A multidimensional framework for rating health system performance and sustainability: A nine plus one ranking system

被引:5
|
作者
Mueller, Laura [1 ]
El Oakley, Reida [2 ]
Saad, Mohammed [3 ]
Mokdad, Ali H. [4 ]
Etolhi, Giamal A. [3 ]
Flahault, Antoine [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Geneva, Fac Med, Inst Global, Hlth, Geneva, Switzerland
[2] King Abdel Aziz Specialist Hosp, Cardiac Ctr, At Taif, Saudi Arabia
[3] Libyan Int Med Univ, Benghazi, Libya
[4] Univ Washington, Inst Hlth Metr & Evaluat, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
GLOBAL-HEALTH; ACCREDITATION; SURGERY; QUALITY; CARE;
D O I
10.7189/jogh.11.04025
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Health Care provision in terms of prevention, detection and treatment is primarily dependent on the quality of the hosting Health System. In its health report 2000, the WHO's attempt to assess and rank health systems' quality Worldwide was heavily criticized. We propose a novel framework for health system performance and ranking using three indicators for three domains; general health system performance, clinical outcome of treatment applied to the main causes of death and health system sustainability domains. Methods Each domain was rated as "A - high", "B - intermediate" or "C - poor" according to the aggregate score values of its three indicators. Hence the highest rank a health system can achieve is "AAA" and the lowest is "CCC". If there is a need to define a "numerical rank" to further differentiate health systems with similar rating from one another, the total health expenditure per capita per year was used as an additional "number 10" indicator to achieve that level of differentiation. The framework was applied to Health Systems serving most of the World population including China, India, Brazil, USA, Russia, Germany, Japan, UK, France, Singapore and Switzerland. Data pertinent to each indicator was captured from published reports in peer-reviewed journals and/or from official websites. A Delphi survey was conducted for data not available online. Results Among the 11 health systems tested, no one scored AAA, Switzerland, France, Germany and Japan scored AAB, Singapore scored ABB, UK scored BBB, USA, Russia and China scored BBC, Brazil scored BCC while India scored CCC. Total health expenditure per capita per year lead to ranking Switzerland first followed by France, Germany, and Japan. Conclusion This novel ranking system is a practical and an applicable tool that test health system performance and sustainability. It can be utilized to guide all organizations, people and actions whose primary intent is to promote, restore or maintain health to achieve their targets. An International Health System Ranking database that will be hosted by the Institute of Global, Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Switzerland.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 11
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ERP System Implementation and Sustainability Performance Rating and Reputation Emergent Research Forum (ERF)
    Simmonds, Daphne
    Tadesse, Amanuel Fekade
    Murthy, Uday
    AMCIS 2018 PROCEEDINGS, 2018,
  • [22] Designing and testing a sustainability soft regulation system: rating and ranking the wild animal welfare practices of tourism distribution channels
    Bonilla-Priego, Maria Jesus
    Font, Xavier
    Crabolu, Gloria
    CURRENT ISSUES IN TOURISM, 2024,
  • [23] Rating agencies in the framework of Romanian financial system
    Dudian, Monica
    Dobre, Mihaela Hrisanta
    SECTION 3: MONETARY AND FINANCIAL STRUCTURES IN EAST AND CENTRAL EUROPE: EVALUATIONS IN THE CONTEXT OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION, 2006, : 112 - 114
  • [24] A conceptual framework to measure performance of the public health system
    Handler, A
    Issel, M
    Turnock, B
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2001, 91 (08) : 1235 - 1239
  • [25] Human Performance Optimization: A Framework for the Military Health System
    Travis, Thomas W.
    Brown, David L.
    MILITARY MEDICINE, 2023, 188 : 44 - 48
  • [26] Helpful impacts in group counseling: Development of a multidimensional rating system
    Kivlighan, DM
    Multon, KD
    Brossart, DF
    JOURNAL OF COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 43 (03) : 347 - 355
  • [27] Mechanical System Performance Rating Method
    Goel, Supriya
    Hart, Reid
    Rosenberg, Michael
    ASHRAE JOURNAL, 2023, 65
  • [28] TUNISIAN PENSION SYSTEM SUSTAINABILITY: TOWARDS A MULTIDIMENSIONAL REFORM
    Abdessalem, Tahar
    Cherni, Houyem Chekki
    REGION ET DEVELOPPEMENT, 2016, (44): : 165 - 182
  • [29] Challenges to health system sustainability
    Gorman, Des
    Horn, Murray
    INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2022, 52 (08) : 1300 - 1303
  • [30] Mechanical System Performance Rating Method
    Goel, Supriya
    Hart, Reid
    Rosenberg, Michael
    ASHRAE Journal, 2023, 65 (10) : 32 - 40