Relative Safety and Efficacy of Two Doses of Tandospirone Citrate for Generalized Anxiety Disorder: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:3
|
作者
Li, Qingwei [1 ]
Zhang, Haiyin [2 ]
Lin, Guozhen [3 ]
Shi, Shenxun [4 ]
Zhang, Yingli [5 ]
Ji, Jianlin [6 ]
Yang, Lipeng [7 ]
Yao, Jun [1 ]
Wu, Wenyuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Tongji Hosp, Dept Psychiat, Sch Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Mental Hlth Ctr, Clin Psychol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Ruijin Hosp, Dept Psychiat, Sch Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Fudan Univ, Huashan Hosp, Psychiat Dept, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[5] Shenzhen Kangning Hosp, Shenzhen Mental Hlth Ctr, Dept Depress Disorders, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[6] Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Dept Psychol Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[7] Tsinghua Univ, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hosp, Sch Clin Med, Dept Neurol, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
generalized anxiety disorder; tandospirone; randomized controlled trial; safety; efficacy; DOUBLE-BLIND; SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION; MENTAL-DISORDERS; PLACEBO; PREVALENCE; SERTRALINE; SYMPTOMS; CHINA;
D O I
10.2147/NDT.S366048
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: To determine the relative safety and efficacy of different doses of tandospirone in treating generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Patients and Methods: This parallel randomized controlled trial enrolled patients with GAD from eight centers in China. The patients were randomly assigned to 60 mg/day or 30 mg/day tandospirone groups. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate after receiving 6-week treatment. The secondary endpoints included significant response rate, clinical recovery rate, change in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) total score, HAMA subscale score, Hamilton Depression Scale-17 (HAMD-17), Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scale (CGI-S) score, and Impression-Improvement scale (CGI-I) score.Results: No significant difference was found in the overall response rate between the two groups (65.7% vs 58.4%, p = 0.213). A higher significant response rate and change in the HAMA total score were found in the 60 mg/day group. The reduction in the CGI-S score and percentage of patients with a CGI-I score of <= 2 were higher in 60 mg/day group. The reduction in HAMA somatic anxiety factor, cardiovascular symptom factor, gastrointestinal symptom factor, and HAMD-17 score were more significant in the 60 mg/day group. The incidence of total adverse events was higher in the 60 mg/day group than in the 30 mg/day group. No significant difference was found in the proportion of withdrawal due to adverse events.Conclusion: Both 60 mg/day and 30 mg/day tandospirone show good efficacy in treating patients with GAD. High doses of tandospirone may have advantages in relieving the somatic symptoms but also present disadvantages due to their high level.
引用
收藏
页码:1653 / 1664
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Randomized Study of Efficacy and Safety of Ocinaplon (DOV 273,547) in Generalized Anxiety Disorder
    Pal Czobor
    Skolnick, Phil
    Beer, Bernard
    Lippa, Arnold
    CNS NEUROSCIENCE & THERAPEUTICS, 2010, 16 (02) : 63 - 75
  • [22] Efficacy and Safety of Vilazodone in Patients With Generalized Anxiety Disorder: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Flexible-Dose Trial
    Durgam, Suresh
    Gommoll, Carl
    Forero, Giovanna
    Nunez, Rene
    Tang, Xiongwen
    Mathews, Maju
    Sheehan, David V.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 77 (12) : 1687 - 1694
  • [23] Efficacy and safety of duloxetine in the treatment of older adult patients with generalized anxiety disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
    Alaka, Karla J.
    Noble, William
    Montejo, Angel
    Duenas, Hector
    Munshi, Autar
    Strawn, Jeffrey R.
    Lenox-Smith, Alan
    Ahl, Jonna
    Bidzan, Leszek
    Dorn, Brita
    Ball, Susan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 29 (09) : 978 - 986
  • [24] A PHASE-II MULTICENTER DOSE-FINDING, EFFICACY AND SAFETY TRIAL OF IPSAPIRONE IN OUTPATIENTS WITH GENERALIZED ANXIETY DISORDER
    CUTLER, NR
    HESSELINK, JMK
    SRAMEK, JJ
    PROGRESS IN NEURO-PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY & BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1994, 18 (03): : 447 - 463
  • [25] Interpretation Training in Individuals With Generalized Social Anxiety Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Amir, Nader
    Taylor, Charles T.
    JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 80 (03) : 497 - 511
  • [26] A randomized controlled trial of venlafaxine extended release in generalized social anxiety disorder
    Liebowitz, MR
    Mangano, RM
    Bradwejn, J
    Asnis, G
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 66 (02) : 238 - 247
  • [27] Randomized Controlled Trial of Mindfulness Meditation for Generalized Anxiety Disorder: Effects on Anxiety and Stress Reactivity
    Hoge, Elizabeth A.
    Bui, Eric
    Marques, Luana
    Metcalf, Christina A.
    Morris, Laura K.
    Robinaugh, Donald J.
    Worthington, John J.
    Pollack, Mark H.
    Simon, Naomi M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2013, 74 (08) : 786 - 792
  • [28] Efficacy and Safety of Curcumin in Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Sanmukhani, Jayesh
    Satodia, Vimal
    Trivedi, Jaladhi
    Patel, Tejas
    Tiwari, Deepak
    Panchal, Bharat
    Goel, Ajay
    Tripathi, Chandra Bhanu
    PHYTOTHERAPY RESEARCH, 2014, 28 (04) : 579 - 585
  • [29] Efficacy of the 5-HT1A Agonist Tandospirone Citrate in Improving Symptoms of Patients With Functional Dyspepsia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Miwa, Hiroto
    Nagahara, A.
    Tominaga, K.
    Yokoyama, T.
    Sawada, Y.
    Inoue, K.
    Ashida, Kiyoshi
    Fukuchi, T.
    Hojo, M.
    Yamashita, H.
    Tomita, T.
    Hori, K.
    Oshima, T.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 104 (11): : 2779 - 2787
  • [30] Safety and efficacy of aviandr in patients with generalized anxiety disorder: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding, pilot study
    Ivashchenko, Andrey A.
    Morozova, Margarita A.
    V. Vostokova, Natalia
    Beniashvily, Allan G.
    Bukhanovskaya, Olga A.
    Burminskiy, Denis S.
    Egorova, Alina N.
    Gluskina, Lubov Y.
    Gorchakov, Dmitriy S.
    Karapetian, Ruben N.
    Kasimova, Lala N.
    V. Kravchenko, Dmitry
    Lepilkina, Taissia A.
    Merkulova, Elena A.
    Mitkin, Oleg D.
    Penchul, Nataliya A.
    Potanin, Sergey S.
    Rupchev, George E.
    V. Ivachtchenko, Alexandre
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2021, 143 : 436 - 444