Induction of labour at 41 weeks of gestation versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks of gestation: a cost-effectiveness analysis

被引:10
|
作者
Alkmark, M. [1 ,2 ]
Wennerholm, U-B [1 ,2 ]
Saltvedt, S. [3 ]
Bergh, C. [2 ]
Carlsson, Y. [1 ,2 ]
Elden, H. [2 ,4 ]
Fadl, H. [5 ]
Jonsson, M. [6 ]
Ladfors, L. [1 ,2 ]
Sengpiel, V [1 ,2 ]
Wesstrom, J. [6 ,7 ]
Hagberg, H. [1 ,2 ]
Svensson, M. [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Ctr Perinatal Med & Hlth,Inst Clin Sci, Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Reg Vastra Gotaland, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Karolinska Inst, Dept Womens & Childrens Hlth, Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Hlth & Caring Sci, Gothenburg, Sweden
[5] Orebro Univ, Fac Med & Hlth, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Orebro, Sweden
[6] Uppsala Univ, Dept Womens & Childrens Hlth, Uppsala, Sweden
[7] Falun Cent Hosp, Ctr Clin Res Dalarna, Falun, Sweden
[8] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Med, Sch Publ Hlth & Community Med, Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
Cost-effectiveness; induction of labour; prolonged pregnancy; POSTTERM PREGNANCY; TRIALS; HEALTH; RISK; WOMEN; TERM;
D O I
10.1111/1471-0528.16929
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective To assess the cost-effectiveness of induction of labour (IOL) at 41 weeks of gestation compared with expectant management until 42 weeks of gestation. Design A cost-effectiveness analysis alongside the Swedish Post-term Induction Study (SWEPIS), a multicentre, randomised controlled superiority trial. Setting Fourteen Swedish hospitals during 2016-2018. Population Women with an uncomplicated singleton pregnancy with a fetus in cephalic position were randomised at 41 weeks of gestation to IOL or to expectant management and induction at 42 weeks of gestation. Methods Health benefits were measured in life years and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for mother and child. Total cost per birth was calculated, including healthcare costs from randomisation to discharge after delivery, for mother and child. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated by dividing the difference in mean cost between the trial arms by the difference in life years and QALYs, respectively. Sampling uncertainty was evaluated using non-parametric bootstrapping. Main outcome measures The cost per gained life year and per gained QALY. Results The differences in life years and QALYs gained were driven by the difference in perinatal mortality alone. The absolute risk reduction in mortality was 0.004 (from 6/1373 to 0/1373). Based on Swedish life tables, this gives a mean gain in discounted life years and QALYs of 0.14 and 0.12 per birth, respectively. The mean cost per birth was euro4108 in the IOL group (n = 1373) and euro4037 in the expectant management group (n = 1373), with a mean difference of euro71 (95% CI -euro232 to euro379). The ICER for IOL compared with expectant management was euro545 per life year gained and euro623 per QALY gained. Confidence intervals were relatively wide and included the possibility that IOL had both lower costs and better health outcomes. Conclusions Induction of labour at 41 weeks of gestation results in a better health outcome and no significant difference in costs. IOL is cost-effective compared with expectant management until 42 weeks of gestation using standard threshold values for acceptable cost per life year/QALY. Tweetable abstract Induction of labour at 41 weeks of gestation is cost-effective compared with expectant management until 42 weeks of gestation.
引用
收藏
页码:2157 / 2165
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Study protocol of SWEPIS a Swedish multicentre register based randomised controlled trial to compare induction of labour at 41 completed gestational weeks versus expectant management and induction at 42 completed gestational weeks
    Helen Elden
    Henrik Hagberg
    Anna Wessberg
    Verena Sengpiel
    Andreas Herbst
    Maria Bullarbo
    Christina Bergh
    Kristian Bolin
    Snezana Malbasic
    Sissel Saltvedt
    Olof Stephansson
    Anna-Karin Wikström
    Lars Ladfors
    Ulla-Britt Wennerholm
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 16
  • [22] Study protocol of SWEPIS a Swedish multicentre register based randomised controlled trial to compare induction of labour at 41 completed gestational weeks versus expectant management and induction at 42 completed gestational weeks
    Elden, Helen
    Hagberg, Henrik
    Wessberg, Anna
    Sengpiel, Verena
    Herbst, Andreas
    Bullarbo, Maria
    Bergh, Christina
    Bolin, Kristian
    Malbasic, Snezana
    Saltvedt, Sissel
    Stephansson, Olof
    Wikstrom, Anna-Karin
    Ladfors, Lars
    Wennerholm, Ulla-Britt
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2016, 16
  • [23] Randomised trial of outpatient induction of labor with vaginal PGE(2) at 40-41 weeks of gestation versus expectant management
    Ohel, G
    Rahav, D
    Rothbart, H
    Ruach, M
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 1996, 258 (03) : 109 - 112
  • [24] Comparison of induction of labour regimes for termination of pregnancy, with and without mifepristone, from 20 to 41weeks gestation
    Fyfe, Rina
    Murray, Henry
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2017, 57 (06): : 604 - 608
  • [25] Induction of labor versus expectant management for pregnancies beyond 41 weeks
    Daskalakis, George
    Zacharakis, Dimitrios
    Simou, Maria
    Pappa, Peny
    Detorakis, Stelios
    Mesogitis, Spyros
    Antsaklis, Aris
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2014, 27 (02): : 173 - 176
  • [26] Cost effectiveness of induction of labor at 39 weeks versus expectant management by cervical exam
    Fitzgerald, Alison C.
    Kaimal, Anjali J.
    Little, Sarah E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 226 (01) : S407 - S407
  • [27] Cost-effectiveness of induction of labor at 39 weeks vs expectant management by cervical examination
    Fitzgerald, Alison C.
    Kaimal, Anjali J.
    Little, Sarah E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 229 (02)
  • [28] Induction of labor at 41 weeks or expectant management until 42 weeks - preliminary results of the INDEX trial
    Bruinsma, Aafke
    Keulen, Judit
    Kortekaas, Joep
    van Dillen, Jeroen
    Oudijk, Martijn
    Bakker, Jannet
    van Kaam, Anton
    Bossuyt, Patrick
    Vandenbussche, Frank
    van de Post, Joris
    Mol, Ben-Willem
    de Miranda, Esteriek
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 216 (01) : S27 - S28
  • [29] Elective Induction of Labor Compared With Expectant Management of Nulliparous Women at 39 Weeks of Gestation
    Miller, Nathaniel R.
    Cypher, Rebecca L.
    Foglia, Lisa M.
    Pates, Jason A.
    Nielsen, Peter E.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 126 (06): : 1258 - 1264
  • [30] Induction of labour versus expectant management for well women and babies in pregnancies extending beyond 41 weeks: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    McKenzie, Ingrid
    Davis, Deborah
    Ferguson, Sally
    WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2018, 31 : S36 - S36