Effect of antenatal detection of small-for-gestational-age newborns in a risk stratified retrospective cohort

被引:7
|
作者
Kajdy, Anna [1 ]
Modzelewski, Jan [1 ]
Jakubiak, Monika [1 ]
Pokropek, Artur [2 ]
Rabijewski, Michal [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Postgrad Med Educ, Dept Reprod Hlth, Warsaw, Poland
[2] Polish Acad Sci, Inst Philosophy & Sociol, Warsaw, Poland
来源
PLOS ONE | 2019年 / 14卷 / 10期
关键词
FETAL-GROWTH RESTRICTION; POPULATION; MANAGEMENT; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0224553
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective Small-for-gestational-age (SGA) are neonates born with birth weight below the 10th centile for a given week of pregnancy. It is a risk factor of perinatal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. There is an ongoing debate whether prenatal detection of SGA neonates is good predictor of perinatal outcome especially in low risk populations. Our primary aim was to compare the odds ratios for unfavorable outcome in a risk stratified cohort of SGA neonates in regard to prenatal detection status. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study analysing the effect of prenatal detection on perinatal outcome. This cohort has been divided into a predefined low-risk and high-risk population. Electronic records of 39,032 singleton deliveries from 2010 through 2016 were analysed. SGA was defined as newborn weight below the 10th percentile on the Fenton growth chart. Detected SGA (dSGA) neonates were those that were admitted for delivery with a prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of abnormal growth. Undetected SGA (uSGA) were neonates that were found to be below the 10th percentile after birth. Perinatal and neonatal outcome was compared. Results The detection rate in high-risk pregnancies was almost 45.7% versus low risk where it amounted to 18.9%. In both the high-risk and low-risk populations there was a significantly higher risk of composite mortality for undetected SGA compared to approporiate-for-gestational-age (AGA) (OR 7.95 CI 4.76-13.29; OR 14.4 CI 4.99-41.45 respectively). The odds for the composite neonatal outcome were significantly higher for dSGA and uSGA than for AGA in all the studied populations except for the uSGA in high risk population (OR 1.57 CI 0.97-3.53). Importantly, there was not a single case of intrauterine fetal death among detected SGA, in the low risk group. Conclusions Prenatal detection of SGA status is related to perinatal outcomes, especially mortality. Therefore, assessment of SGA status even in low-risk pregnancies could help predict potential perinatal and neonatal complications.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Early-Onset Thrombocytopenia in Small-For-Gestational-Age Neonates: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Fustolo-Gunnink, S. F.
    Vlug, R. D.
    Smits-Wintjens, V. E. H. J.
    Heckman, E. J.
    te Pas, A. B.
    Fijnvandraat, K.
    Lopriore, E.
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (05):
  • [22] Antenatal Corticosteroids for Small for Gestational Age in Late Preterm Newborns
    Zloto, Keren
    Krispin, Eyal
    Shmueli, Anat
    Hadar, Eran
    Salman, Lina
    ISRAEL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2023, 25 (10): : 683 - 687
  • [23] Does the antenatal detection of small-for-gestational-age babies influence their two-year outcomes?
    Ogundipe, EM
    Wolfe, CDA
    Seed, P
    Gamsu, HR
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2000, 17 (02) : 73 - 81
  • [24] ANTENATAL DETECTION OF SMALL-FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE BABIES - CHOICE OF A SYMPHYSIS-FUNDUS GROWTH CURVE
    PATTINSON, RC
    SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1988, 74 (06): : 282 - 283
  • [25] Improving antenatal detection of small-for-gestational-age fetus: economic evaluation of Growth Assessment Protocol
    Relph, S.
    Vieira, M. C.
    Copas, A.
    Coxon, K.
    Alagna, A.
    Briley, A.
    Johnson, M.
    Page, L.
    Peebles, D.
    Shennan, A.
    Thilaganathan, B.
    Marlow, N.
    Lees, C.
    Lawlor, D. A.
    Khalil, A.
    Sandall, J.
    Pasupathy, D.
    Healey, A.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 60 (05) : 620 - 631
  • [26] Exposure to Anti-Infective Drugs during Pregnancy and the Risk of Small-for-Gestational-Age Newborns
    Santos, Fabiano
    Sheehy, Odile
    Perreault, Sylvie
    Ferreira, Ema
    Berard, Anick
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2010, 19 : S208 - S208
  • [27] Antenatal Corticosteroids in Preterm Small-for-Gestational-Age Infants: What Is The Evidence?
    Thiele, C.
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 58 : 78 - 78
  • [28] Small-for-gestational-age newborns need a special fluid therapy strategy
    Tonbul, Alparslan
    Tayman, Cueneyt
    Karadag, Ahmet
    Akca, Halise
    Uras, Nurdan
    Tatli, Mustafa Mansur
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2010, 40 (02) : 185 - 190
  • [29] Mode of Delivery and Neonatal Outcomes in Preterm, Small-for-Gestational-Age Newborns
    Werner, Erika F.
    Savitz, David A.
    Janevic, Teresa M.
    Ehsanipoor, Robert M.
    Thung, Stephen F.
    Funai, Edmund F.
    Lipkind, Heather S.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 120 (03): : 560 - 564
  • [30] THE DIFFERENCES IN GROWTH OF CEREBELLAR VERMIS BETWEEN APPROPRIATE-FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE AND SMALL-FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE NEWBORNS
    HUANG, CC
    LIU, CC
    EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 1993, 33 (01) : 9 - 19