Effect of gamma irradiation on anti nutritional factors and nutritional value of canola meal for broiler chickens

被引:16
|
作者
Gharaghani, Hossein [1 ]
Zaghari, Mojtaba [1 ]
Shahhosseini, Gholamreza [1 ]
Moravej, Hossein [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran, Dept Anim Sci, Karaj, Iran
来源
关键词
canola meal; gamma irradiation; performance; glucosinolate; erucic acid; chickens;
D O I
10.5713/ajas.2008.80066
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Two completely randomized block design experiments were conducted to evaluate the effect of gamma irradiation processing of canola mcal on performance parameters of broiler chicks (Ross 308) and protein quality of canola meal. Protein efficiency, ratio (PER) and net protein ratio (NPR) were measured as indices of canola meal protein quality. Samples of canola meal were tested for nutritional value after being irradiated at dose levels 10, 20 and 30 kGy. Glucosinolate content was reduced 40, 70 and 89 percent at irradiation dose levels of 10, 20 and 30 kGy respectively (p < 0.01). Percent of erucic acid in total fatty acid content increased 44.58 and 48% as a function of radiation dose (p < 0.01). Dose levels did not affect feed conversion ratio (FCR) and body weight gain of chicks (p > 0.05). Liver weight was decreased by irradiation dose (p < 0.05). The same trend was observed for kidney weights, but this trend was not significant (p > 0.05). Gamma irradiation processing of canola meal had no significant effect on T-3 level in blood of chickens that consumed canola meal, but T-4 level of chicken blood at the 30 kGy dose decreased significantly (p < 0.05). PER and NPR were not affected by radiation dose level (p > 0.05). Gamma irradiation seems to be it good procedure to improve the nutritional quality of canola meal.
引用
收藏
页码:1479 / 1485
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Use of Canola meal in diets for broiler chickens
    do Nascimento, AH
    Gomes, PC
    Rostagno, HS
    Albino, LFT
    Gomes, MFM
    Runho, RC
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA-BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1998, 27 (06): : 1168 - 1176
  • [22] Enhancing the nutritive value of canola meal for broiler chickens through enzymatic modifications
    Niu, Yanxing
    Rogiewicz, Anna
    Patterson, Rob
    Slominski, Bogdan A.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2023, 101
  • [23] Effect of Gamma, Electron Beam and Infrared Radiation Treatment on the Nutritional Value and Anti-Nutritional Factors of Sorghum Grain
    Rousta, M.
    Sadeghi, A. A.
    Shawrang, P.
    Afshar, M. Aimn
    Chamani, M.
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2014, 4 (04): : 723 - 731
  • [24] Nutritional value of poultry litter ash fed to broiler chickens
    Blake, J. P.
    Hess, J. B.
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2005, 84 : 63 - 63
  • [25] NUTRITIONAL-VALUE OF WAXY BARLEYS FOR BROILER-CHICKENS
    MOSS, BR
    ELNEGOUMY, AM
    NEWMAN, CW
    ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1983, 8 (01) : 25 - 34
  • [26] Nutritional value of green seaweed (Ulva lactuca) for broiler chickens
    Abudabos, Alaeldein M.
    Okab, Aly B.
    Aljumaah, Riyadh S.
    Samara, Emad M.
    Abdoun, Kalid A.
    Al-Haidary, Ahmad A.
    ITALIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2013, 12 (02) : 177 - 181
  • [27] The Yeast Fermentation Effect on Content of Bioactive, Nutritional and Anti-Nutritional Factors in Rapeseed Meal
    Vlassa, Mihaela
    Filip, Miuta
    Taranu, Ionelia
    Marin, Daniela
    Untea, Arabela Elena
    Ropota, Mariana
    Dragomir, Catalin
    Saracila, Mihaela
    FOODS, 2022, 11 (19)
  • [28] Evaluation of the nutritional value of seaweed products for broiler chickens' nutrition
    Stokvis, L.
    van Krimpen, M. M.
    Kwakkel, R. P.
    Bikker, P.
    ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 280
  • [29] Utilizing pretreatment and fungal incubation to enhance the nutritional value of canola meal
    Croat, J. R.
    Karki, B.
    Berhow, M.
    Iten, L.
    Muthukumarappan, K.
    Gibbons, W. R.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2017, 123 (02) : 362 - 371
  • [30] Nutritional characteristics of camelina meal for 3-week-old broiler chickens
    Pekel, A. Y.
    Kim, J. I.
    Chapple, C.
    Adeola, O.
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2015, 94 (03) : 371 - 378