Life cycle assessment of engineered nanomaterials: State of the art and strategies to overcome existing gaps

被引:151
|
作者
Hischier, Roland [1 ]
Walser, Tobias [2 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Labs Mat Sci & Technol Empa, TSL, CH-9014 St Gallen, Switzerland
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Environm Engn, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Life Cycle Assessment; LCA; Engineered nanomaterials; Carbon nanotubes; Nanocomposite; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; EXPOSURE; NANOTECHNOLOGY; NANOPARTICLES; PARTICLES; SUSTAINABILITY; ENVIRONMENT; FATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.03.001
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The use of engineered nanomaterials offers advantages as well as disadvantages from a sustainability perspective. It is important to identify such points as early as possible in order to be able to build on existing strengths, while counteracting disadvantages. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a suitable method to assess the environmental performance of a product or process. But so far studies applying LCA to the area of nanotechnology have been scarce. One reason might be that the LCA framework has a whole list of issues that need further precision in order to be applicable to nanotechnologies: system boundaries and a functional unit have to be chosen in a way that allows one to do a comparison of equal functionalities; adequate and comprehensive life cycle inventory data for engineered nanomaterials are the key on the level of inventory analysis; and the impact assessment step requires a clear definition of the degree of detail on the level of nanoparticle emissions. The LCA studies existing thus far in the area of nanotechnology have barely begun to cover all these aspects. Thus, in order to improve the current situation, the authors propose to go ahead in each of the LCA stages as far as scientific advances allow. For the inventory modelling this means e.g. that comprehensive, transparently documented and quality ensured data of the most important engineered nanomaterials should be collected and made available in a widely-accepted format. Concerning nanoparticle emissions, as many parameters as possible have to be collected pertaining to the production, use, and the disposal phase of these engineered nanomaterials. Furthermore, on the level of impact assessment, relevant physical characteristics have to be identified for a toxicity assessment of nanoparticles and a consensus has to be found for a limited but sufficient number of independent parameters influencing toxicity to be collected. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 282
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Life-Cycle Assessment of Seismic Retrofit Strategies Applied to Existing Building Structures
    Vitiello, Umberto
    Salzano, Antonio
    Asprone, Domenico
    Di Ludovico, Marco
    Prota, Andrea
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (12) : 1 - 18
  • [22] Research highlights: applications of life-cycle assessment as a tool for characterizing environmental impacts of engineered nanomaterials
    Gallagher, Miranda J.
    Allen, Caley
    Buchman, Joseph T.
    Qiu, Tian A.
    Clement, Peter L.
    Krause, Miriam O. P.
    Gilbertson, Leanne M.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-NANO, 2017, 4 (02) : 276 - 281
  • [23] Integrating life cycle assessment into managing potential EHS risks of engineered nanomaterials: reviewing progress to date
    William C. Walker
    Christopher J. Bosso
    Matthew Eckelman
    Jacqueline A. Isaacs
    Leila Pourzahedi
    [J]. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 2015, 17
  • [24] Integrating life cycle assessment into managing potential EHS risks of engineered nanomaterials: reviewing progress to date
    Walker, William C.
    Bosso, Christopher J.
    Eckelman, Matthew
    Isaacs, Jacqueline A.
    Pourzahedi, Leila
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, 2015, 17 (08)
  • [25] Life cycle assessment of microalgal biorefinery: A state-of-the-art review
    Ubando, Aristotle T.
    Ng, Earle Anderson S.
    Chen, Wei-Hsin
    Culaba, Alvin B.
    Kwon, Eilhann E.
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 360
  • [26] Global state of the art of teaching life cycle assessment in higher education
    Viere, Tobias
    Lehmann, Joshua
    Miao, Zoe Chunyu
    Harding, Kevin
    Strothmann, Philip
    Weyand, Steffi
    Wright, Laurie
    Chitaka, Takunda Y.
    Sonnemann, Guido
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2024, 29 (07): : 1290 - 1302
  • [27] Economic Allocation in Life Cycle Assessment The State of the Art and Discussion of Examples
    Ardente, Fulvio
    Cellura, Maurizio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2012, 16 (03) : 387 - 398
  • [28] State-of-the-art and limitations in the life cycle assessment of ionic liquids
    Maciel, Vinicius Goncalves
    Wales, Dominic J.
    Seferin, Marcus
    Lie Ugaya, Cassia Maria
    Sans, Victor
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 217 : 844 - 858
  • [29] Building rehabilitation life cycle assessment methodology-state of the art
    Thibodeau, Charles
    Bataille, Alain
    Sie, Marion
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2019, 103 : 408 - 422
  • [30] Life cycle assessment of bioenergy systems: State of the art and future challenges
    Cherubini, Francesco
    Stromman, Anders Hammer
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 102 (02) : 437 - 451