Balloon Dilatation and Stenting for Aortic Coarctation A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:36
|
作者
Salcher, Maximilian [1 ]
Naci, Huseyin [1 ]
Law, Tyler J. [1 ,2 ]
Kuehne, Titus [3 ]
Schubert, Stephan [3 ]
Kelm, Marcus [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ London London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, LSE Hlth, London WC2A 2AE, England
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Anesthesia, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Deutsch Herzzentrum Berlin, Dept Paediat Cardiol & Congenital Heart Dis, Berlin, Germany
关键词
aneurysm; angioplasty; balloon; congenital; meta-analysis; stent; TERM-FOLLOW-UP; NATIVE COARCTATION; RECURRENT COARCTATION; ANGIOPLASTY TREATMENT; ADULT; ADOLESCENTS; REPAIR; INCONSISTENCY; COMPLICATIONS; INTERMEDIATE;
D O I
10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003153
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background-There is no systematic assessment of available evidence on effectiveness and comparative effectiveness of balloon dilatation and stenting for aortic coarctation. Methods and Results-We systematically searched 4 online databases to identify and select relevant studies of balloon dilatation and stenting for aortic coarctation based on a priori criteria (PROSPERO 2014:CRD42014014418). We quantitatively synthesized results for each intervention from single-arm studies and obtained pooled estimates for relative effectiveness from pairwise and network meta-analysis of comparative studies. Our primary analysis included 15 stenting (423 participants) and 12 balloon dilatation studies (361 participants), including patients >= 10 years of age. Post-treatment blood pressure gradient reduction to <= 20 and <= 10 mm Hg was achieved in 89.5% (95% confidence interval, 83.7-95.3) and 66.5% (44.1-88.9%) of patients undergoing balloon dilatation, and in 99.5% (97.5-100.0%) and 93.8% (88.5-99.1%) of patients undergoing stenting, respectively. Odds of achieving <= 20 mm Hg were lower with balloon dilatation as compared with stenting (odds ratio, 0.105 [0.010-0.886]). Thirty-day survival rates were comparable. Numerically more patients undergoing balloon dilatation experienced severe complications during admission (6.4% [2.6-10.2%]) compared with stenting (2.6% [0.5-4.7%]). This was supported by meta-analysis of head-to-head studies (odds ratio, 9.617 [2.654-34.845]) and network meta-analysis (odds ratio, 16.23, 95% credible interval: 4.27-62.77) in a secondary analysis in patients >= 1 month of age, including 57 stenting (3397 participants) and 62 balloon dilatation studies (4331 participants). Conclusions-Despite the limitations of the evidence base consisting predominantly of single-arm studies, our review indicates that stenting achieves superior immediate relief of a relevant pressure gradient compared with balloon dilatation.
引用
收藏
页数:89
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Transradial Access for Carotid Artery Stenting
    Du, Meng
    Hu, Yueyu
    Zhu, Deyuan
    Cao, Wei
    Li, Peng
    Qi, Dayong
    Wu, Chao
    He, Juanling
    Ye, Shifei
    Li, Suya
    Fang, Yibin
    ANGIOLOGY, 2024, 75 (06) : 517 - 526
  • [42] Primary balloon dilatation in coarctation of the aorta complicated by severe aortic insufficiency
    De Meester, C
    Budts, W
    Gewillig, M
    Daenen, W
    Van de Werf, F
    ACTA CARDIOLOGICA, 1998, 53 (04) : 231 - 234
  • [43] Pressure wave reflection after successful balloon dilatation of aortic coarctation
    Murakami, Tomoaki
    Ueno, Michihiko
    Takeda, Atsuhito
    Yakuwa, Satoshi
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2007, 71 (11) : 1821 - 1822
  • [44] Balloon dilatation of native aortic coarctation in two patients with Turner syndrome
    Park, Y
    Sklansky, MS
    Shaughnessy, RD
    Kashani, IA
    Rothman, A
    PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY, 2000, 21 (05) : 474 - 476
  • [45] Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Radial or Femoral Access for Carotid Stenting
    Pang-Shuo Perng
    Yu Chang
    Hao-Kuang Wang
    Yen-Ta Huang
    Chia-En Wong
    Kuan-Yu Chi
    Jung-Shun Lee
    Liang-Chao Wang
    Chih-Yuan Huang
    Clinical Neuroradiology, 2024, 34 : 3 - 12
  • [46] Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Radial or Femoral Access for Carotid Stenting
    Perng, Pang-Shuo
    Chang, Yu
    Wang, Hao-Kuang
    Huang, Yen-Ta
    Wong, Chia-En
    Chi, Kuan-Yu
    Lee, Jung-Shun
    Wang, Liang-Chao
    Huang, Chih-Yuan
    CLINICAL NEURORADIOLOGY, 2024, 34 (01) : 3 - 12
  • [47] Complications Associated With Esophageal Stenting. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Tahir, Muhammad
    Bain, Andrew
    Rivera, Ramon E.
    Singh, Amanpal
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2017, 112 : S177 - S178
  • [48] Endovascular stenting versus open surgery for thoracic aortic disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative results
    Walsh, Stewart R.
    Tang, Tjun Y.
    Sadat, Urnar
    Naik, Jag
    Gaunt, Michael E.
    Jonathan, R. Boyle
    Hayes, Paul D.
    Varty, Kevin
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2008, 47 (05) : 1094 - 1098
  • [49] Risk factors for coarctation of the aorta on prenatal ultrasound: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    D'Antonio, F.
    Khalil, A.
    Acharya, G.
    Rizzo, G.
    Sonesson, S-E
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2017, 124 : 41 - 41
  • [50] Single balloon versus double balloon bipedicular kyphoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jing, Zehao
    Dong, Jianli
    Li, Zhengwei
    Nan, Feng
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 27 (10) : 2550 - 2564