Detecting influential observations in principal components and common principal components

被引:5
|
作者
Boente, Graciela [1 ,2 ]
Pires, Ana M. [3 ,4 ]
Rodrigues, Isabel M. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Buenos Aires, Fac Ciencias Exactas & Nat, RA-1053 Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[2] Consejo Nacl Invest Cient & Tecn, RA-1033 Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[3] Univ Tecn Lisboa, Inst Super Tecn, Dept Matemat, Lisbon, Portugal
[4] Univ Tecn Lisboa, Inst Super Tecn, CEMAT, Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
Common principal components; Detection of outliers; Influence functions; Robust estimation; OUTLIER IDENTIFICATION; ESTIMATORS; MODEL; PCA;
D O I
10.1016/j.csda.2010.01.001
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Detecting outlying observations is an important step in any analysis, even when robust estimates are used. In particular, the robustified Mahalanobis distance is a natural measure of outlyingness if one focuses on ellipsoidal distributions. However, it is well known that the asymptotic chi-square approximation for the cutoff value of the Mahalanobis distance based on several robust estimates (like the minimum volume ellipsoid, the minimum covariance determinant and the S-estimators) is not adequate for detecting atypical observations in small samples from the normal distribution. In the multi-population setting and under a common principal components model, aggregated measures based on standardized empirical influence functions are used to detect observations with a significant impact on the estimators. As in the one-population setting, the cutoff values obtained from the asymptotic distribution of those aggregated measures are not adequate for small samples. More appropriate cutoff values, adapted to the sample sizes, can be computed by using a cross-validation approach. Cutoff values obtained from a Monte Carlo study using S-estimators are provided for illustration. A real data set is also analyzed. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2967 / 2975
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Principal Dynamical Components
    de la Iglesia, Manuel D.
    Tabak, Esteban G.
    COMMUNICATIONS ON PURE AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2013, 66 (01) : 48 - 82
  • [32] NONLINEAR PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS
    YOHAI, VJ
    ACKERMANN, W
    HAIGH, C
    QUALITY & QUANTITY, 1985, 19 (01) : 53 - 69
  • [33] PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS IN ECONOMETRICS
    OKSANEN, EH
    COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-THEORY AND METHODS, 1988, 17 (08) : 2507 - 2532
  • [34] ROTATION OF PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS
    RICHMAN, MB
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 1986, 6 (03): : 293 - 335
  • [35] Spurious principal components
    Franses, Philip Hans
    Janssens, Eva
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2019, 26 (01) : 37 - 39
  • [36] Stability of principal components
    Al-Ibrahim, A. H.
    Al-Kandari, Noriah M.
    COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS, 2008, 23 (01) : 153 - 171
  • [37] PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS OF IONICITY
    MEISTER, J
    SCHWARZ, WHE
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY, 1994, 98 (33): : 8245 - 8252
  • [38] Simple principal components
    Vines, SK
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES C-APPLIED STATISTICS, 2000, 49 : 441 - 451
  • [39] Principal components of mania
    González-Pinto, A
    Ballesteros, J
    Aldama, A
    de Heredia, JLP
    Gutierrez, M
    Mosquera, F
    González-Pinto, A
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2003, 76 (1-3) : 95 - 102
  • [40] The reliability of principal components
    Lorge, I
    Morrison, N
    SCIENCE, 1938, 87 : 491 - 492