Effects of swirl intensity on interfacial and wall friction factors of annular flows in a vertical pipe

被引:4
|
作者
Koto, Ryoya [1 ]
Kurimoto, Ryo [1 ]
Imaizumi, Atsuya [1 ]
Hayashi, Kosuke [1 ]
Tomiyama, Akio [1 ]
机构
[1] Kobe Univ, Grad Sch Engn, 1-1 Rokkodai, Nada, Kobe, Japan
关键词
2-PHASE FLOW; SEPARATOR; DROP;
D O I
10.1016/j.nucengdes.2022.112001
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
Interfacial and wall friction factors, f(i) and f(w), of air-water swirling annular flows in a vertical pipe of diameter D = 30 mm were measured in three sections of L* (=L/D) = 7.3, 13 and 31, where L is the distance from a swirler. The gas and liquid volumetric fluxes, J(G) and J(L), were 12.5 <= J(G) <= 20.0 m/s and 0.071 <= J(L) <= 0.213 m/s, respectively. The interfacial swirl number, s(i), defined by V-i theta/V-iz, where V-i theta and V-iz are the azimuthal and axial components of interfacial velocity, was introduced as an indicator of swirl intensity. For z* (=z/D) <= 7, where z is the axial coordinate in the test section, the s(i) increased with z* at low J(G) and J(L), and slightly decreased with z* at high J(G) and J(L). The s(i) decreased for z* > 7 and reached zero at z* asymptotic to 30. The f(w) estimated using the three-fluid model was larger than that estimated using the two-fluid model since the droplet flow rate was not negligible even in swirling annular flows. The three-fluid model was therefore more appropriate for evaluation of f(i) and f(w) than the two-fluid model. The ratio f(w)& lowast; increased with (s)overbar i for (s)overbar i > 0.25, where fw & lowast; is the ratio of f(w) to that of non-swirling flows and (s)overbar i is the averaged value of s(i) in the section. The ratio fi & lowast; increased with (s)overbar i for (s)overbar i > 0.18, where f(i)& lowast; is the ratio of f(i) to that of non-swirling flows. Correlations in terms of (s)overbar i have prospect to evaluate the f(i) and f(w) in swirling annular flows.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Design of a capacitance sensor for void fraction measurement in annular flows through a vertical pipe
    Ko, Min Seok
    Yun, Byong Jo
    Kim, Kyung Youn
    Kim, Sin
    MEASUREMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 23 (10)
  • [22] FRICTION LOSSES AND MACROTURBULENT INTENSITY IN TWO-PHASE PIPE-FLOWS.
    Kazanskij, Igor
    1600, (09):
  • [24] DETERMINATION OF WALL FRICTION FOR VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL 2-PHASE BUBBLY FLOWS
    DAVIS, MR
    JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1974, 96 (02): : 173 - 179
  • [25] MIXED CONVECTION FRICTION FACTORS AND NUSSELT NUMBERS IN VERTICAL ANNULAR AND SUBCHANNEL GEOMETRIES
    IANNELLO, V
    SUH, KY
    TODREAS, NE
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER, 1988, 31 (10) : 2175 - 2189
  • [26] Wall skin friction and mean velocity profiles of fully developed turbulent pipe flows
    Zanoun, E.-S.
    Durst, F.
    Bayoumy, O.
    Al-Salaymeh, A.
    EXPERIMENTAL THERMAL AND FLUID SCIENCE, 2007, 32 (01) : 249 - 261
  • [27] Friction Factors of Pipe Bundle Systems with Longitudinal Ribs in Laminar Flows.
    Schenkel, Gerhard
    Verfahrenstechnik, 1983, 17 (09): : 531 - 534
  • [28] Combined buoyancy and viscous effects in liquid–liquid flows in a vertical pipe
    Bhadraiah Vempati
    Mahesh V. Panchagnula
    Alparslan Öztekin
    Sudhakar Neti
    Acta Mechanica, 2010, 210 : 1 - 12
  • [29] Interfacial friction factor in vertical upward gas-liquid annular two-phase flow
    Wongwises, S
    Kongkiatwanitch, W
    INTERNATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS IN HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER, 2001, 28 (03) : 323 - 336
  • [30] Characterization of the gas-liquid interfacial waves in vertical upward co-current annular flows
    Cuadros, J. L.
    Rivera, Y.
    Berna, C.
    Escriva, A.
    Munoz-Cobo, J. L.
    Monros-Andreu, G.
    Chiva, S.
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2019, 346 : 112 - 130