Sustainability assessments of regional water supply interventions - Combining cost-benefit and multi-criteria decision analyses

被引:22
|
作者
Sjostrand, Karin [1 ,2 ]
Lindhe, Andreas [2 ]
Soderqvist, Tore [3 ]
Rosen, Lars [2 ]
机构
[1] RISE Res Inst Sweden, Scheelevagen 27, SE-22370 Lund, Sweden
[2] Chalmers Univ Technol, Dept Architecture & Civil Engn, SE-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Anthesis Enveco, Barnhusgatan 4, SE-11123 Stockholm, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Drinking water supply; Decision support; Inter-municipal cooperation; Sustainability criteria; Cost-benefit analysis; Multi-criteria decision analysis; CONTAMINATED LAND; UNCERTAINTY; ALTERNATIVES; REMEDIATION; SYSTEMS; WEAK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.07.077
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
To cope with present and future challenges, a growing number of water utilities in Sweden, Europe and elsewhere initiate various forms of inter-municipal cooperations creating a new regional level of drinking water governance. In order to reach viable decisions of alternative ways forward, there is an international consensus that sustainability needs to be addressed in water supply planning, design and decision-making. There are, however, few decision aids focusing on assessing the sustainability of inter-municipal cooperations and the intermunicipal policies and interventions that regional decision-makers are faced with. This paper presents a decision support model based on a combination of cost-benefit analysis and multi-criteria decision analysis for assessing the sustainability of regional water supply interventions, including formations of inter-municipal cooperations. The proposed decision support model integrates quantitative and semi-quantitative information on sustainability criteria. It provides a novel way of presenting monetized benefits and costs, capturing utilitarian aspects of alternative interventions, with non-monetized social and environmental effects, capturing aspects based in the deontological theories of moral ethics. The model is based on a probabilistic approach where uncertainties are defined by statistical probability distributions. A case study is used to exemplify and evaluate model application in decision situations regarding regionalization, (de)centralization, source water quality and redundancy. All evaluated alternatives were expected to contribute to a slightly improved social sustainability, whereas the results were more varying in the economic and environmental domains. A structured and transparent treatment of uncertainties facilitates a better understanding of the results as well as communication between decision-makers, stakeholders and the community.
引用
收藏
页码:313 / 324
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of water supply alternatives for Istanbul using forecasting and multi-criteria decision making methods
    Savun-Hekimoglu, Basak
    Erbay, Barbaros
    Hekimoglu, Mustafa
    Burak, Selmin
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 287
  • [32] Multi-criteria decision making methods for rural water supply: a case study from Bangladesh
    Sikder, Abu Hena Mustafa Kamal
    Salehin, Mashfiqus
    WATER POLICY, 2015, 17 (06) : 1209 - 1223
  • [33] Use of external cost assessment and multi-criteria decision analysis for comparative evaluation of options for electricity supply
    Hirschberg, S
    Dones, R
    Gantner, U
    PSAM 5: PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-4, 2000, (34): : 289 - 296
  • [34] Cost Analysis of Water Quality Assessment Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach
    Moosavian, Seyed Farhan
    Borzuei, Daryoosh
    Ahmadi, Abolfazl
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2022, 36 (12) : 4843 - 4862
  • [35] Cost Analysis of Water Quality Assessment Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach
    Seyed Farhan Moosavian
    Daryoosh Borzuei
    Abolfazl Ahmadi
    Water Resources Management, 2022, 36 : 4843 - 4862
  • [36] Life Cycle, PESTLE, and Multi-Criteria Decision Analyses of Novel Process for Nitrogen Recovery from Reject Water: Combining Electroconcentration and Stripping Methods
    Nagy, Judit
    Thi, Huyen Trang Do
    Toth, Andras Jozsef
    WATER, 2023, 15 (18)
  • [37] Combining GIS and fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making for water catchment drilling site selection
    Boukrentach, Hafida
    Benali, Abdelmadjid
    Dekkiche, Hicham
    ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES, 2017, 10 (24)
  • [38] Multi-criteria probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy group decision making for supply chain finance credit risk assessments
    Li, Ziyang
    Zhang, Xingyu
    Wang, Wenju
    Li, Zhi
    EXPERT SYSTEMS, 2022, 39 (08)
  • [39] Combining GIS and fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making for water catchment drilling site selection
    Hafida Boukrentach
    Abdelmadjid Benali
    Hicham Dekkiche
    Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2017, 10
  • [40] Stakeholder preference elicitation and modelling in multi-criteria decision analysis - A case study on urban water supply
    Kodikara, P. N.
    Perera, B. J. C.
    Kularathna, M. D. U. P.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2010, 206 (01) : 209 - 220