What is the functional outcome for the upper limb after stroke?

被引:31
|
作者
Williams, BK
Galea, MP
Winter, AT
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Alfred Hosp, Melbourne, Vic 3181, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Caulfield Gen Med Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
来源
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY | 2001年 / 47卷 / 01期
关键词
arm; cerebrovascular disorders; hemiplegia; outcome assessment (health care);
D O I
10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60295-6
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
The Motor Assessment Scale (MAS) and the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) are commonly used in Australian rehabilitation centres but there have been few systematic studies using them to measure recovery after stroke, especially with regard to upper limb function. The aims of this study were to provide a profile of upper limb recovery in a non-surgical stroke population using measures of impairment and disability. The records of 153 subjects were audited for upper limb MAS sub-scores, the FIM sub-score for upper body dressing, and the total FIM score at admission and discharge from rehabilitation. Significant improvement occurred for all outcome measures. There was no relationship between the MAS scores and the functional task of upper body dressing. The results emphasize the importance of using outcome measures that assess both impairment and disability, and indicate that substantial improvements in upper limb function frequently occur after stroke. Although the MAS has limitations, it is a valuable tool for measuring upper limb outcome after stroke because it provides a more accurate profile of true upper limb recovery than the FIM.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 27
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fast Outcome Categorization of the Upper Limb After Stroke
    Jordan, Harry T.
    Che, Joia
    Byblow, Winston D.
    Stinear, Cathy M.
    [J]. STROKE, 2022, 53 (02) : 578 - 585
  • [2] External validation and extension of the Early Prediction of Functional Outcome after Stroke (EPOS) prediction model for upper limb outcome 3 months after stroke
    Veerbeek, Janne M.
    Pohl, Johannes
    Luft, Andreas R.
    Held, Jeremia P. O.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (08):
  • [3] Accuracy and Reliability of Remote Categorization of Upper Limb Outcome After Stroke
    Jordan, Harry T.
    Stinear, Cathy M.
    [J]. NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2024, 38 (03) : 167 - 175
  • [4] Quantitative measures of functional upper limb movement in persons after stroke
    Knorr, B
    Hughes, R
    Sherrill, D
    Stein, J
    Akay, M
    Bonato, P
    [J]. 2005 2ND INTERNATINOAL IEEE/EMBS CONFERENCE ON NEURAL ENGINEERING, 2005, : 252 - 255
  • [5] What influences therapists' treatment choices for rehabilitation of upper limb after stroke?
    Kilbride, C.
    Kemp, C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2023, 18 (01) : 123 - 123
  • [6] Upper limb function and functional independence in patients with shoulder pain after stroke
    Nickel, Renato
    Lange, Marcos
    Stoffel, Diane Priscila
    Navarro, Elaine Janeczko
    Zetola, Viviane F.
    [J]. ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA, 2017, 75 (02) : 103 - 106
  • [7] Convolutional neural network in upper limb functional motion analysis after stroke
    Szczesna, Agnieszka
    Blaszczyszyn, Monika
    Kawala-Sterniuk, Aleksandra
    [J]. PEERJ, 2020, 8
  • [8] Development of a standardised multidisciplinary upper limb assessment proforma to improve functional upper limb outcome measures in the acute stroke unit setting
    Moloney, S.
    Lucas, N.
    Cormican, A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2018, 13 : 28 - 28
  • [9] Unilateral Versus Bilateral Upper Limb Training After Stroke The Upper Limb Training After Stroke Clinical Trial
    van Delden, A. E. Q.
    Peper, C. E.
    Nienhuys, Kirsten N.
    Zijp, Nienke I.
    Beek, Peter J.
    Kwakkel, Gert
    [J]. STROKE, 2013, 44 (09) : 2613 - 2616
  • [10] Upper Limb Function as an Outcome Predictor in Acute Stroke
    Corea, Francesco
    Scarponi, Federico
    Zampolini, Mauro
    [J]. STROKE, 2010, 41 (07) : E466 - E466