Government subsidies in manufacturing and remanufacturing with consumer segment and heterogeneous demand

被引:1
|
作者
Xu, L. [1 ,2 ]
Peng, Q. [3 ]
Chen, J. [1 ]
Wang, Ch [3 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Maritime Univ, Coll Transport & Commun, Shanghai 201306, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Antai Coll Econ & Management, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Maritime Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Shanghai 201306, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Manufacturing and remanufacturing; Government subsidy; Consumer segment; Heterogeneous demand; LOOP SUPPLY CHAIN; DUAL-CHANNEL; COMPETITION; COORDINATION; MARKET; IMPACT; PRICE; POLICIES; STRATEGY; REVERSE;
D O I
10.24200/sci.2019.50493.1724
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Waste products have dual properties; environmental hazards and resource recovery, while recycling behavior has a greater positive external economic effect, which often results in less enthusiasm for enterprises to engage in remanufactured activity. For price decisions on whether a government should subsidize a closed-loop supply chain or not, a Stackelberg game model was constructed under three scenarios: 1) none are subsidized (Model N), 2) subsidize the manufacturer (Model M), and 3) subsidize the recycler (Model R). This is in order to obtain the optimal government subsidy and decisions regarding costs, as well as to analyze the difference between the equilibrium of the three scenarios. It has been concluded that a government subsidy improves social welfare, as well as a government implementation of different subsidy policies based on the need for economic and social progress. (C) 2021 Sharif University of Technology. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1817 / 1829
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Research on the Heterogeneous Impact of Government Subsidies on Technological Innovation of China's New Energy Enterprises
    Yue, Yu
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-COMMERCE, E-BUSINESS AND E-GOVERNMENT, ICEEG 2022, 2022, : 310 - 317
  • [42] Investigation on Heterogeneous Influence of Government Subsidies on Pollution Reduction of Power Companies and Its Influencing Mechanism
    Wang, Qin
    Zheng, Xiaoqi
    Yue, Zhonggang
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2022, 10
  • [43] The Effectiveness of Government Subsidies on Manufacturing Innovation: Evidence from the New Energy Vehicle Industry in China
    Jiang, Cailou
    Zhang, Ying
    Bu, Maoliang
    Liu, Weishu
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (06):
  • [44] Investigation on Heterogeneous Influence of Government Subsidies on Pollution Reduction of Power Companies and Its Influencing Mechanism
    Wang, Qin
    Zheng, Xiaoqi
    Yue, Zhonggang
    [J]. Frontiers in Energy Research, 2022, 10
  • [45] Heterogeneous Demand, Government Intervention and Housing Price: Chaos Analysis Perspective
    Sun, Qian
    Dong, Jichang
    Tang, Yong
    [J]. EURASIA JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION, 2017, 13 (12) : 8177 - 8184
  • [46] A sustainable manufacturing-remanufacturing inventory model with price and green sensitive demand for defective and usable items
    Haque, Rakibul
    Pervin, Magfura
    Mondal, Sankar Prasad
    [J]. RAIRO-OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2024, 58 (04)
  • [47] A robust optimisation model for hybrid remanufacturing and manufacturing systems under uncertain return quality and market demand
    Han, Shuihua
    Ma, Weina
    Zhao, Ling
    Zhang, Xuelian
    Lim, Ming K.
    Yang, Shuangyuan
    Leung, Stephen
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2016, 54 (17) : 5056 - 5072
  • [48] The Impacts of Government Subsidies and Consumer Preferences on Food Supply Chain Traceability under Different Power Structures
    Xue, Weixia
    Xu, Zhiduan
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (01)
  • [49] Government doctor absenteeism and its effects on consumer demand in rural north India
    Iles, Richard A.
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2019, 28 (04) : 475 - 491
  • [50] Citizen demand for interactive e-government - The case of Georgia consumer services
    Streib, Gregory
    Navarro, Ignacio
    [J]. AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2006, 36 (03): : 288 - 300