Sustainability assessments of regional water supply interventions - Combining cost-benefit and multi-criteria decision analyses

被引:22
|
作者
Sjostrand, Karin [1 ,2 ]
Lindhe, Andreas [2 ]
Soderqvist, Tore [3 ]
Rosen, Lars [2 ]
机构
[1] RISE Res Inst Sweden, Scheelevagen 27, SE-22370 Lund, Sweden
[2] Chalmers Univ Technol, Dept Architecture & Civil Engn, SE-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Anthesis Enveco, Barnhusgatan 4, SE-11123 Stockholm, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Drinking water supply; Decision support; Inter-municipal cooperation; Sustainability criteria; Cost-benefit analysis; Multi-criteria decision analysis; CONTAMINATED LAND; UNCERTAINTY; ALTERNATIVES; REMEDIATION; SYSTEMS; WEAK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.07.077
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
To cope with present and future challenges, a growing number of water utilities in Sweden, Europe and elsewhere initiate various forms of inter-municipal cooperations creating a new regional level of drinking water governance. In order to reach viable decisions of alternative ways forward, there is an international consensus that sustainability needs to be addressed in water supply planning, design and decision-making. There are, however, few decision aids focusing on assessing the sustainability of inter-municipal cooperations and the intermunicipal policies and interventions that regional decision-makers are faced with. This paper presents a decision support model based on a combination of cost-benefit analysis and multi-criteria decision analysis for assessing the sustainability of regional water supply interventions, including formations of inter-municipal cooperations. The proposed decision support model integrates quantitative and semi-quantitative information on sustainability criteria. It provides a novel way of presenting monetized benefits and costs, capturing utilitarian aspects of alternative interventions, with non-monetized social and environmental effects, capturing aspects based in the deontological theories of moral ethics. The model is based on a probabilistic approach where uncertainties are defined by statistical probability distributions. A case study is used to exemplify and evaluate model application in decision situations regarding regionalization, (de)centralization, source water quality and redundancy. All evaluated alternatives were expected to contribute to a slightly improved social sustainability, whereas the results were more varying in the economic and environmental domains. A structured and transparent treatment of uncertainties facilitates a better understanding of the results as well as communication between decision-makers, stakeholders and the community.
引用
收藏
页码:313 / 324
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Composite decision support by combining cost-benefit and multi-criteria decision analysis
    Barfod, Michael Bruhn
    Salling, Kim Bang
    Leleur, Steen
    DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2011, 51 (01) : 167 - 175
  • [2] Fynbos (fine bush) vegetation and the supply of water: a comparison of multi-criteria decision analysis and cost-benefit analysis
    Joubert, AR
    Leiman, A
    deKlerk, HM
    Katua, S
    Aggenbach, LC
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1997, 22 (02) : 123 - 140
  • [3] A Multi-Criteria Cost-Benefit Analysis to optimize the oil supply networks
    Bilal, Muhammad
    Ali, Yousaf
    Sabir, Muhammad
    Petrillo, Antonella
    De Felice, Fabio
    20th International Conference on Modeling and Applied Simulation, MAS 2021, 2021, : 91 - 103
  • [4] Combining cost-benefit and multi-criteria analysis to prioritise a national road infrastructure programme
    Guehnemann, Astrid
    Laird, James J.
    Pearman, Alan D.
    TRANSPORT POLICY, 2012, 23 : 15 - 24
  • [6] Global cost-benefit analysis of water supply and sanitation interventions
    Hutton, Guy
    Haller, Laurence
    Bartram, Jamie
    JOURNAL OF WATER AND HEALTH, 2007, 5 (04) : 481 - 502
  • [7] MULTI-CRITERIA COST-BENEFIT APPROACH TO ENERGY TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT.
    Gottinger, Hans W.
    International Journal of Policy Analysis and Information Systems, 1981, 5 (03): : 211 - 227
  • [8] Multi-criteria decision analysis and cost-benefit analysis of alternative scenarios for the power generation sector in Greece
    Diakoulaki, D.
    Karangelis, F.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2007, 11 (04): : 716 - 727
  • [9] Sustainability assessment of community-based water supply projects: A multi-criteria decision approach
    Ankon S.B.
    Nishat E.A.
    Riana M.M.
    Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 2022, 19
  • [10] Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis and Cost-Benefit Analysis: Comparing alternative frameworks for integrated valuation of ecosystem services
    Saarikoski, Heli
    Mustajoki, Jyri
    Barton, David N.
    Geneletti, Davide
    Langemeyer, Johannes
    Gomez-Baggethun, Erik
    Marttunen, Mika
    Antunes, Paula
    Keune, Hans
    Santos, Rui
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2016, 22 : 238 - 249