTERDISCIPLINARY PROBLEMS IN ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ENGINEERING (EKO-DOK 2019), 2019, 100