Water Ecosystem Services Footprint of agricultural production in Central Italy

被引:11
|
作者
Pacetti, Tommaso [1 ]
Castelli, Giulio [2 ]
Schroeder, Boris [3 ,4 ]
Bresci, Elena [2 ]
Caporali, Enrica [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Firenze, Dept Civil & Environm Engn DICEA, Florence, Italy
[2] Univ Firenze, Dept Agr Food Environm & Forestry DAGRI, Florence, Italy
[3] Tech Univ Carolo Wilhelmina Braunschweig, Inst Geoecol, Landscape Ecol & Environm Syst Anal, Langer Kamp 19c, D-38106 Braunschweig, Germany
[4] Berlin Brandenburg Inst Adv Biodivers Res BBIB, Konigin Luise Str 2-4, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Integrated water resources management; Ecosystem services; Water Footprint; SWAT; Arno river; SUPPLY-AND-DEMAND; RIVER; MODEL; NATIONS; BLUE;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149095
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The appropriate implementation of the concept of Water-related Ecosystem Services (WES) in water resources planning can support the development of productive activities and, at the same time, sustain local ecosystems. However, such implementation it is only possible when both WES supply and demand are evaluated, eventually with a spatially explicit method, for gaining insights into the ecohydrological behavior of a basin and the anthropogenic pressures on the available water resources. Based on the integration of hydrological modelling and Water Footprint (WF) analysis, this study aims at developing a methodology to analyze both the supply and demand of WES, evaluating a Water Ecosystem Services Footprint (WESF) associated with the agricultural sector. The proposed methodology is based on a 3-tiered approach: 1) evaluating the WES demand determined by the agricultural sector using the WF Assessment methodology; 2) quantifying the WES supply by applying the Soil Water Assessment Tool (SWAT); 3) estimating the green, blue, and gray WESF through dedicated indicators in order to identify the main hotspots. The methodology is applied to a specific case study in the upstream part of the Arno river basin (Central Italy). By means of subnational WF statistics the green, blue, and gray WF of the agricultural sector is calculated, determining the spatial distribution of WES demand in the catchment. SWAT results quantify the available water resources, pointing out the blue/green surface water partitioning, where precipitation is divided into 25% runoff and 46% evapotranspiration, and the associated WES supply. Merging the results, the WESF spatial pattern is evaluated, properly identifying the most critical areas in the catchment. WESF represents an operative tool to look at agricultural water management from an ecosystem-based perspective, supporting the identification of the strategies to explore the sustainable coupling of biosphere and anthroposphere. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A new approach to assessing the water footprint of hydroelectric power based on allocation of water footprints among reservoir ecosystem services
    Zhao, Dandan
    Liu, Junguo
    PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OF THE EARTH, 2015, 79-82 : 40 - 46
  • [42] An assessment of ecosystem services: Water flow regulation and hydroelectric power production
    Guo, ZW
    Xiao, XM
    Li, DM
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2000, 10 (03) : 925 - 936
  • [43] Evaluating the impacts of Payment for Ecosystem Services (water supplies) in an agricultural system of the Brazilian Cerrado
    De Oliveira, Franciele De Kassia
    Santos, Carolina Emilia Dos
    Siqueira, Mariana N.
    Passos, Haihani S.
    Morais, Alessandro R.
    ANAIS DA ACADEMIA BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIAS, 2023, 95 (02):
  • [44] Distributed generation and water production: A study for a region in central Italy
    Comodi, Gabriele
    Cioccolanti, Luca
    Palpacelli, Stefano
    Tazioli, Alberto
    Nanni, Torquato
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2011, 31 (1-3) : 218 - 225
  • [45] Exploring ecosystem services assessment through Ecological Footprint accounting
    Mancini, Maria Serena
    Galli, Alessandro
    Coscieme, Luca
    Niccolucci, Valentina
    Lin, David
    Pulselli, Federico Maria
    Bastianoni, Simone
    Marchettini, Nadia
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2018, 30 : 228 - 235
  • [46] Restoration of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services on Agricultural Land
    José M. Rey Benayas
    James M. Bullock
    Ecosystems, 2012, 15 : 883 - 899
  • [47] Establishment of Valuation Framework for Agricultural Ecosystem Services
    He, Kung-Hui
    Huang, Yu-Chieh
    Lin, Kuan-Ting
    Chang, I-Ting
    Guo, Horng-Yuh
    Pan, Shu-Yuan
    Journal of Taiwan Agricultural Engineering, 2022, 68 (03): : 21 - 32
  • [48] Implications of agricultural transitions and urbanization for ecosystem services
    Graeme S. Cumming
    Andreas Buerkert
    Ellen M. Hoffmann
    Eva Schlecht
    Stephan von Cramon-Taubadel
    Teja Tscharntke
    Nature, 2014, 515 : 50 - 57
  • [49] The water footprint of hydrogen production
    Olaitan, Damola
    Bertagni, Matteo
    Porporato, Amilcare
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 927
  • [50] Restoration of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services on Agricultural Land
    Rey Benayas, Jose M.
    Bullock, James M.
    ECOSYSTEMS, 2012, 15 (06) : 883 - 899