Exploring differences in the use of the statin choice decision aid and diabetes medication choice decision aid in primary care

被引:16
|
作者
Ballard, Aimee Yu [1 ]
Kessler, Maya [1 ]
Scheitel, Marianne [2 ]
Montori, Victor M. [3 ,4 ]
Chaudhry, Rajeev [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Med, Div Primary Care Internal Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Knowledge Delivery Ctr, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Knowledge & Evaluat Res Unit, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Div Endocrinol, Dept Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; HEALTH-PROFESSIONALS; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; UPDATE; MELLITUS; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1186/s12911-017-0514-5
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Shared decision making is essential to patient centered care, but can be difficult for busy clinicians to implement into practice. Tools have been developed to aid in shared decision making and embedded in electronic medical records (EMRs) to facilitate use. This study was undertaken to explore the patterns of use and barriers and facilitators to use of two decision aids, the Statin Choice Decision Aid (SCDA) and the Diabetes Medication Choice Decision Aid (DMCDA), in primary care practices where the decision aids are embedded in the EMR. Methods: A survey exploring factors that influenced use of each decision aid was sent to eligible primary care clinicians affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN. Survey data was collected and clinician use of each decision aid via links from the EMR was tracked. Results: The survey response rate was 40% (105/262). Log file data indicated 51% of clinicians used the SCDA and 9% of clinicians used the DMCDA. Reasons for lack of use included lack of knowledge of the EMR link, not finding the decision aids helpful, and time constraints. Survey responses indicated that use of the tool as intended was low, with many clinicians only discussing decision aid topics that they found relevant. Conclusion: Although guidelines for both the treatment of blood cholesterol with a statin and for the treatment of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes recommend shared decision making, tools that facilitate shared decision making are not routinely used even when embedded in the EMR. Even when decision aids are used, their use may not reflect patient centered care.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Chest Pain Choice Decision Aid A Randomized Trial
    Hess, Erik P.
    Knoedler, Meghan A.
    Shah, Nilay D.
    Kline, Jeffrey A.
    Breslin, Maggie
    Branda, Megan E.
    Pencille, Laurie J.
    Asplin, Brent R.
    Nestler, David M.
    Sadosty, Annie T.
    Stiell, Ian G.
    Ting, Henry H.
    Montori, Victor M.
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR QUALITY AND OUTCOMES, 2012, 5 (03): : 251 - 259
  • [22] Protocol for the Osteoporosis Choice trial. A pilot randomized trial of a decision aid in primary care practice
    Pencille, Laurie J.
    Campbell, Megan E.
    Van Houten, Holly K.
    Shah, Nilay D.
    Mullan, Rebecca J.
    Swiglo, Brian A.
    Breslin, Maggie
    Kesman, Rebecca L.
    Tulledge-Scheitel, Sidna M.
    Jaeger, Thomas M.
    Johnson, Ruth E.
    Bartel, Gregory A.
    Wermers, Robert A.
    Melton, L. Joseph, III
    Montori, Victor M.
    TRIALS, 2009, 10
  • [23] Protocol for the Osteoporosis Choice trial. A pilot randomized trial of a decision aid in primary care practice
    Laurie J Pencille
    Megan E Campbell
    Holly K Van Houten
    Nilay D Shah
    Rebecca J Mullan
    Brian A Swiglo
    Maggie Breslin
    Rebecca L Kesman
    Sidna M Tulledge-Scheitel
    Thomas M Jaeger
    Ruth E Johnson
    Gregory A Bartel
    Robert A Wermers
    L Joseph Melton
    Victor M Montori
    Trials, 10
  • [24] 'MY KIDNEYS, MY CHOICE, DECISION AID': SUPPORTING SHARED DECISION MAKING
    Fortnum, Debbie
    Smolonogov, Tatiana
    Walker, Rachael
    Kairaitis, Luke
    Pugh, Debbie
    JOURNAL OF RENAL CARE, 2015, 41 (02) : 81 - 87
  • [25] TRANSLATION INTO PRACTICE OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF DEPRESSION MEDICATIONS: THE DEPRESSION MEDICATION CHOICE DECISION AID TRIAL
    LeBlanc, Annie
    Shah, Nilay
    Herrin, Jeph
    Branda, Megan
    Williams, Mark
    Inselman, Jonathan
    Montori, Victor M.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2014, 29 : S239 - S240
  • [26] Integrated decision-aid system for the choice of surface treatments
    Toussaint, P
    Degrez, M
    Delchambre, A
    COST 516 TRIBOLOGY SYMPOSIUM, 1998, 180 : 441 - 444
  • [27] UROLITHIASIS TREATMENT PREFERENCES AND THE IMPACT OF A DECISION AID ON TREATMENT CHOICE
    Cabri, John
    Lambrechts, Sylvia
    Pollard, Matthew
    Kwan, Lorna
    Zhang, Haoyue
    Pena, Adam
    Brownstein, Daniel
    Liu, Hui
    Chang, Jessica
    Alden, Juliana
    Patel, Nishant
    Dunn, Matthew
    Saigal, Christopher
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (04): : E550 - E550
  • [28] Use of a Decision Aid to Improve Treatment Decisions in Osteoporosis: The Osteoporosis Choice Randomized Trial
    Montori, Victor M.
    Shah, Nilay D.
    Pencille, Laurie J.
    Branda, Megan E.
    Van Houten, Holly K.
    Swiglo, Brian A.
    Kesman, Rebecca L.
    Tulledge-Scheitel, Sidna M.
    Jaeger, Thomas M.
    Johnson, Ruth E.
    Bartel, Gregory A.
    Melton, L. Joseph, III
    Wermers, Robert A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 124 (06): : 549 - 556
  • [29] Towards shared decision-making in consultations: Assessing the feasibility and acceptability of the diabetes medication choice decision aid to facilitate involvement of people with Type 2 diabetes in decisions about medication adjustment
    Forde, I.
    O'Donnell, M.
    Dinneen, S.
    DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2019, 36 : 95 - 96
  • [30] Utilization of the iPad Application: Aid for Decision-making in Occupation Choice
    Tomori, Kounosuke
    Uezu, Sei
    Kinjo, Syota
    Ogahara, Kakuya
    Nagatani, Ryutaro
    Higashi, Toshio
    OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 19 (02) : 88 - 97