Comparison of dose-response curves for chromosomal aberrations established by chromosome painting and conventional analysis

被引:60
|
作者
Lindholm, C
Luomahaara, S
Koivistoinen, A
Ilus, T
Edwards, AA
Salomaa, S
机构
[1] Radiat & Nucl Safety Author, Res & Environm, FIN-00881 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Natl Radiol Protect Board, Didcot OX11 0RQ, Oxon, England
关键词
D O I
10.1080/095530098141690
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Purpose: To establish Co-60 gamma-ray dose-response curves for dicentrics and translocations visualized by chromosome painting and for dicentrics analysed after conventional solid staining. Materials and methods: Analysis of chromosomal aberrations was performed on peripheral blood lymphocytes obtained from 48 h old cultures of irradiated whole blood. Dicentrics were scored from Giemsa-stained preparations, and bi-coloured dicentrics and translocations after FISH painting of chromosomes 1, 2 and dr. Results: Equal frequencies of complete dicentrics and translocations, where both members of the exchanges were seen, were observed in the chromosome painting analysis at all doses, resulting in similar calibration curves. Due to differences in scoring criteria, dicentrics scored in conventionally Giemsa-stained slides agreed better with data for total than for complete exchanges. Donor differences for translocations at the control level and at low doses were seen and large uncertainty surrounds the linear component of the dose-response for total translocations. Conclusions: Dose reconstruction of past exposures in cases of low doses is very dependent on the linear coefficient of the curve. Results indicate that total translocations would give less reliable dose estimates and therefore complete translocations are preferred.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 34
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Implicit dose-response curves
    Perez Millan, Mercedes
    Dickenstein, Alicia
    JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL BIOLOGY, 2015, 70 (07) : 1669 - 1684
  • [22] INTERPRETATION OF DOSE-RESPONSE CURVES FOR CELL KILLING AND INDUCTION OF CHROMOSOME-ABERRATIONS USING CALKINS ENZYME-KINETIC MODEL
    HOLT, PD
    ROBERTS, CJ
    BAILEY, K
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 1985, 13 (1-4) : 295 - 298
  • [23] Implicit dose-response curves
    Mercedes Pérez Millán
    Alicia Dickenstein
    Journal of Mathematical Biology, 2015, 70 : 1669 - 1684
  • [24] ON DOSE-RESPONSE CURVES AND ANESTHETICS
    WAUD, BE
    WAUD, DR
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1970, 33 (01) : 1 - &
  • [25] BUMETANIDE AND FRUSEMIDE - COMPARISON OF DOSE-RESPONSE CURVES IN HEALTHY MEN
    RAMSAY, LE
    MCINNES, GT
    HETTIARACHCHI, J
    SHELTON, J
    SCOTT, P
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1978, 5 (03) : 243 - 247
  • [26] COMPARISON OF MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS AND APPROXIMATIONS OF RADIOASSAY DOSE-RESPONSE CURVES
    SINTERHAUF, K
    MULLER, T
    SPIRA, HJ
    MULLER, D
    LOMMER, D
    ACTA ENDOCRINOLOGICA, 1975, 78 : 115 - 115
  • [27] ANALYSIS OF DOSE-RESPONSE CURVES IN THE DETECTION OF BRONCHIAL HYPERREACTIVITY
    BELLIA, V
    RIZZO, A
    AMOROSO, S
    MIRABELLA, A
    BONSIGNORE, G
    RESPIRATION, 1983, 44 (01) : 10 - 18
  • [28] COMPARISON OF MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS AND APPROXIMATIONS OF RADIOASSAY DOSE-RESPONSE CURVES
    SINTERHAUF, K
    MULLER, T
    SPIRA, HJ
    MULLER, D
    LOMMER, D
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 1975, 21 (07) : 993 - 993
  • [29] DOSE-RESPONSE CURVES FOR PANCURONIUM AND TUBOCURARINE - COMPARISON OF SINGLE AND CUMULATIVE DOSE TECHNIQUES
    GIBSON, FM
    MIRAKHUR, RK
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 1987, 4 (02) : 143 - 147
  • [30] CHROMOSOME-ABERRATIONS AS A BIOLOGICAL DOSE-RESPONSE INDICATOR OF RADIATION EXPOSURE IN URANIUM MINERS
    BRANDOM, WF
    SACCOMANNO, G
    ARCHER, VE
    ARCHER, PG
    BLOOM, AD
    RADIATION RESEARCH, 1978, 76 (01) : 159 - 171