Projected Implications of Overturning Roe v Wade on Abortion Training in US Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Programs

被引:72
|
作者
Vinekar, Kavita [1 ]
Karlapudi, Aishwarya
Nathan, Lauren
Turk, Jema K.
Rible, Radhika
Steinauer, Jody
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
来源
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY | 2022年 / 140卷 / 02期
关键词
PARTIAL PARTICIPATION; CARE;
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0000000000004832
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
In June 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court is expected to issue a decision on Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization, a direct challenge to Roe v Wade. A detailed policy analysis by the Guttmacher Institute projects that, if Roe v Wade is overturned, 21 states are certain to ban abortion and five states are likely to ban abortion. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requires access to abortion training for all obstetrics and gynecology residency programs. We performed a comprehensive study of all accredited U.S. obstetrics and gynecology residency programs to assess how many of these programs and trainees are currently located in states projected to ban abortion if Roe v Wade is overturned. We found that, of 286 accredited obstetrics and gynecology residency programs with current residents, 128 (44.8%) are in states certain or likely to ban abortion if Roe v Wade is overturned. Therefore, of 6,007 current obstetrics and gynecology residents, 2,638 (43.9%) are certain or likely to lack access to in-state abortion training. Preparation for the reversal of Roe v Wade should include not only a recognition of the negative effects on patient access to abortion care in affected states, but also of the dramatic implications for obstetrics and gynecology residency training.
引用
收藏
页码:146 / 149
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] Abortion training information on obstetrics and gynecology residency program websites
    Solomon, Bektu
    Alston, Meredith J.
    Conageski, Christine
    Sheeder, Jeanelle L.
    Cohen, Rebecca H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 229 (06) : 696 - 698
  • [23] ABORTION TRAINING IN OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY RESIDENCY PROGRAMS IN THE UNITED-STATES, 1991-1992
    MACKAY, HT
    MACKAY, AP
    FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES, 1995, 27 (03): : 112 - 115
  • [24] The Current State of Ultrasound Training in Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Programs
    Alrahmani, Layan
    Codsi, Elisabeth
    Borowski, Kristi S.
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2018, 37 (09) : 2201 - 2207
  • [25] Characteristics of US Abortion Patients Who Obtained Care Out of State Prior to the Overturning of Roe v. Wade
    Axelson, Sarah M.
    Steiner, Riley J.
    Jones, Rachel K.
    WOMENS HEALTH ISSUES, 2024, 34 (02) : 142 - 147
  • [26] Perceptions of Posthysterectomy Cystoscopy Training in Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Programs
    Jacobs, Kristin M.
    Hernandez, Lauren H.
    Thomas, Tonya N.
    Waddell, Leslie M.
    Kavic, Suzanne M.
    Graziano, Scott C.
    FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2015, 21 (02): : 66 - 69
  • [27] The implications of overturning Roe v. Wade on medical education and future physicians
    Traub, Ariana M.
    Mermin-Bunnell, Kellen
    Pareek, Priyasha
    Williams, Sonya
    Connell, Natalie B.
    Kawwass, Jennifer F.
    Cwiak, Carrie
    LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH-AMERICAS, 2022, 14
  • [28] Transparency around abortion training on obstetrics and gynecology residency program websites
    Karlapudi, Aishwarya
    Rible, Radhika
    Vinekar, Kavita
    CONTRACEPTION, 2024, 130
  • [29] Unintended Consequences: Abortion Training in the Years After Roe v Wade
    Aksel, Sarp
    Fein, Lydia
    Ketterer, Em
    Young, Emily
    Backus, Lois
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 103 (03) : 404 - 407
  • [30] MAJORITY OF AMERICANS OPPOSE OVERTURNING ROE V WADE AND BANNING ABORTION OUTRIGHT, POLLS SHOW
    不详
    FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES, 1989, 21 (03): : 138 - 139