Certified organic food production, financial performance, and farm size: An unconditional quantile regression approach

被引:18
|
作者
Khanal, Aditya R. [1 ]
Mishra, Sachin K. [2 ]
Honey, Ummey [3 ]
机构
[1] Tennessee State Univ, Coll Agr, Dept Agr & Environm Sci, 3500 John A Merritt Blvd, Nashville, TN 37209 USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Sch Publ Hlth, Tucson, AZ USA
[3] Tennessee State Univ, Coll Agr, Dept Agr & Environm Sci, Nashville, TN 37209 USA
关键词
Unconditional quantile regression; Certified organic food production; Financial performance; Net cash income; Total value of farm sales; PRODUCTION SYSTEMS; AGRICULTURE; DIVERSIFICATION; DETERMINANTS; SURVIVAL; IMPACT; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.07.012
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Demand for organically produced foods continues to show double-digit growth. However, production of certified organic food in the US has lagged significantly. Hence it provides tremendous scope as well as a challenge for the U.S. organic food production (OFP) sector. This study investigates the impact of farmer's participation in certified OFP on farm financial performance. Using a 2012 nationwide farm-level survey and an unconditional quantile regression (UQR) approach, we find a significant heterogeneous effect of certified OFP across quantiles of farm financial performance measures (i.e., total sales and net cash farm income). Findings show that participation in certified OFP is positive and varies across the unconditional total sales quantile. The marginal impact of participation in certified OFP is higher for farms generating higher sales and net cash income, top three quantiles (75th and up). However, small farms tend to benefit from participation in certified OFP when we use farm sales as performance measure. Finally, UQR estimates show that gender of the operator, off-farm work, marketing contracts, and direct-to-consumer sales have a significant impact on farm financial performance.
引用
收藏
页码:367 / 376
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Corporate social responsibility and corporate performance: a quantile regression approach
    Kang, Hsin-Hong
    Liu, Shu-Bing
    QUALITY & QUANTITY, 2014, 48 (06) : 3311 - 3325
  • [42] The effect of school quality on student performance: A quantile regression approach
    Eide, E
    Showalter, MH
    ECONOMICS LETTERS, 1998, 58 (03) : 345 - 350
  • [43] The role of gender diversity on firm performance: a regression quantile approach
    Solakoglu, M. Nihat
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2013, 20 (17) : 1562 - 1566
  • [44] Diversification and risk-adjusted performance: A quantile regression approach
    Lee, Bong Soo
    Li, Ming-Yuan Leon
    JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2012, 36 (07) : 2157 - 2173
  • [45] Corporate social responsibility and corporate performance: a quantile regression approach
    Hsin-Hong Kang
    Shu-Bing Liu
    Quality & Quantity, 2014, 48 : 3311 - 3325
  • [46] Modeling the effect of off-farm income on farmland values: A quantile regression approach
    Mishra, Ashok K.
    Moss, Charles B.
    ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2013, 32 : 361 - 368
  • [47] Does financial technology matter in the relationship between CSR and banks’ financial stability? a quantile regression approach
    Ines Ben Salah Mahdi
    Mariem Bouaziz
    Mouna Boujelbène Abbes
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31 : 1226 - 1243
  • [48] Does financial technology matter in the relationship between CSR and banks' financial stability? a quantile regression approach
    Mahdi, Ines Ben Salah
    Bouaziz, Mariem
    Abbes, Mouna Boujelbene
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2024, 31 (01) : 1226 - 1243
  • [49] Effects of Firm Size, Financial Leverage and R&D Expenditures on Firm Earnings: An Analysis Using Quantile Regression Approach
    Li, Ming-Yuan Leon
    Hwang, Nen-Chen Richard
    ABACUS-A JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING FINANCE AND BUSINESS STUDIES, 2011, 47 (02): : 182 - 204
  • [50] Dairy farm financial performance: firm, year, and size effects
    Wolf, Christopher A.
    Stephenson, Mark W.
    Knoblauch, Wayne A.
    Novakovic, Andrew M.
    AGRICULTURAL FINANCE REVIEW, 2016, 76 (04) : 532 - 543