Effects of catheter-based renal denervation on heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:17
|
作者
Fukuta, Hidekatsu [1 ]
Goto, Toshihiko [2 ]
Wakami, Kazuaki [2 ]
Kamiya, Takeshi [3 ]
Ohte, Nobuyuki [2 ]
机构
[1] Nagoya City Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Core Lab, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[2] Nagoya City Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Cardiol, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[3] Nagoya City Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Med Innovat, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
关键词
Heart failure; Renal denervation; Sympathetic nervous system; Meta-analysis; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1007/s10741-020-09974-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Despite the major progress in the treatment of heart failure, the burden of heart failure is steadily increasing in the Western world. Heart failure is characterized by increased sympathetic activity, and chronic sympathetic activation is involved in the maintenance of the pathological state. Recent studies have shown that catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) presents a safe and minimally invasive treatment option for uncontrolled hypertension, a condition that is driven by increased sympathetic activity. Although randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have examined the effect of RDN in heart failure patients, results are inconsistent due partly to limited power with small sample sizes. We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis of RCTs on the effect of RDN in heart failure patients with reduced left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF). Electronic search identified 5 RCTs including 177 patients. In the pooled analysis, RDN increased LVEF (weighted mean difference (WMD) [95% CI] = 6.289 [1.883, 10.695]%) and 6-min walk distance (61.063 [24.313, 97.813] m) and decreased B-type natriuretic peptide levels (standardized mean difference [95% CI] = - 1.139 [- 1.824, - 0.454]) compared with control. In contrast, RDN did not significantly change estimated glomerular filtration rate (WMD [95% CI] = 5.969 [- 2.595, 14.533] ml/min/1.73 m(2)) and systolic (- 1.991 [- 15.639, 11.655] mmHg) or diastolic (- 0.003 [- 10.325, 10.320] mmHg) blood pressure compared with control. Our meta-analysis suggests that RDN may improve LV function and exercise capacity in heart failure patients with reduced EF, providing the rationale to conduct large-scale multicenter trials to confirm the observed potential benefits of RDN.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 36
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] CATHETER-BASED RENAL SYMPATETIC DENERVATION FOR RESISTANT HYPERTENSION: A META-ANALYSIS OF CLINICAL TRIALS
    Garcia, Daniel
    Macedo, Francisco Y. B.
    Benjo, Alexandre
    Aziz, Emad
    Herzog, Eyal
    De Marchena, Eduardo
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 61 (10) : E1379 - E1379
  • [22] Autonomic regulation device therapy in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Ahmed Bendary
    Mohamed Bendary
    Mohamed Salem
    Heart Failure Reviews, 2019, 24 : 245 - 254
  • [23] The most effective combination of pharmacological therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Tang, Huilin
    Germinal, Kimberly
    Milfort, Alexandra
    Chen, Wei-Han
    Chang, Shao-Hsuan
    Huang, Wenxi
    Li, Yujia
    Lu, Ying
    Ahmed, Mustafa M.
    Kimmel, Stephen E.
    Bian, Jiang
    Guo, Jingchuan
    BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [24] A Systematic Review And Meta-analysis Of The Randomized Controlled Trials Of Autonomic Neuromodulation Device Therapy For Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
    Ahmed, Mohammad
    Bussa, Rahul
    Weigel, Frank
    Nudy, Matthew
    Maheshwari, Ankit
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2023, 29 (04) : 654 - 654
  • [25] Varying effects of recommended treatments for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in the ESC and ACCF/AHA guidelines
    Thomsen, Marius Mark
    Lewinter, Christian
    Kober, Lars
    ESC HEART FAILURE, 2016, 3 (04): : 235 - 244
  • [26] Autonomic regulation device therapy in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Bendary, Ahmed
    Bendary, Mohamed
    Salem, Mohamed
    HEART FAILURE REVIEWS, 2019, 24 (02) : 245 - 254
  • [27] Effects of Catheter-Based Renal Denervation in Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Vukadinovic, Davor
    Lauder, Lucas
    Kandzari, David E.
    Bhatt, Deepak L.
    Kirtane, Ajay J.
    Edelman, Elazer R.
    Schmieder, Roland E.
    Azizi, Michel
    Boehm, Michael
    Mahfoud, Felix
    CIRCULATION, 2024, 150 (20) : 1599 - 1611
  • [28] Pharmacotherapies in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Baral, Nischit
    Gautam, Swotantra
    Yadav, Saroj A.
    Poudel, Sangeeta
    Adhikari, Govinda
    Rauniyar, Rohit
    Savarapu, Pramod
    Katel, Anjan
    Paudel, Anish C.
    Parajuli, Prem R.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (02)
  • [29] CATHETER ABLATION VERSUS MEDICAL THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH ATRIAL FIBRILLATION AND HEART FAILURE WITH REDUCED EJECTION FRACTION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS
    Pasqualotto, Eric
    Ternes, Caique M. P.
    Ferreira, Rafael
    Chavez, Matheus Pedrotti
    Oliveira, Gustavo
    Nienkotter, Thiago
    Bertoli, Edmundo
    Clemente, Mariana
    Balieiro, Caroline
    Wippel, Catherine Wegner
    D'Avila, Andre
    Rohde, Luis
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 83 (13) : 389 - 389
  • [30] Catheter ablation versus conventional treatment of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    David F. Briceño
    Timothy M. Markman
    Florentino Lupercio
    Jorge Romero
    Jackson J. Liang
    Pedro A. Villablanca
    Edo Y. Birati
    Fermin C. Garcia
    Luigi Di Biase
    Andrea Natale
    Francis E. Marchlinski
    Pasquale Santangeli
    Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2018, 53 : 19 - 29