A multidimensional framework for rating health system performance and sustainability: A nine plus one ranking system

被引:5
|
作者
Mueller, Laura [1 ]
El Oakley, Reida [2 ]
Saad, Mohammed [3 ]
Mokdad, Ali H. [4 ]
Etolhi, Giamal A. [3 ]
Flahault, Antoine [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Geneva, Fac Med, Inst Global, Hlth, Geneva, Switzerland
[2] King Abdel Aziz Specialist Hosp, Cardiac Ctr, At Taif, Saudi Arabia
[3] Libyan Int Med Univ, Benghazi, Libya
[4] Univ Washington, Inst Hlth Metr & Evaluat, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
GLOBAL-HEALTH; ACCREDITATION; SURGERY; QUALITY; CARE;
D O I
10.7189/jogh.11.04025
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Health Care provision in terms of prevention, detection and treatment is primarily dependent on the quality of the hosting Health System. In its health report 2000, the WHO's attempt to assess and rank health systems' quality Worldwide was heavily criticized. We propose a novel framework for health system performance and ranking using three indicators for three domains; general health system performance, clinical outcome of treatment applied to the main causes of death and health system sustainability domains. Methods Each domain was rated as "A - high", "B - intermediate" or "C - poor" according to the aggregate score values of its three indicators. Hence the highest rank a health system can achieve is "AAA" and the lowest is "CCC". If there is a need to define a "numerical rank" to further differentiate health systems with similar rating from one another, the total health expenditure per capita per year was used as an additional "number 10" indicator to achieve that level of differentiation. The framework was applied to Health Systems serving most of the World population including China, India, Brazil, USA, Russia, Germany, Japan, UK, France, Singapore and Switzerland. Data pertinent to each indicator was captured from published reports in peer-reviewed journals and/or from official websites. A Delphi survey was conducted for data not available online. Results Among the 11 health systems tested, no one scored AAA, Switzerland, France, Germany and Japan scored AAB, Singapore scored ABB, UK scored BBB, USA, Russia and China scored BBC, Brazil scored BCC while India scored CCC. Total health expenditure per capita per year lead to ranking Switzerland first followed by France, Germany, and Japan. Conclusion This novel ranking system is a practical and an applicable tool that test health system performance and sustainability. It can be utilized to guide all organizations, people and actions whose primary intent is to promote, restore or maintain health to achieve their targets. An International Health System Ranking database that will be hosted by the Institute of Global, Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Switzerland.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 11
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Global health - WHO ranking of health system performance
    Jamison, DT
    Sandbu, ME
    SCIENCE, 2001, 293 (5535) : 1595 - 1596
  • [2] A FRAMEWORK FOR DEFINING A SUSTAINABILITY RATING SYSTEM FOR RAILWAY TRACK-BEDS
    Bressi, Sara
    Di Mino, Gaetano
    Lo Presti, Davide
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME JOINT RAIL CONFERENCE, 2017, 2017,
  • [3] A critical review of the effectiveness of the Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS) framework on campus sustainability
    Doocy, Lauren E.
    Zarmehr, Arash
    Kider, Joseph T., Jr.
    PROCEEDINGS OF BUILDING SIMULATION 2021: 17TH CONFERENCE OF IBPSA, 2022, 17 : 629 - 635
  • [4] RATING THE STATES ON HEALTH SYSTEM PERFORMANCE AND UNIVERSAL HEALTH COVERAGE
    Ober, Stacey
    Craven, Gloria
    JOURNAL OF INFUSION NURSING, 2007, 30 (06) : 327 - 328
  • [5] Greenroads: A sustainability rating system for roadways
    Muench, Stephen T.
    Anderson, Jeralee
    Bevan, Tim
    International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 2010, 3 (05) : 270 - 279
  • [6] Framework to evaluate the performance and sustainability of a disperse productive system
    Watanabe, Edson H.
    da Silva, Robson M.
    Blos, Mauricio F.
    Junqueira, Fabricio
    Santos Filho, Diolino J.
    Miyagi, Paulo E.
    JOURNAL OF THE BRAZILIAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING, 2018, 40 (06)
  • [7] Framework to evaluate the performance and sustainability of a disperse productive system
    Edson H. Watanabe
    Robson M. da Silva
    Mauricio F. Blos
    Fabricio Junqueira
    Diolino J. Santos Filho
    Paulo E. Miyagi
    Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 2018, 40
  • [8] Rating Hospital Performance in China: Review of Publicly Available Measures and Development of a Ranking System
    Dong, Shengjie
    Millar, Ross
    Shi, Chenshu
    Dong, Minye
    Xiao, Yuyin
    Shen, Jie
    Fan, Xianqun
    Li, Guohong
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (06)
  • [9] Player ranking in taekwondo: A Bayesian ELO rating system
    Peiris, T.S.N.
    Silva, R.M.
    2020 From Innovation to Impact, FITI 2020, 2020,
  • [10] A COMPARISON OF RANKING AND RATING PROCEDURES FOR VALUE SYSTEM MEASUREMENT
    RANKIN, WL
    GRUBE, JW
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1980, 10 (03) : 233 - 246