Safety and efficacy of azelastine nasal spray (Astelin NS) for seasonal allergic rhinitis: A 4-week comparative multicenter trial

被引:56
|
作者
LaForce, C
Dockhorn, RJ
Prenner, BM
Chu, TJ
Kraemer, MJ
Widlitz, MD
DEletto, TA
Freitag, JJ
机构
[1] IMMUNOALLERGY TECH CONSULTANTS INC,PRAIRIE VILLAGE,KS
[2] ALLERGY ASSOCIATES MED GRP INC,SAN DIEGO,CA
[3] ALLERGY & ASTHMA ASSOCIATES SANTA CLARA VALLEY,SAN JOSE,CA
[4] SPOKANE ALLERGY & ASTHMA CLIN,SPOKANE,WA
[5] CARTER WALLACE INC,PRINCETON,NJ
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S1081-1206(10)63420-5
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: Azelastine is a chemically novel investigational antiallergy drug with the ability to antagonize the effects of chemical mediators of the early-phase and late-phase allergic responses suggesting its usefulness in the treatment of upper and lower airway diseases. Objective: The objective of this 4-week, double-blind, multicenter trial was to evaluate the efficacy of azelastine nasal spray in subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis. Methods: Two hundred sixty-four subjects 12 years of age and older were randomized to receive either azelastine, 2 sprays/nostril qd; azelastine, 2 sprays/nostril bid; oral chlorpheniramine maleate, 12 mg bid; or placebo. The primary efficacy parameters were the changes in major and total symptom complex severity scores. Results: Overall, across all 4 weeks of treatment, the mean percent improvements in the total and major symptom complex severity scores in both azelastine treatment groups were greater than those for the placebo group. For the azelastine 2 sprays bid group, the overall results were significant at P less than or equal to .05 for the major symptom complex score and at .05 < P less than or equal to .10 for the total symptom complex score versus placebo. For both azelastine treatment groups, improvements in all of the individual rhinitis symptoms were superior to those for the placebo group and, in general were clinically and statistically significant. Azelastine nasal spray was well tolerated; adverse experiences were generally application site reactions, mild to moderate, and not limiting to continued treatment. Conclusions: Azelastine nasal spray demonstrated broad clinical antirhinitis activity that for the 2 sprays/nostril bid dosage regimen was consistently clinically and statistically significant.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 188
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparative safety and efficacy of two formulations of mometasone nasal spray in adult seasonal allergic rhinitis
    Kuna, Piotr
    Wasiak, Wojciech
    Jones, Spencer
    Kreft, Katarina Zajc
    ALLERGY AND ASTHMA PROCEEDINGS, 2014, 35 (04) : 332 - 337
  • [22] Comparison of azelastine nasal spray and oral ebastine in treating seasonal allergic rhinitis
    Hernandez, DJC
    Aqilar, JLP
    Romero, JD
    Baehre, M
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 1995, 13 (06) : 299 - 304
  • [23] Comparative safety of olopatadine,azelastine and placebo nasal sprays in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    Ratner, P.
    Mohar, D.
    Drake, M.
    Whitling, A.
    Montgomery, D.
    Crenshaw, K.
    Wall, G.
    ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2007, 98 (01) : A87 - A87
  • [24] Efficacy and Safety of Azelastine Hydrocloride and Fluticasone Propionate Combined in a Single Nasal Spray Delivery Device in Patients with Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
    Hampel, F.
    Ratner, P.
    Diaz, J.
    Sacks, H.
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2009, 123 (02) : S155 - S155
  • [25] Safety and efficacy of olopatadine hydrochloride nasal spray for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis
    Meltzer, EO
    Hampel, FC
    Ratner, PH
    Bernstein, DI
    Larsen, LV
    Berger, WE
    Finn, AF
    Marple, BF
    Roland, PS
    Wall, GM
    Brubaker, MJ
    Dimas, C
    Potts, SL
    Silver, LH
    Barnes, JR
    ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2005, 95 (06) : 600 - 606
  • [26] Efficacy of Azelastine 0.15% Nasal Spray in Treating Nasal Symptoms of Perennial Allergic Rhinitis
    Bernstein, J.
    Jacobs, J.
    Wheeler, W.
    Sacks, H.
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2010, 125 (02) : AB176 - AB176
  • [27] Efficacy of Azelastine HCl/Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray in the Treatment of Nasal Congestion in Patients with Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR)
    Berger, William E.
    Bernstein, Jonathan A.
    Meltzer, Eli O.
    Ratner, Paul H.
    Ruiz, Nancy
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2015, 135 (02) : AB219 - AB219
  • [28] Azelastine nasal spray: A review of pharmacology and clinical efficacy in allergic and nonallergic rhinitis
    Lieberman, PL
    Settipane, RA
    ALLERGY AND ASTHMA PROCEEDINGS, 2003, 24 (02) : 95 - 105
  • [29] Efficacy of azelastine nasal spray in seasonal allergic rhinitis patients who remain symptomatic after treatment with fexofenadine
    LaForce, CF
    Corren, J
    Wheeler, WJ
    Berger, WE
    ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2004, 93 (02) : 154 - 159
  • [30] 'Regular' versus 'as required' use of azelastine nasal spray in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis
    Passali, D
    Bellussi, L
    Paganelli, II
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY IN ASEAN COUNTRIES, 1997, 51 : 81 - 87