From Partisan Media to Misperception: Affective Polarization as Mediator

被引:60
|
作者
Garrett, R. Kelly [1 ]
Long, Jacob A. [1 ]
Jeong, Min Seon [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Sch Commun, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Misperception; partisan media; affective polarization; NEWS; BIAS; ATTITUDES; EXPOSURE; OPINION; IMPACT; ONLINE; IDEOLOGY; COVERAGE; BELIEFS;
D O I
10.1093/joc/jqz028
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
This article provides evidence that affective polarization is an important mechanism linking conservative media use to political misperceptions. Partisan media's potential to polarize is well documented, and there are numerous ways in which hostility toward political opponents might promote the endorsement of inaccurate beliefs. We test this mediated model using data collected via nationally representative surveys conducted during two recent U.S. presidential elections. Fixed effects regression models using three-wave panel data collected in 2012 provide evidence that conservative media exposure contributes to more polarized feelings toward major-party presidential candidates, and this growing favorability gap is associated with misperceptions critical of the Democrats. Further, these effects are more pronounced among Republicans than among Democrats. Cross-sectional analyses using data collected in 2016 provide additional evidence of the mediated relationship. The theoretical and real-world significance of these results are discussed.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:490 / 512
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Of time and the development of partisan polarization
    Stoker, Laura
    Jennings, M. Kent
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2008, 52 (03) : 619 - 635
  • [42] Partisan Blocking: Biased Responses to Shared Misinformation Contribute to Network Polarization on Social Media
    Kaiser, Johannes
    Vaccari, Cristian
    Chadwick, Andrew
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2022, 72 (02) : 214 - 240
  • [43] Partisan Affect and Elite Polarization
    Diermeier, Daniel
    Li, Christopher
    AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2019, 113 (01) : 277 - 281
  • [44] Partisan Stereotyping and Polarization in Brazil
    Samuels, David
    Mello, Fernando
    Zucco, Cesar
    LATIN AMERICAN POLITICS AND SOCIETY, 2024, 66 (02) : 47 - 71
  • [45] Partisan Polarization and Legislators' Agendas
    Sulkin, Tracy
    Schmitt, Carly
    POLITY, 2014, 46 (03) : 430 - 448
  • [46] Social Media, Messaging Apps, and Affective Polarization in the United States and Japan
    Lee, Sangwon
    Rojas, Hernando
    Yamamoto, Masahiro
    MASS COMMUNICATION AND SOCIETY, 2022, 25 (05) : 673 - 697
  • [47] The polarizing content warning: how the media can reduce affective polarization
    Kubin, Emily
    von Sikorski, Christian
    HUMAN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 2024, 50 (03) : 404 - 418
  • [48] Partisan news sources produce and spread more high arousal negative affective content on social media
    Hsu, Tiffany W.
    Knutson, Brian
    Tsai, Jeanne L.
    AFFECTIVE SCIENCE, 2022, 3 (01)
  • [49] Cross-Partisan Conversation Reduced Affective Polarization for Republicans and Democrats Even after the Contentious 2020 Election
    Rossiter, Erin L.
    Carlson, Taylor N.
    JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2024, 86 (04): : 1608 - 1612
  • [50] Who Believes in Fraud in the 2006 Mexican Presidential Election? Election Denialism, Partisan Motivated Reasoning, and Affective Polarization
    Cornejo, Rodrigo Castro
    LATIN AMERICAN RESEARCH REVIEW, 2024,