Contraceptive and reproductive risk factors for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in American Indian women

被引:16
|
作者
Schiff, M
Miller, J
Masuk, M
King, LV
Altobelli, KK
Wheeler, CM
Becker, TM
机构
[1] Univ New Mexico, Sch Med, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
[2] Oregon Hlth Sci Univ, Dept Publ Hlth & Prevent Med, Portland, OR 97201 USA
关键词
Indians North American; cross cultural comparison; cervix dysplasia;
D O I
10.1093/ije/29.6.983
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives To evaluate contraceptive and reproductive risk factors for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in southwestern American Indian women. Methods We conducted a clinic-based case-control study. Cases were American Indian women with biopsy-proven CIN I, CIN II or CIN III. Controls were from the same clinics and had normal cervical epithelium. All subjects underwent structured interviews focused on contraceptive and reproductive factors. Laboratory assays included polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based tests for cervical human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. Results We enrolled 628 women in the study. The strongest risk factors for CIN II/III included HPV infection (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 7.9, 95% CI:4.7-13.2), and low income (OR = 3.1, 95% CI : 1.7-5.7). The use of an intrauterine device (IUD) ever (OR = 3.0, 95% CI: 1.4-6.1) and currently (OR = 4.1, 95% CI: 1.1-14.6), and greater than or equal to3 vaginal deliveries (OR = 5.2, 95% CI:2.4-11.1) were associated with CIN II/III. History of infertility was also associated with CIN II/III (OR = 2.1, 95% CI: 1.0-4.2). Conclusions The data suggest that history of infertility, IUD use and vaginal deliveries were associated with CIN among American Indian women.
引用
收藏
页码:983 / 990
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: risk factors for persistence and recurrence in adolescents
    Vetrano, G.
    Lombardi, G.
    Di Leone, G.
    Parisi, A.
    Scardamaglia, P.
    Pate, G.
    Verrico, M.
    Corosu, R.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 28 (03) : 189 - 192
  • [22] Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in young women
    Haidopoulos, D.
    Voulgaris, Z.
    Protopapas, A.
    Rodolakis, A.
    Vlachos, G.
    Tsetsa, P.
    Antsaklis, A.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2007, 27 (07) : 709 - 712
  • [23] Risk factors, diagnosis and prognosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia among HIV-infected women
    Lehtovirta, Paeivi
    Paavonen, Jorma
    Heikinheimo, Oskari
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STD & AIDS, 2008, 19 (01) : 37 - 41
  • [24] Risk factors for cervical dysplasia in southwestern American Indian women.
    Schiff, M
    Becker, T
    Altobelli, K
    Masuk, M
    van Asselt-King, L
    Wheeler, C
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1999, 149 (11) : S54 - S54
  • [25] ORAL-CONTRACEPTIVE USE AND INCIDENCE OF CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA
    GRAM, IT
    MACALUSO, M
    CHURCHILL, J
    STALSBERG, H
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1991, 134 (07) : 761 - 761
  • [26] ORAL-CONTRACEPTIVE USE AND THE INCIDENCE OF CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA
    GRAM, IT
    MACALUSO, M
    STALSBERG, H
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1992, 167 (01) : 40 - 44
  • [27] Analysis of related factors of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia complicated with vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia
    Y.Y. Zhang
    R. Xia
    D. Chen
    X. Zhang
    Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2022, 24 : 902 - 908
  • [28] Risk Factors for Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Women With Genital Dysplasia
    Wald, Anna
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 123 (01): : 183 - 184
  • [29] Risk Factors for Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Women With Genital Dysplasia
    ElNaggar, Adam C.
    Santoso, Joseph T.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 122 (02): : 218 - 223
  • [30] Identification of papillomavirus types and other risk factors for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
    da Silva, Terezinha Tenorio
    Guimaraes, Marilea de Lima
    de Castro Barbosa, Maria Isabel
    Garpar Pinheiro, Maria de Fatima
    Maia, Angelina Farias
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA, 2006, 28 (05): : 285 - 291