Why women with previous caesarean and eligible for a trial of labour have an elective repeat caesarean delivery? A national study in France

被引:15
|
作者
Bartolo, S. [1 ]
Goffinet, F. [1 ,2 ]
Blondel, B. [1 ]
Deneux-Tharaux, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Paris Descartes Univ, Obstet Perinatal & Pediat Epidemiol Res Team EPOP, Ctr Epidemiol & Stat Sorbonne Paris Cite CRESS, INSERM,UMR 1153,DHU Risks Pregnancy, Paris, France
[2] Paris Descartes Univ, Cochin Hosp, APHP, Port Royal Matern Unit,DHU Risks Pregnancy, Paris, France
关键词
Caesarean delivery; determinants; previous caesarean; repeat caesarean section; route of delivery; VAGINAL BIRTH; ROBSON CLASSIFICATION; SECTION; PREDICTION; OBESITY; WEIGHT; MODE; GUIDELINES; REDUCE; RATES;
D O I
10.1111/1471-0528.14056
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
ObjectiveTo identify the characteristics of women and maternity units associated with elective repeat caesarean delivery (ERCD) in women eligible for trial of labour after caesarean (TOLAC). DesignCross-sectional study. SettingFrance. Population and sampleUsing data from the 2010 French National Perinatal Survey, a representative sample of births in France (n = 14 681 women), we studied two groups of women with prior caesarean section: (i) women eligible for TOLAC according to guidelines (n = 1179) and (ii) a subgroup of these women without any medical characteristics that might indicate ERCD (n = 575). MethodsAssociations were analysed by multilevel logistic regression. Main outcome measuresAdjusted odds ratios. ResultsAmong the 1584 women with a previous caesarean, 1179 (74.4%) were eligible for TOLAC according to guidelines (group 1); 490 (41.6%) had ERCD. Risk of ERCD increased with increasing maternal age and body mass index, pre-existing condition and suspected macrosomia and decreased with previous vaginal deliveries. Among the unit characteristics, private status (aOR = 2.3, 95% CI 1.3-4.1) and low level of care (aOR = 2.5, 95% CI 1.4-4.5]) were independently associated with a higher risk of ERCD after adjustment on patient/pregnancy characteristics. The variability of ERCD rate between hospitals was mainly (78%) explained by the status and level of care, and not (0%) by patient/pregnancy characteristics. Associations with unit characteristics were similar for group 2. ConclusionFor women eligible for TOLAC, the rate of ERCD is high and not in agreement with guidelines. Some characteristics of women are associated with ERCD, but the main determinants are at the unit level, which suggests that non-medical reasons are involved in the decision process. Tweetable abstractElective repeat caesarean in women eligible for trial of labour mainly depends on maternity unit characteristics. Tweetable abstract Elective repeat caesarean in women eligible for trial of labour mainly depends on maternity unit characteristics.
引用
收藏
页码:1664 / 1673
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Oxytocin at elective caesarean delivery: a dose-finding study in women with obesity
    Peska, E.
    Balki, M.
    Maxwell, C.
    Ye, X. Y.
    Downey, K.
    Carvalho, J. C. A.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2021, 76 (07) : 918 - 923
  • [42] Factors obstetricians, family physicians and midwives consider when counselling women about a trial of labour after caesarean and planned repeat caesarean: a qualitative descriptive study
    Christine Kurtz Landy
    Wendy Sword
    Jackie Cramp Kathnelson
    Sarah McDonald
    Anne Biringer
    Maureen Heaman
    Pam Angle
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 20
  • [43] Factors obstetricians, family physicians and midwives consider when counselling women about a trial of labour after caesarean and planned repeat caesarean: a qualitative descriptive study
    Landy, Christine Kurtz
    Sword, Wendy
    Kathnelson, Jackie Cramp
    Mcdonald, Sarah
    Biringer, Anne
    Heaman, Maureen
    Angle, Pam
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [44] Perinatal morbidity among women with a previous caesarean delivery (PRISMA trial): a cluster-randomised trial
    Chaillet, Nils
    Masse, Benoit
    Grobman, William A.
    Shorten, Allison
    Gauthier, Robert
    Rozenberg, Patrick
    Dugas, Marylene
    Pasquier, Jean-Charles
    Audibert, Francois
    Abenhaim, Haim A.
    Demers, Suzanne
    Piedboeuf, Bruno
    Fraser, William
    Gagnon, Robert
    Gagne, Guy-Paul
    Francoeur, Diane
    Girard, Isabelle
    Duperron, Louise
    Bedard, Marie-Josee
    Johri, Mira
    Dube, Eric
    Blouin, Simon
    Ducruet, Thierry
    Girard, Mario
    Bujold, Emmanuel
    LANCET, 2024, 403 (10421): : 44 - 54
  • [45] Outcomes of Trial of Labor versus Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery in Women with a Previous Cesarean Delivery
    Abdelrahman, Safinaz
    Qamaruddin, Arjumand
    Khadeer, Sara
    Al-Jufairi, Zainab
    BAHRAIN MEDICAL BULLETIN, 2022, 44 (04) : 1122 - 1128
  • [46] Use of the Atad catheter for the induction of labour in women who have had a previous Caesarean section - a case series
    Miller, TD
    Davis, G
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2005, 45 (04): : 325 - 327
  • [47] Two decision aids for mode of delivery among women with previous caesarean section: randomised controlled trial
    Montgomery, Alan A.
    Emmett, Clare L.
    Fahey, Tom
    Jones, Claire
    Ricketts, Ian
    Patel, Roshni R.
    Peters, T. M. J.
    Murphy, Deirdre J.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 334 (7607): : 1307 - 1309
  • [48] Risk of uterine rupture in women undergoing trial of labour with a history of both a caesarean section and a vaginal delivery
    Hinke de Lau
    Hendrik Gremmels
    Nico W. Schuitemaker
    Anneke Kwee
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2011, 284
  • [49] Risk of uterine rupture in women undergoing trial of labour with a history of both a caesarean section and a vaginal delivery
    de Lau, Hinke
    Gremmels, Hendrik
    Schuitemaker, Nico W.
    Kwee, Anneke
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2011, 284 (05) : 1053 - 1058
  • [50] Decision support for women choosing mode of delivery after a previous caesarean section: A developmental study
    Farnworth, A.
    Robson, S. C.
    Thomson, R. G.
    Watson, D. Burges
    Murtagh, M. J.
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2008, 71 (01) : 116 - 124