A Comprehensive Analysis of Runs of Homozygosity of Eleven Cattle Breeds Representing Different Production Types

被引:44
|
作者
Szmatola, Tomasz [1 ,2 ]
Gurgul, Artur [1 ,2 ]
Jasielczuk, Igor [1 ,2 ]
Zabek, Tomasz [2 ]
Ropka-Molik, Katarzyna [2 ]
Litwinczuk, Zygmunt [3 ]
Bugno-Poniewierska, Monika [4 ]
机构
[1] Agr Univ Krakow, Univ Ctr Vet Med, Al Mickiewicza 24-28, PL-30059 Krakow, Poland
[2] Natl Res Inst Anim Prod, Dept Anim Mol Biol, Krakowska 1, PL-32083 Balice, Poland
[3] Univ Life Sci Lublin, Subdept Cattle Breeding & Genet Resources Conserv, Akad 13, PL-20950 Lublin, Poland
[4] Agr Univ Krakow, Dept Anim Reprod Anat & Genom, Al Mickiewicza 24-28, PL-30059 Krakow, Poland
来源
ANIMALS | 2019年 / 9卷 / 12期
关键词
runs of homozygosity; autozygosity; microarray; cattle; MILK-YIELD; POSITIVE SELECTION; GENE; PROTEIN; GENOME; IDENTIFICATION; AUTOZYGOSITY; TRAITS; FABP4; QTL;
D O I
10.3390/ani9121024
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Runs of homozygosity (ROH) regions are known to be common in the genomes of cattle and have become a subject of interest of various research in recent years. ROH can be used as a valuable tool to estimate inbreeding, which needs to be controlled in livestock populations. Moreover, analysis of ROH is considered to be an effective method of identifying genome regions that are a subject of selection pressure, which may help in understanding the genetic aspects of production traits under selection. In this study, we analyzed ROH characteristics of 11 cattle breeds, both commercial and native, maintained in Poland. We presented distinct differences in the length, quantity and frequency of ROH between the analyzed breeds as well as in the levels of genomic inbreeding. Higher levels of inbreeding were characteristic for commercial breeds, especially beef breeds. In addition, within ROH islands, we observed a number of genes with a confirmed influence on the level of production traits. The presented results and identified genes can be a basis for further research focused on the identification of genes and markers essential in the determination of the most important production traits in cattle. Abstract In the presented research, BovineSNP50 microarrays (Illumina) were applied to determine runs of homozygosity in the genomes of 11 cattle breeds maintained in Poland. These cattle breeds represent three basic utility types: milk, meat and dual purpose. Analysis of runs of homozygosity allowed the evaluation of the level of autozygosity within each breed in order to calculate the genomic inbreeding coefficient (F-ROH), as well as to identify regions of the genome with a high frequency of ROH occurrence, which may reflect traces of directional selectin left in their genomes. Visible differences in the length and distribution of runs of homozygosity in the genomes of the analyzed cattle breeds have been observed. The highest mean number and mean sums of lengths of runs of homozygosity were characteristic for Hereford cattle and intermediate for the Holstein-Friesian Black-and-White variety, Holstein-Friesian Red-and-White variety, Simmental, Limousin, Montbeliarde and Charolais breeds. However, lower values were observed for cattle of conserved breeds. Moreover, the selected livestock differed in the level of inbreeding estimated using the F-ROH coefficient. In regions of the genome with a high frequency of ROH occurrence, which may reflect the impact of directional selection, a number of genes were observed that can be potentially related to the production traits which are under selection pressure for specific production types. The most important detected genes were GHR, MSTN, DGAT1, FABP4, and TRH, with a known influence on the milk and meat traits of the studied cattle breeds.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] THE RESPONSE OF SELECTED BREEDS AND COMMERCIAL TYPES OF FATTENED CATTLE TO LARGE-SCALE PRODUCTION CONDITIONS
    PELECH, O
    BOTTO, V
    ZIVOCISNA VYROBA, 1984, 29 (10): : 897 - 901
  • [42] THE RESPONSES OF DIFFERENT BREEDS AND PRODUCTION TYPES TO MILKING IN PARLOURS WITH AUTOMATIC TERMINATION OF MILKING
    MIHINA, S
    KOVALCIK, K
    ZIVOCISNA VYROBA, 1985, 30 (07): : 609 - 618
  • [43] Comprehensive Analysis of Different Types of Feature Selection
    Qi, Zhanpeng
    4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATICS ENGINEERING AND INFORMATION SCIENCE (ICIEIS2021), 2022, 12161
  • [44] SUITABILITY OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF CATTLE FOR LARGE-SCALE PRODUCTION CONDITIONS
    BOTTO, V
    ZIVOCISNA VYROBA, 1991, 36 (06): : 479 - 488
  • [45] Runs of homozygosity analysis and genomic inbreeding estimation in Sumba Ongole cattle ( Bos indicus ) using a BovineSNP50K BeadChip
    Putra, Widya Pintaka Bayu
    Hartati, Hartati
    Aditama, Redi
    Handiwirawan, Eko
    Margawati, Endang Tri
    Elieser, Simon
    VETERINARY WORLD, 2024, 17 (08) : 1914 - 1919
  • [46] Comparative Analysis of Runs of Homozygosity Islands in Indigenous and Commercial Chickens Revealed Candidate Loci for Disease Resistance and Production Traits
    Mahdabi, Elaheh Rostamzadeh
    Esmailizadeh, Ali
    Han, Jianlin
    Wang, Ming-Shan
    VETERINARY MEDICINE AND SCIENCE, 2025, 11 (01)
  • [47] MILK-PRODUCTION OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF CATTLE IN SELECTED LARGE-SCALE PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGY
    BERAN, J
    ZIVOCISNA VYROBA, 1982, 27 (02): : 151 - 160
  • [48] Milk fat globules in different dairy cattle breeds Part I: morphometric analysis
    Martini, M.
    Cecchi, F.
    Scolozzi, C.
    Leotta, R.
    Verita, P.
    ITALIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2003, 2 : 272 - 274
  • [49] Genome-wide detection for runs of homozygosity analysis in three pig breeds from Chinese Taihu Basin and Landrace pigs by SLAF- seq data
    Tong, Shi-feng
    Mo, Zhu
    Rui, Xie
    Li, Dong-feng
    Zhang, Li-fan
    Yang, Liu
    JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE AGRICULTURE, 2022, 21 (11) : 3293 - 3301
  • [50] Genome-wide detection for runs of homozygosity analysis in three pig breeds from Chinese Taihu Basin and Landrace pigs by SLAF-seq data
    TONG Shi-feng
    ZHU Mo
    XIE Rui
    LI Dong-feng
    ZHANG Li-fan
    LIU Yang
    Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21 (11) : 3293 - 3301