Is Supreme Court legitimacy affected by the way justices explain their decisions to the public? Existing work shows a link between legitimacy and case outcomes but often overlooks the impact of opinion content. Using a novel experimental design, the author measures the effect of three different types of judicial arguments on public support for the Court. The results suggest that the rationales used by justices in their opinions can affect institutional legitimacy, but to a lesser degree than conventional wisdom suggests. Taken together with other recent legitimacy research, these findings have important implications and set the stage for follow-up research.
机构:
Univ Missouri Kansas City, Dept Polit Sci, 213 Haag Hall, Kansas City, MO 64110 USAUniv Missouri Kansas City, Dept Polit Sci, 213 Haag Hall, Kansas City, MO 64110 USA
机构:
Penn State Univ, Polit Sci, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
Penn State Univ, Polit Sci & Social Data Analyt, University Pk, PA 16802 USAPenn State Univ, Polit Sci, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
Nelson, Michael J.
Tucker, Patrick D.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Yale Univ, Ctr Study Amer Polit, New Haven, CT 06511 USAPenn State Univ, Polit Sci, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
机构:
Bowling Green State Univ, Bowling Green, OH USABowling Green State Univ, Bowling Green, OH USA
Boston, Joshua
Krewson, Christopher N.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Brigham Young Univ, Provo, UT USA
Brigham Young Univ, Dept Polit Sci, 745 KMBL Brigham Young Univ,701 E Univ PKWY, Provo, UT 84602 USABowling Green State Univ, Bowling Green, OH USA