Effect of parameters on retention behavior of ovalbumin and immunoglobulin E in asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation

被引:0
|
作者
Liang, Qihui [1 ,2 ]
Li, Yang [1 ,2 ]
Zou, Yue [2 ]
Shu, Lin [2 ]
Han, Nanyin [2 ]
Yang, Yi [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Ctr Dis Prevent & Control, Beijing Key Lab Diagnost & Traceabil Technol Food, 16 Hepingli Middle St, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Sch Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Chem Biol, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
aggregation; asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation; immunoglobulin E; ovalbumin; resolution;
D O I
10.1002/sscp.202200075
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation is a rising useful technique to separate and characterize macromolecules. Elution behaviors of allergen protein ovalbumin and immunoglobulin E were studied here. Effects of flow rates, kinds of carrier solutions, and injection amounts were investigated in the desire to experiment and verify the effect of every factor and to validate asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation theory. Results suggested that cross-flow is the most important factor among all the factors that have been studied. Too-low focus flow (0.5 ml/min) and outflow (0.4 ml/min) are harmful for protein separation and characterization. Smaller size ovalbumin (with a monomer is 11.4 nm) is more prone to be influenced compared with the bigger analyte immunoglobulin E (with a monomer diameter is 32.1 nm) by flow rates. The adopted types of carrier fluids did not change the retention behavior of the two proteins. Still, protein aggregation and membrane adsorption should be paid more attention to under different carrier fluids.
引用
收藏
页码:636 / 644
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An assessment of retention behavior for gold nanorods in asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation
    El Hadri, Hind
    Gigault, Julien
    Tan, Jiaojie
    Hackley, Vincent A.
    ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2018, 410 (27) : 6977 - 6984
  • [2] An assessment of retention behavior for gold nanorods in asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation
    Hind El Hadri
    Julien Gigault
    Jiaojie Tan
    Vincent A. Hackley
    Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2018, 410 : 6977 - 6984
  • [3] Retention ratio and nonequilibrium bandspreading in asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation
    P. Stephen Williams
    Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2015, 407 : 4327 - 4338
  • [4] Retention ratio and nonequilibrium bandspreading in asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation
    Williams, P. Stephen
    ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2015, 407 (15) : 4327 - 4338
  • [5] Optimization of Asymmetrical Flow Field-Flow Fractionation
    Qureshi, Rashid N.
    Kok, Wim Th
    LC GC NORTH AMERICA, 2011, 29 (01) : 76 - +
  • [6] Retention and efficiency in frit-inlet asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation
    Moon, MH
    Williams, PS
    Kwon, H
    ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1999, 71 (14) : 2657 - 2666
  • [7] Fractionation of humic substances by asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation
    Yohannes, G
    Wiedmer, SK
    Jussila, M
    Riekkola, ML
    CHROMATOGRAPHIA, 2005, 61 (7-8) : 359 - 364
  • [8] Impact of carrier flow composition on membrane adsorption and aggregation of ovalbumin in asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation
    Liang Qihui
    Yang Yi
    Shao Bing
    Gao Ye
    Song Yu
    Han Nanyin
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY, 2018, 36 (05) : 480 - 486
  • [9] Fractionation of Humic Substances by Asymmetrical Flow Field-Flow Fractionation
    G. Yohannes
    S. K. Wiedmer
    M. Jussila
    M.-L. Riekkola
    Chromatographia, 2005, 61 : 359 - 364
  • [10] Determination of the functioning parameters in asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation with an exponential channel
    Dejardin, P.
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2013, 1305 : 213 - 220