Effect of parameters on retention behavior of ovalbumin and immunoglobulin E in asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation

被引:0
|
作者
Liang, Qihui [1 ,2 ]
Li, Yang [1 ,2 ]
Zou, Yue [2 ]
Shu, Lin [2 ]
Han, Nanyin [2 ]
Yang, Yi [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Ctr Dis Prevent & Control, Beijing Key Lab Diagnost & Traceabil Technol Food, 16 Hepingli Middle St, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Sch Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Chem Biol, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
aggregation; asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation; immunoglobulin E; ovalbumin; resolution;
D O I
10.1002/sscp.202200075
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation is a rising useful technique to separate and characterize macromolecules. Elution behaviors of allergen protein ovalbumin and immunoglobulin E were studied here. Effects of flow rates, kinds of carrier solutions, and injection amounts were investigated in the desire to experiment and verify the effect of every factor and to validate asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation theory. Results suggested that cross-flow is the most important factor among all the factors that have been studied. Too-low focus flow (0.5 ml/min) and outflow (0.4 ml/min) are harmful for protein separation and characterization. Smaller size ovalbumin (with a monomer is 11.4 nm) is more prone to be influenced compared with the bigger analyte immunoglobulin E (with a monomer diameter is 32.1 nm) by flow rates. The adopted types of carrier fluids did not change the retention behavior of the two proteins. Still, protein aggregation and membrane adsorption should be paid more attention to under different carrier fluids.
引用
收藏
页码:636 / 644
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Miniaturization of frit inlet asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation
    Kang, DJ
    Moon, MH
    ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2004, 76 (13) : 3851 - 3855
  • [22] Characterization of Nanoparticle Diameter by Asymmetrical Flow Field-Flow Fractionation
    Liu Pan-Pan
    Quan Can
    Li Hong-Mei
    Jin Jun-Su
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2013, 41 (07) : 1063 - 1068
  • [23] Asymmetrical Flow Field-Flow Fractionation as a Method to Study the Behavior of Humic Acids in Solution
    Schimpf, M. E.
    Wahlund, K.-G.
    Journal of Microcolumn Separation, 9 (07):
  • [24] Asymmetrical Flow Field-Flow Fractionation as a Method to Study the Behavior of Humic Acids in Solution
    Schimpf, Martin E.
    Wahlund, Karl-Gustav
    Journal of Microcolumn Separations, 9 (07): : 535 - 543
  • [25] RETENTION BEHAVIOR OF COLLOIDAL DISPERSIONS IN SEDIMENTATION FIELD-FLOW FRACTIONATION
    MORI, Y
    ADVANCES IN COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE, 1994, 53 : 129 - 140
  • [26] Characterization and differential retention of Q beta bacteriophage virus-like particles using cyclical electrical field-flow fractionation and asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation
    Shiri, Farhad
    Petersen, Kevin E.
    Romanov, Valentin
    Zou, Qin
    Gale, Bruce K.
    ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2020, 412 (07) : 1563 - 1572
  • [27] Field and flow programming in frit-inlet asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation
    Moon, MH
    Williams, PS
    Kang, DJ
    Hwang, I
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2002, 955 (02) : 263 - 272
  • [28] Flow optimisations with increased channel thickness in asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation
    Yang, Joon Seon
    Moon, Myeong Hee
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2018, 1581 : 100 - 104
  • [29] Continuous asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation for the purification of proteins and nanoparticles
    Marioli, Maria
    Kok, Wim Th
    SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 242
  • [30] Nanoparticle separation with a miniaturized asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation cartridge
    Mueller, David
    Cattaneo, Stefano
    Meier, Florian
    Welz, Roland
    de Mello, Andrew J.
    FRONTIERS IN CHEMISTRY, 2015, 3