Can the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Risk Calculator Predict Outcomes for Urgent Colectomies?

被引:7
|
作者
Ziegler, Matthew A. [1 ]
Bauman, John C. [1 ]
Welsh, Robert J. [2 ]
Wasvary, Harry J. [1 ]
机构
[1] William Beaumont Hosp, Dept Colon & Rectal Surg, Royal Oak, MI USA
[2] William Beaumont Hosp, Dept Surg, Royal Oak, MI 48072 USA
关键词
colectomy; urgent; NSQIP; risk calculator;
D O I
10.1177/0003134820973392
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) Risk Calculator (RC) predicts postoperative outcomes using 19 risk factors, including operative acuity. Acuity is defined by the calculator as emergent or elective only. The objective of this study is to evaluate the RC's accuracy in urgent (nonelective/nonemergent) cases. Methods This is a retrospective review of the NSQIP data for patients who underwent urgent colectomies at a single tertiary care center over a 4-year period. Each urgent case was entered into the RC as both elective and emergent, and predicted outcomes were compared to actual postoperative outcomes. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used when sufficient statistical power was present and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. Results A total of 301 urgent colectomy patients were evaluated, representing 19% of all colectomies performed at our institution during the study period. Of the 15 possible postoperative outcomes, the RC showed high predictive value only for mortality (AUC elective .8467; emergent .8451) and discharge to a nursing/rehabilitation facility (AUC elective .8089; emergent .8105). The RC showed no predictive value for 6 outcomes and the remainder lacked statistical power to draw conclusions. Discussion While the calculator predicted mortality and discharge to a nursing/rehabilitation facility, it did not accurately predict complications for urgent colectomies. Future versions of the calculator should focus on improving the predictive value by including urgent cases as a separate category.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 69
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluating Postoperative Morbidity in Patients Undergoing Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Surgical Risk Calculator
    Boyd, Sarah S.
    O'Sullivan, David M.
    Lasala, Christine
    FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 26 (06): : 364 - 369
  • [32] Outcomes after pancreatectomy with surgical resident involvement: an American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis
    Cardenas, Alex R.
    Venkat, Raghunandan
    Guerrero, Marlon A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2014, 219 (04) : E108 - E108
  • [33] Is the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program surgical risk calculator applicable for breast cancer patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery?
    Lyle, Brian
    Landercasper, Jeffrey
    Johnson, Jeanne M.
    Al-Hamadani, Mohammed
    Vang, Choua A.
    Groshek, Jacqueline
    Hennessy, Joy L.
    Theede, Lonna M.
    Zutavern, Kristin
    Linebarger, Jared H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 211 (04): : 820 - 823
  • [34] Pediatric American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: feasibility of a novel, prospective assessment of surgical outcomes
    Raval, Mehul V.
    Dillon, Peter W.
    Bruny, Jennifer L.
    Ko, Clifford Y.
    Hall, Bruce L.
    Moss, R. Lawrence
    Oldham, Keith T.
    Richards, Karen E.
    Vinocur, Charles D.
    Ziegler, Moritz M.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2011, 46 (01) : 115 - 121
  • [35] A calculator for mortality following emergency general surgery based on the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database
    Haskins, Ivy N.
    Maluso, Patrick J.
    Schroeder, Mary E.
    Amdur, Richard L.
    Vaziri, Khashayar
    Agarwal, Samir
    Sarani, Babak
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2017, 82 (06): : 1094 - 1099
  • [36] Understanding the Reliability of American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program as a Quality Comparator
    Rhoads, Kim F.
    Wren, Sherry M.
    JAMA SURGERY, 2014, 149 (05) : 474 - 474
  • [37] What Can Thyroidectomy-Specific Outcomes Teach Us About the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program?
    Angelos, Peter
    JAMA SURGERY, 2018, 153 (01)
  • [38] New approaches to the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: the American College of Surgeons experience
    Hall, Bruce L.
    Richards, Karen
    Ingraham, Angela
    Ko, Clifford Y.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 198 (5A): : S56 - S62
  • [39] American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: first Australian experience
    Bennett, Ian C.
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 89 (05) : 459 - 460
  • [40] Evaluation of hospitals participating in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program
    Sheils, Catherine R.
    Dahlke, Allison R.
    Kreutzer, Lindsey
    Bilimoria, Karl Y.
    Yang, Anthony D.
    SURGERY, 2016, 160 (05) : 1182 - 1188