Can urine dipstick testing for urinary tract infection at point of care reduce laboratory workload?

被引:35
|
作者
Patel, HD [1 ]
Livsey, SA [1 ]
Swann, RA [1 ]
Bukhari, SS [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Leicester NHS Trust, Dept Clin Microbiol, Leicester LE1 5WW, Leics, England
关键词
D O I
10.1136/jcp.2004.025429
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Aim: The University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust microbiology laboratory receives 150 000 urine samples each year, approximately 80% of which prove to be culture negative. The aim of this study was to reduce the proportion of culture negative urines arriving in the laboratory, by producing local evidence based guidelines for the use of urine dipstick testing at point of care within the trust's three acute hospitals. Methods: One thousand and seventy six unborated urine samples were dipstick tested at the point of care using an automatic strip reader. Quantitative results for the four infection associated markers - leucocyte esterase, nitrite, blood, and protein - were compared with the results of conventional laboratory microscopy and culture. Results: The performance of different marker combinations was calculated against the routine laboratory methods. One hundred and seventy five (16.3%) samples were negative for all four markers. Of these dipstick negative samples, only three (1.7% of all true positives) were positive by culture. The absence of all four infection associated markers was found to have a greater than 98% negative predictive value and a sensitivity and specificity of 98.3% and 19.2%, respectively. Conclusions: A urinary dipstick testing algorithm for infection associated markers was derived for use in hospital patients to screen out negative urines. Two years after distributing the algorithm and promoting access to reagent strips and strip readers, a reduction in the urine workload has been seen against an otherwise increasing laboratory specimen load.
引用
收藏
页码:951 / 954
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] COST EFFECTIVE USE OF URINE SAMPLING AND DIPSTICK TESTING TO DIAGNOSE URINARY TRACT INFECTIONS IN PRE-SCHOOL CHILDREN PRESENTING TO PRIMARY CARE
    Busby, J.
    Hay, A.
    Butler, C.
    Lawton, M.
    Sterne, J.
    Little, P.
    Hood, K.
    Harman, K.
    Hollingworth, W.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (07) : A630 - A630
  • [42] Dipstick urinalysis and the accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of urinary tract infection
    Sultana, RV
    Zalstein, S
    Cameron, P
    Campbell, D
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2001, 20 (01): : 13 - 19
  • [43] Disappointing dipstick screening for urinary tract infection in hospital inpatients
    Zaman, Z
    Borremans, A
    Verhaegen, J
    Verbist, L
    Blanckaert, N
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1998, 51 (06) : 471 - 472
  • [44] Evaluation of dipstick for diagnosis of urinary tract infection in children and adults
    Aguado, IH
    Lumbreras, B
    Vioque, Y
    MEDICINA CLINICA, 2001, 117 (03): : 117 - 117
  • [45] Dipstick urinalysis and the accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of urinary tract infection
    Arya, SC
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2002, 22 (01): : 108 - 109
  • [46] DOES A POSITIVE URINE DIPSTICK OR URINE CULTURE AT THE TIME OF URODYNAMIC EVALUATION PREDICT POST-PROCEDURAL FEBRILE URINARY TRACT INFECTION?
    Lapicz, Lynne
    Canon, Stephen
    Patel, Ashay
    Zamilpa, Ismael
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (04): : E488 - E489
  • [47] How Sensitive is Urine Dipstick Analysis in Predicting Urinary Tract Infections in Symptomatic Adults in a Primary Care Setting?
    Shatla, Mokhtar
    Almisfer, Abdulrahman
    Zawawi, Shamsuldin
    Damanhouri, Baraah
    Alharthi, Fahad
    WORLD FAMILY MEDICINE, 2016, 14 (03): : 4 - 9
  • [48] LABORATORY CRITERIA OF URINARY TRACT INFECTION
    KUNIN, CM
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1969, 207 (06): : 1157 - &
  • [49] LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS OF URINARY TRACT INFECTION
    PRYLES, CV
    LUSTIK, B
    PEDIATRIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1971, 18 (01) : 233 - +
  • [50] The laboratory diagnosis of urinary tract infection
    Graham, JC
    Galloway, A
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2001, 54 (12) : 911 - 919