Effect of antenatal detection of small-for-gestational-age newborns in a risk stratified retrospective cohort

被引:7
|
作者
Kajdy, Anna [1 ]
Modzelewski, Jan [1 ]
Jakubiak, Monika [1 ]
Pokropek, Artur [2 ]
Rabijewski, Michal [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Postgrad Med Educ, Dept Reprod Hlth, Warsaw, Poland
[2] Polish Acad Sci, Inst Philosophy & Sociol, Warsaw, Poland
来源
PLOS ONE | 2019年 / 14卷 / 10期
关键词
FETAL-GROWTH RESTRICTION; POPULATION; MANAGEMENT; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0224553
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective Small-for-gestational-age (SGA) are neonates born with birth weight below the 10th centile for a given week of pregnancy. It is a risk factor of perinatal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. There is an ongoing debate whether prenatal detection of SGA neonates is good predictor of perinatal outcome especially in low risk populations. Our primary aim was to compare the odds ratios for unfavorable outcome in a risk stratified cohort of SGA neonates in regard to prenatal detection status. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study analysing the effect of prenatal detection on perinatal outcome. This cohort has been divided into a predefined low-risk and high-risk population. Electronic records of 39,032 singleton deliveries from 2010 through 2016 were analysed. SGA was defined as newborn weight below the 10th percentile on the Fenton growth chart. Detected SGA (dSGA) neonates were those that were admitted for delivery with a prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of abnormal growth. Undetected SGA (uSGA) were neonates that were found to be below the 10th percentile after birth. Perinatal and neonatal outcome was compared. Results The detection rate in high-risk pregnancies was almost 45.7% versus low risk where it amounted to 18.9%. In both the high-risk and low-risk populations there was a significantly higher risk of composite mortality for undetected SGA compared to approporiate-for-gestational-age (AGA) (OR 7.95 CI 4.76-13.29; OR 14.4 CI 4.99-41.45 respectively). The odds for the composite neonatal outcome were significantly higher for dSGA and uSGA than for AGA in all the studied populations except for the uSGA in high risk population (OR 1.57 CI 0.97-3.53). Importantly, there was not a single case of intrauterine fetal death among detected SGA, in the low risk group. Conclusions Prenatal detection of SGA status is related to perinatal outcomes, especially mortality. Therefore, assessment of SGA status even in low-risk pregnancies could help predict potential perinatal and neonatal complications.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Antenatal detection and surveillance of pregnancies at risk of small-for-gestational-age
    Ling, Zen H.
    Samarage, H.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2021, 128 : 46 - 46
  • [2] Comparison of risk factors for small-for-gestational-age and preterm in a Portuguese cohort of newborns
    Rodrigues, Teresa
    Barros, Henrique
    [J]. MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH JOURNAL, 2007, 11 (05) : 417 - 424
  • [3] Comparison of Risk Factors for Small-for-Gestational-Age and Preterm in a Portuguese Cohort of Newborns
    Teresa Rodrigues
    Henrique Barros
    [J]. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 2007, 11 : 417 - 424
  • [4] Maternal Risk Factors for Small-for-Gestational-Age Newborns in Mexico: Analysis of a Nationwide Representative Cohort
    Suarez-Idueta, L.
    Bedford, Cortina-Borja
    Ohuma, E. O.
    Cortina-Borja, M.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 9
  • [5] ABC OF ANTENATAL CARE - SMALL-FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE
    CHAMBERLAIN, G
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1991, 302 (6792): : 1592 - 1596
  • [6] Small-for-gestational-age as a risk factor for stillbirth: effect of gestational age
    Tahera, F.
    Thilaganathan, B.
    Bhide, A.
    Papageorghiou, A.
    Khalil, A.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2016, 123 : 58 - 58
  • [7] Correlation of toxoplasmosis with small-for-gestational-age newborns
    Hurt, Karel
    Kodym, Petr
    Stejskal, David
    Cihar, Martin
    Rakovic, Jakub
    Zikan, Michal
    [J]. BRATISLAVA MEDICAL JOURNAL-BRATISLAVSKE LEKARSKE LISTY, 2024, 125 (02): : 92 - 95
  • [8] Genetic Analyses in Small-for-Gestational-Age Newborns
    Stalman, Susanne E.
    Solanky, Nita
    Ishida, Miho
    Aleman-Charlet, Cristina
    Abu-Amero, Sayeda
    Alders, Marielle
    Alvizi, Lucas
    Baird, William
    Demetriou, Charalambos
    Henneman, Peter
    James, Chela
    Knegt, Lia C.
    Leon, Lydia J.
    Mannens, Marcel M. A. M.
    Mul, Adi N.
    Nibbering, Nicole A.
    Peskett, Emma
    Rezwan, Faisal I.
    Ris-Stalpers, Carrie
    van der Post, Joris A. M.
    Kamp, Gerdine A.
    Plotz, Frans B.
    Wit, Jan M.
    Stanier, Philip
    Moore, Gudrun E.
    Hennekam, Raoul C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2018, 103 (03): : 917 - 925
  • [9] Small-for-gestational-age as a risk factor for stillbirth: Effect of gestational age
    Tahera, F.
    Thilaganathan, B.
    Bhide, A.
    Papageorghiou, A.
    Khalil, A.
    Dhother, J.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2016, 123 : 92 - 93
  • [10] In-hospital outcomes in preterm and small-for-gestational-age newborns: a cohort study
    Costa, Lo-Ruama Pereira
    Moraes Costa, Gleise Aparecida
    Sobrinho Valete, Cristina Ortiz
    Kobol Machado, Jose Kleber
    da Silva, Mariliza Henrique
    [J]. EINSTEIN-SAO PAULO, 2022, 20 : eAO6781