Machine Learning Methods for Postprocessing Ensemble Forecasts of Wind Gusts: A Systematic Comparison

被引:35
|
作者
Schulz, Benedikt [1 ]
Lerch, Sebastian [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Karlsruhe Inst Technol, Karlsruhe, Germany
[2] Heidelberg Inst Theoret Studies, Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
Wind gusts; Ensembles; Forecast verification/skill; Forecasting techniques; Numerical weather prediction/forecasting; Probability forecasts/models/distribution; Statistical forecasting; Postprocessing; Machine learning; Neural networks; NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION; MODEL OUTPUT STATISTICS; PROBABILISTIC FORECASTS; SCORING RULES; REGRESSION; CALIBRATION; SCHEMES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1175/MWR-D-21-0150.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Postprocessing ensemble weather predictions to correct systematic errors has become a standard practice in research and operations. However, only a few recent studies have focused on ensemble postprocessing of wind gust forecasts, despite its importance for severe weather warnings. Here, we provide a comprehensive review and systematic comparison of eight statistical and machine learning methods for probabilistic wind gust forecasting via ensemble postprocessing that can be divided in three groups: state-of-the-art postprocessing techniques from statistics [ensemble model output statistics (EMOS), member-by-member postprocessing, isotonic distributional regression], established machine learning methods (gradient-boosting extended EMOS, quantile regression forests), and neural network-based approaches (distributional regression network, Bernstein quantile network, histogram estimation network). The methods are systematically compared using 6 years of data from a high-resolution, convection-permitting ensemble prediction system that was run operationally at the German weather service, and hourly observations at 175 surface weather stations in Germany. While all postprocessing methods yield calibrated forecasts and are able to correct the systematic errors of the raw ensemble predictions, incorporating information from additional meteorological predictor variables beyond wind gusts leads to significant improvements in forecast skill. In particular, we propose a flexible framework of locally adaptive neural networks with different probabilistic forecast types as output, which not only significantly outperform all benchmark postprocessing methods but also learn physically consistent relations associated with the diurnal cycle, especially the evening transition of the planetary boundary layer.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:235 / 257
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Prediction of Concrete Properties Using Ensemble Machine Learning Methods
    Prayogo, D.
    Santoso, D., I
    Wijaya, D.
    Gunawan, T.
    Widjaja, J. A.
    2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE, 2020, 1625
  • [42] Advances in Machine Learning Modeling Reviewing Hybrid and Ensemble Methods
    Ardabili, Sina
    Mosavi, Amir
    Varkonyi-Koczy, Annamaria R.
    ENGINEERING FOR SUSTAINABLE FUTURE, 2020, 101 : 215 - 227
  • [43] Special Issue on Hybrid and Ensemble Methods in Machine Learning Preface
    Cordon, Oscar
    Kazienko, Przemyslaw
    Trawinski, Bogdan
    NEW GENERATION COMPUTING, 2011, 29 (03) : 241 - 244
  • [44] An experimental comparison of ensemble learning methods on decision boundaries
    Liu, Y
    Yao, X
    Zhao, QF
    Higuchi, T
    PROCEEDING OF THE 2002 INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON NEURAL NETWORKS, VOLS 1-3, 2002, : 221 - 226
  • [45] Screening for in vitro systematic reviews: a comparison of screening methods and training of a machine learning classifier
    Wilson, Emma
    Cruz, Florenz
    Maclean, Duncan
    Ghanawi, Joly
    McCann, Sarah K.
    Brennan, Paul M.
    Liao, Jing
    Sena, Emily S.
    Macleod, Malcolm
    CLINICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 137 (02) : 181 - 193
  • [46] Comparison of multivariate post-processing methods using global ECMWF ensemble forecasts
    Lakatos, Mária
    Lerch, Sebastian
    Hemri, Stephan
    Baran, Sándor
    arXiv, 2022,
  • [47] Comparison model predictive control that can forecastsof two methods deal ensemble with forecasts
    Horvath, Klaudia
    Smorenburg, Maarten
    Vreeken, Diederik
    Piovesan, Teresa
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2022, 55 (33): : 27 - 33
  • [48] Comparison of multivariate post-processing methods using global ECMWF ensemble forecasts
    Lakatos, Maria
    Lerch, Sebastian
    Hemri, Stephan
    Baran, Sandor
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2023, 149 (752) : 856 - 877
  • [49] Forecasting the risk at infractions: an ensemble comparison of machine learning approach
    Li, Lei
    Wu, Desheng
    INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT & DATA SYSTEMS, 2022, 122 (01) : 1 - 19
  • [50] Comparison of individual, ensemble and integrated ensemble machine learning methods to predict China’s SME credit risk in supply chain finance
    You Zhu
    Chi Xie
    Gang-Jin Wang
    Xin-Guo Yan
    Neural Computing and Applications, 2017, 28 : 41 - 50