Use of ulipristal acetate and levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: a follow-up study

被引:7
|
作者
Baird, Aisling Susan [1 ]
Trussell, James [2 ]
Webb, Anne [1 ]
机构
[1] Liverpool Community Hlth, Abacus Community Sexual Hlth Serv, Sexual & Reprod Hlth, Liverpool L1 4AP, Merseyside, England
[2] Princeton Univ, Off Populat Res, Econ & Publ Affairs, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
关键词
COST-EFFECTIVENESS;
D O I
10.1136/jfprhc-2013-100733
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Objectives Previously we showed that increasing the choice of emergency contraception (EC) guided by medical eligibility did not result in wholesale large-scale usage of ulipristal acetate (UPA). This further 12-month study aimed to answer three questions. (1) Does offering choice of EC lead to change in methods used? (2) Are women who choose UPA more likely than those who choose levonorgestrel (LNG) to continue using condoms for subsequent contraception or to decline any ongoing contraception? (3) Do more women choosing LNG 'quick start' hormonal contraception? Methods A retrospective study of EC episodes (1 April 2012 to 31 March 2013) by quarters. Among women offered all three methods of EC (49.1%) we noted the method chosen, and decisions on ongoing contraception among those choosing either LNG or UPA. Differences were tested for statistical significance. Results In 6110 episodes of EC, LNG was issued in 69.2%, UPA in 26.0%, and a copper intrauterine device (Cu-IUD) was fitted in 4.8%. Quarter by quarter, the data show a small decline in LNG use, suggesting plateauing by the last quarter, and a significant increase in UPA use between the first and the other three quarters (p<0.001). Use of the Cu-IUD remained static. The percentage of women offered three methods rose to 54.2%. In women offered full choice (3000; 49.1%) we saw a significant increase in choice of UPA, from 39.3% to 48.6% (p<0.001). Women who chose LNG were more likely to quick start (p=0.02) or be continuing contraception already used (p<0.001). Overall, those choosing UPA were more likely to use condoms (p<0.001) but were no more likely to decline ongoing contraception (p=0.13). Conclusions There was a significant increase in women using UPA for EC compared with our previous study, particularly among those wishing to use condoms for continuing contraception. Women choosing LNG were more likely to quick start pills or to continue current hormonal contraception. Detailed attention to continuing contraception following EC may be an important factor in the prevention of unwanted pregnancy.
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 121
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Safety data for levonorgestrel, ulipristal acetate and Yuzpe regimens for emergency contraception
    Jatlaoui, Tara C.
    Riley, Halley
    Curtis, Kathryn M.
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2016, 93 (02) : 93 - 112
  • [2] ULIPRISTAL ACETATE FOR EMERGENCY CONTRACEPTION
    Russo, J. A.
    Creinin, M. D.
    [J]. DRUGS OF TODAY, 2010, 46 (09) : 655 - 660
  • [3] Ulipristal acetate for emergency contraception?
    Page, Geert Herman
    Verhaeghe, Veerle
    [J]. LANCET, 2010, 375 (9726): : 1608 - 1608
  • [4] Ulipristal Acetate for Emergency Contraception
    Snow, Sara E.
    Melillo, Stephanie N.
    Jarvis, Courtney I.
    [J]. ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2011, 45 (06) : 780 - 786
  • [5] Ulipristal acetate emergency contraception
    Davies, Graham
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FAMILY PLANNING AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, 2013, 39 (01): : 61 - 61
  • [6] Menstruation behavior after use of emergency contraception: Ulipristal acetate versus levonorgestrel in women of reproductive age
    Stanoulov, G.
    Bourazan, Chalil A.
    Tsikouras, P.
    [J]. GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2020, 80 (10) : E233 - E234
  • [7] Ulipristal Acetate A Review of Its Use in Emergency Contraception
    McKeage, Kate
    Croxtall, Jamie D.
    [J]. DRUGS, 2011, 71 (07) : 935 - 945
  • [8] Ulipristal acetate: A guide to its use in emergency contraception
    Scott L.J.
    McKeage K.
    Croxtall J.D.
    [J]. Drugs & Therapy Perspectives, 2012, 28 (2) : 6 - 9
  • [9] THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF EMERGENCY HORMONAL CONTRACEPTION WITH ULIPRISTAL ACETATE VERSUS LEVONORGESTREL FOR MINORS IN FRANCE
    Schmid, R.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (07) : A510 - A510
  • [10] The Cost-Effectiveness of Emergency Hormonal Contraception with Ulipristal Acetate versus Levonorgestrel for Minors in France
    Schmid, Ramona
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (09):