Psychometric validation of the psoriasis disability index questionnaire (Translated Bengali Version): A cross-sectional study

被引:3
|
作者
Mir, Anaitulah Ahmad [1 ]
Chattopadhyay, Abhijit [1 ]
Pramanick, Jaytilak [1 ]
Gautam, Ashish [2 ]
Mir, Showkat Ahmad [3 ]
Koley, Munmun
Saha, Subhranil
机构
[1] Natl Inst Homoeopathy, Dept Homoeopath Mat Med, Block GE,Sect 3, Kolkata 700106, W Bengal, India
[2] Natl Inst Homoeopathy, Dept Case Taking & Repertory, Kolkata, W Bengal, India
[3] Malpora Bomai Sopore, Baramulla, Jammu & Kashmir, India
来源
关键词
Confirmatory factor analysis; principal component analysis; psoriasis disability index; reliability; validity; EXPLORATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; BURDEN; COMMON;
D O I
10.4103/jdds.jdds_38_19
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Introduction: The Psoriasis Disability Index (PDI) is a pre-validated, self-administered questionnaire assessing quality of life in adults suffering from psoriasis. The English version contains 15 items measuring five components - activities, work/school performance, personal, leisure, and treatment. Purpose: We aimed to translate the PDI into Bengali and examine its psychometric properties. Methods: The PDI-Bengali version (PDI-B) was produced by standardized forward-backward translations. A cross-sectional study was conducted to gather responses by consecutive sampling. Reliability was tested using internal consistency and test-retest reliability analyses, concurrent validity by comparing with Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and Dermatological Life Quality Index scores, while construct validity by exploratory factor analysis (n= 83) using principal component analysis (varimax rotation). Subsequently, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA; n = 85) was performed to verify the a priori scales by the goodness of fit model. Results: The internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and the intra-class correlation coefficients were 0.877 and 0.882, respectively. Acceptable values of internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and concurrent validity were found. All the items loaded above the pre-specified value of 0.4. Factor analyses using Varimax identified three components (social activities, concern, and personal activities) explaining 56.8% of the variation. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin was 0.836 and Bartlett's test of sphericity was P < 0.001. The goodness of fit of CFA model was excellent. Conclusion: The PDI-B, consisting of 15 items and framed within three components, is a valid and reliable questionnaire, but measured different dimensions from the English version.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 32
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Translation, cultural debugging, and validation of the Chinese version of the Sour Seven Questionnaire: a cross-sectional study
    Zhu, Shichao
    Liu, Shiqing
    Li, Liming
    Xing, Huanmin
    Xia, Ming
    Dong, Guangyan
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 11
  • [22] Validation of the Japanese version of the barriers questionnaire II in cancer pain management: a cross-sectional study
    Naoki Sakakibara
    Hiroko Komatsu
    Mikako Takahashi
    Hideko Yamauchi
    Teruo Yamauchi
    Ardith Z. Doorenbos
    BMC Palliative Care, 19
  • [23] Validation of the Japanese version of the barriers questionnaire II in cancer pain management: a cross-sectional study
    Sakakibara, Naoki
    Komatsu, Hiroko
    Takahashi, Mikako
    Yamauchi, Hideko
    Yamauchi, Teruo
    Doorenbos, Ardith Z.
    BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2020, 19 (01)
  • [24] Development and Validation of Stroke-specific Shoulder Disability Index: A Cross-sectional Study
    Chatterjee, Subhasish
    Ali, Kamran
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2023, 17 (02) : YC04 - YC09
  • [25] Validation of a translated Chinese version of the Participation Strategies Self-Efficacy Scale: a cross-sectional study
    Chau, Janita Pak Chun
    Lo, Suzanne Hoi Shan
    Zhao, Jie
    Choi, Kai Chow
    Lam, Simon Kwun Yu
    Saran, Ravneet
    Shi, Jinping
    Thompson, David R.
    Lau, Alexander Yuk Lun
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2022, 44 (18) : 5277 - 5283
  • [26] Cross-sectional validation of the German version of the Asthma Impairment and Risk Questionnaire (AIRQ)
    Kanniess, F.
    Lommatzsch, M.
    Schultz, T.
    Timmermann, H.
    Schmidt, O.
    Heindl, S.
    Defosse, K.
    Baumann, H.
    Lange, C.
    Dirlam, D.
    Fernandez-Lazaro, C. I.
    Rudolph, A.
    Korn, S.
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2022, 60
  • [27] VALIDATION OF THE SPANISH VERSION OF THE PSORIASIS DISABILITY INDEX QUESTIONNAIRE IN ASSESSING THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF PATIENTS WITH MODERATE-SEVERE PSORIASIS
    Vanaclocha, Francisco
    Puig, Lluis
    Dauden, Esteban
    Escudero, Jeronimo
    Hernanz, Jose M.
    Ferrandiz, Carlos
    Febrer, Isabel
    Lizan, Luis
    Badia, Xavier
    ACTAS DERMO-SIFILIOGRAFICAS, 2005, 96 (10): : 659 - 668
  • [28] Psychometric validation of the authorized Polish version of the Neck Disability Index
    Guzy, Grazyna
    Vernon, Howard
    Polczyk, Romuald
    Szpitalak, Malwina
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2013, 35 (25) : 2132 - 2137
  • [29] Psychometric validation of a chinese version of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy scale: a cross-sectional study
    Huang, Yiman
    Wu, Yijin
    Dai, Zhenwei
    Xiao, Weijun
    Wang, Hao
    Si, Mingyu
    Wang, Wenjun
    Gu, Xiaofen
    Ma, Li
    Li, Li
    Zhang, Shaokai
    Yang, Chunxia
    Yu, Yanqin
    Qiao, Youlin
    Su, Xiaoyou
    BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [30] Psychometric validation of a chinese version of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy scale: a cross-sectional study
    Yiman Huang
    Yijin Wu
    Zhenwei Dai
    Weijun Xiao
    Hao Wang
    Mingyu Si
    Wenjun Wang
    Xiaofen Gu
    Li Ma
    Li Li
    Shaokai Zhang
    Chunxia Yang
    Yanqin Yu
    Youlin Qiao
    Xiaoyou Su
    BMC Infectious Diseases, 22