Consolidative Chemoradiotherapy After Induced Chemotherapy Is an Optimal Regimen for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

被引:5
|
作者
Wu, Lili [1 ]
Zhou, Yuhong [2 ]
Fan, Yue [3 ]
Rao, Shengxiang [4 ]
Ji, Yuan [5 ]
Sun, Jing [1 ]
Li, Tingting [1 ]
Du, Shisuo [1 ]
Guo, Xi [2 ]
Zeng, Zhaochong [1 ]
Lou, Wenhui [6 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Dept Radiotherapy, Zhongshan Hosp, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Dept Med Oncol, Zhongshan Hosp, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, Dept Tradit Chinese Med, Zhongshan Hosp, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Fudan Univ, Dept Radiol, Zhongshan Hosp, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[5] Fudan Univ, Dept Pathol, Zhongshan Hosp, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[6] Fudan Univ, Dept Gen Surg, Zhongshan Hosp, Shanghai, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2020年 / 9卷
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
locally advanced pancreatic cancer; neoadjuvant treatment; chemoradiotherapy; chemotherapy; multidiciplinary treatment; PHASE-II TRIAL; CONCURRENT RADIOTHERAPY; ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; NAB-PACLITAXEL; ORAL S-1; GEMCITABINE; CHEMORADIATION; ADENOCARCINOMA; RADIATION; RESECTION;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2019.01543
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Object: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of consolidative chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) after induced chemotherapy (iCT) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Patients and methods: Patients with LAPC were enrolled from January 2013 to November 2018. In stage one, all patients received iCT. Those without distant metastasis proceeded to stage two, received 50.4 Gy cCRT with S-1 as radiosensitizer. Efficacy and tolerability were evaluated in all patients. Results: Sixty-five patients enrolled into this study and accepted iCT. Eleven (16.9%) patients got early progressions or declined general condition, 1 (1.5%) patient quit the trial after one cycle of iCT. These 12 patients didn't receive cCRT. The remaining 53 (81.5%) patients received cCRT. After cCRT, 4 of 53 (7.5%) patients accepted radical resection. The treatment was well-tolerated. In stage one, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were the most frequent toxicities, the severe toxicity (grade 3 and 4) were 26.2 and 20.0%, respectively. In stage two, fatigue (45.3%) and nausea (41.5%) were the most frequent toxic effects but most were mild. The median overall survival (OS) of whole group was 18.1 months [95% CI, 15.11-21.03 months]. The OS of patients with early progression and patients accepted cCRT were 7.6 months [95% CI, 5.22-10.02 months] and 19.5 months [95% CI, 18.08-20.95 months], respectively (P < 0.001). The PFS of the 53 patients was 10.3 months [95% CI, 8.54-11.96 months] and survival rates at 1- and 2- years were 84.8 and 24.3%, respectively. Conclusion: The current results indicate that iCT is a useful screening method to selecting LAPC patients with less-aggressive biological behavior. cCRT after iCT in patients with LAPC is an optimal treatment. The prognosis of patients who received complete treatment is significantly improved.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy or Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer
    Smithers, B. Mark
    Thomson, Iain
    THORACIC SURGERY CLINICS, 2013, 23 (04) : 509 - +
  • [22] Optimal Timing to Surgery after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
    Sun, Zhifei
    Adam, Mohamed A.
    Kim, Jina
    Shenoi, Mithun
    Migaly, John
    Mantyh, Christopher R.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2016, 222 (04) : 367 - 374
  • [23] Differential effect of concurrent chemotherapy regimen on clinical outcomes of preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer
    Kim, Eunji
    Kim, Kyubo
    Oh, Do Hoon
    Han, Sae-Won
    Kim, Tae-You
    Jung, Seung-Yong
    Park, Kyu Joo
    Kang, Gyeong Hoon
    Chie, Eui Kyu
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2019, 24 (02): : 470 - 478
  • [24] Optimal sequencing of chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced laryngeal cancer
    Shah, Nishant K.
    Qureshi, Muhammad M.
    Dyer, Michael A.
    Patel, Sagar A.
    Kim, Kristine
    Everett, Peter C.
    Grillone, Gregory A.
    Jalisi, Scharukh M.
    Minh Tam Truong
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2019, 129 (10): : 2313 - 2320
  • [25] Stereotactic radiotherapy after chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer
    LE ROY, C.
    Barbe, R.
    Sun, R.
    Burtin, P.
    Gelli, M.
    Deutsch, E.
    Durand-Labrunie, J.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 170 : S1089 - S1089
  • [26] Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Clinical and pathologic downstaging
    Diaz-Gonzalez, J. A.
    Chopitea, A.
    Aristu, J. J.
    Pardo, F.
    Arbea, L.
    Rodriguez, J.
    Viudce, A.
    Rotellar, F.
    Montiel, C.
    Garcia-Foncillas, J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 69 (03): : S288 - S288
  • [27] Chemotherapy Followed by Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Non-metastatic Pancreatic Cancer - A New Paradigm?
    McIntosh, D.
    Shaukat, A.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 22 (05) : 390 - 390
  • [28] Maintenance chemotherapy after chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer
    Mizrahi, Jonathan D.
    Moningi, Shalini
    Nogueras-Gonzalez, Graciela M.
    Wolff, Robert A.
    Javle, Milind M.
    Varadhachary, Gauri R.
    Ho, Linus
    Fogelman, David R.
    Raghav, Kanwal P.
    Overman, Michael J.
    Crane, Christopher H.
    Herman, Joseph M.
    Koong, Albert C.
    Koay, Eugene J.
    Rogers, Jane E.
    Pant, Shubham
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 79 (24)
  • [29] Chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a retrospective cohort study
    Maruki, Y.
    Ueno, H.
    Sasaki, M.
    Sakamoto, Y.
    Kondo, S.
    Morizane, C.
    Ito, Y.
    Okusaka, T.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2016, 27 : 35 - 35
  • [30] Chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy in borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma
    Argalacsova, Sona
    Vocka, Michal
    Petruzelka, Lubos
    Ryska, Miroslav
    Zaruba, Pavel
    Krska, Zdenek
    Fryba, Vladimir
    Ulrych, Jan
    Cerny, Vladimir
    Tuma, Tomas
    Hoskovec, David
    NEOPLASMA, 2023, 70 (03) : 468 - 475