Stoichiometric control of DNA-grafted colloid self-assembly

被引:46
|
作者
Vo, Thi [1 ]
Venkatasubramanian, Venkat [1 ]
Kumar, Sanat [1 ]
Srinivasan, Babji [2 ]
Pal, Suchetan [1 ,3 ]
Zhang, Yugang [3 ]
Gang, Oleg [3 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Dept Chem Engn, New York, NY 10027 USA
[2] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Chem Engn, Gandhinagar 382424, India
[3] Brookhaven Natl Lab, Ctr Funct Nanomat, Upton, NY 11973 USA
关键词
colloidal interactions; functional particle; superlattice engineering; molecular design; modeling; NUCLEIC-ACID JUNCTIONS; CRYSTALLIZATION; NANOPARTICLES; CRYSTALS; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.1420907112
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
There has been considerable interest in understanding the self-assembly of DNA-grafted nanoparticles into different crystal structures, e.g., CsCl, AlB2, and Cr3Si. Although there are important exceptions, a generally accepted view is that the right stoichiometry of the two building block colloids needs to be mixed to form the desired crystal structure. To incisively probe this issue, we combine experiments and theory on a series of DNA-grafted nanoparticles at varying stoichiometries, including noninteger values. We show that stoichiometry can couple with the geometries of the building blocks to tune the resulting equilibrium crystal morphology. As a concrete example, a stoichiometric ratio of 3:1 typically results in the Cr3Si structure. However, AlB2 can form when appropriate building blocks are used so that the AlB2 standard-state free energy is low enough to overcome the entropic preference for Cr3Si. These situations can also lead to an undesirable phase coexistence between crystal polymorphs. Thus, whereas stoichiometry can be a powerful handle for direct control of lattice formation, care must be taken in its design and selection to avoid polymorph coexistence.
引用
收藏
页码:4982 / 4987
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Hydrophobic interactions control the self-assembly of DNA and cellulose
    Lindman, Bjorn
    Medronho, Bruno
    Alves, Luis
    Norgren, Magnus
    Nordenskiold, Lars
    QUARTERLY REVIEWS OF BIOPHYSICS, 2021, 54
  • [22] Autonomous dynamic control of DNA nanostructure self-assembly
    Leopold N. Green
    Hari K. K. Subramanian
    Vahid Mardanlou
    Jongmin Kim
    Rizal F. Hariadi
    Elisa Franco
    Nature Chemistry, 2019, 11 : 510 - 520
  • [23] Autonomous dynamic control of DNA nanostructure self-assembly
    Green, Leopold N.
    Subramanian, Hari K. K.
    Mardanlou, Vahid
    Kim, Jongmin
    Hariadi, Rizal F.
    Franco, Elisa
    NATURE CHEMISTRY, 2019, 11 (06) : 510 - 520
  • [24] Potential control of DNA self-assembly on gold electrode
    Ge, CW
    Tan, YB
    Liao, JH
    Zhang, Y
    Zhang, HQ
    Gu, N
    CHINESE SCIENCE BULLETIN, 2002, 47 (05): : 370 - 375
  • [25] Engineering and applications of DNA-grafted polymer materials
    Peng, Lu
    Wu, Cuichen Sam
    You, Mingxu
    Han, Da
    Chen, Yan
    Fu, Ting
    Ye, Mao
    Tan, Weihong
    CHEMICAL SCIENCE, 2013, 4 (05) : 1928 - 1938
  • [26] Collective motion and dynamic self-assembly of colloid motors
    Lin, Zhihua
    Gao, Changyong
    Chen, Meiling
    Lin, Xiankun
    He, Qiang
    CURRENT OPINION IN COLLOID & INTERFACE SCIENCE, 2018, 35 : 51 - 58
  • [27] DNA Self-assembly for Nanomedicine
    Chhabra, Rahul
    Sharma, Jaswinder
    Liu, Yan
    Rinker, Sherri
    Yan, Hao
    ADVANCED DRUG DELIVERY REVIEWS, 2010, 62 (06) : 617 - 625
  • [28] Self-assembly of perovskite nanosheet colloid at room temperature
    Toda, K
    Sato, H
    Sugawara, A
    Tokuoka, S
    Uematsu, K
    Sato, M
    ELECTROCERAMICS IN JAPAN VIII, 2006, 301 : 227 - 230
  • [29] Algorithmic self-assembly of DNA
    Winfree, Erik
    2006 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MICROTECHNOLOGIES IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2006, : 9 - 9
  • [30] Nanofabrication by DNA self-assembly
    Li, Hanying
    Carter, Joshua D.
    LaBean, Thomas H.
    MATERIALS TODAY, 2009, 12 (05) : 24 - 32