The second to fourth digit ratio and variation in the androgen receptor gene

被引:275
|
作者
Manning, JT [1 ]
Bundred, PE
Newton, DJ
Flanagan, BF
机构
[1] Univ Cent Lancashire, Dept Psychol, Preston PR1 2HE, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Liverpool, Dept Primary Care, Liverpool L69 3BX, Merseyside, England
[3] Univ Liverpool, Dept Immunol, Liverpool L69 3BX, Merseyside, England
关键词
2D : 4D; androgen receptor;
D O I
10.1016/S1090-5138(03)00052-7
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The second to fourth digit ratio (2D:4D) is sexually dimorphic, with lower mean values in males compared to females. It has been suggested that the sex difference in MAD is determined prenatally, MAD is negatively related to prenatal testosterone and positively to prenatal oestrogen, and that MAD is a marker for levels of sex steroids during brain organisation. There is growing evidence that many sex-dependent behaviours are correlated with 2D:4D. However, there is no direct evidence for an effect of prenatal sex steroids on the digit ratio. The response to prenatal testosterone is dependent on the amount produced and the foetal sensitivity to the hormone. Variation in the X-linked androgen receptor gene (AR) determines sensitivity to testosterone. Alleles of AR with low numbers of CAG triplets respond to testosterone with high transactivational activity, while high numbers of CAG's are associated with increased insensitivity to testosterone. We show in a sample of 50 men (49 Caucasian subjects, 1 Caucasian/Chinese subject) that 2D:4D is a phenotypic correlate of AR structure. Right-hand MAD was positively correlated with CAG number and individuals with low 2D:4D in their right hand compared to left hand had AR alleles with low CAG numbers. We discuss the implications of our findings for our understanding of the aetiology of 2D:4D, its relationships with sex-dependent behaviours, and the evolutionary implications of variation in 2D:4D and AR. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 405
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Severity of Premenstrual Symptoms Predicted by Second to Fourth Digit Ratio
    Kaneoke, Yoshiki
    Donishi, Tomohiro
    Iwahara, Akihiko
    Shimokawa, Toshio
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2017, 4
  • [32] Second to fourth digit ratio: a predictor of adult penile length
    Choi, In Ho
    Kim, Khae Hawn
    Jung, Han
    Yoon, Sang Jin
    Kim, Soo Woong
    Kim, Tae Beom
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2011, 13 (05) : 710 - 714
  • [33] Second to fourth digit ratio and the sporting success of sumo wrestlers
    Tamiya, Rie
    Lee, Sun Youn
    Ohtake, Fumio
    EVOLUTION AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2012, 33 (02) : 130 - 136
  • [34] Second to fourth digit ratio: A predictor of disease in later life?
    Muller, David C.
    MATURITAS, 2013, 75 (01) : 1 - 2
  • [35] Second-to-fourth digit ratio and facial shape in boys: the lower the digit ratio, the more robust the face
    Meindl, Konstanze
    Windhager, Sonja
    Wallner, Bernard
    Schaefer, Katrin
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2012, 279 (1737) : 2457 - 2463
  • [36] The Relationship Between the Risk of Prostate Cancer and Second to Fourth Digit Ratio
    Toprak, Tuncay
    Verit, Ayhan
    UROONKOLOJI BULTENI-BULLETIN OF UROONCOLOGY, 2020, 19 (01): : 31 - 34
  • [37] Second to fourth digit ratio, adult testosterone level and testosterone deficiency
    Garcia-Cruz, Eduardo
    Huguet, Jorge
    Piqueras, Marta
    Ribal, Maria J.
    Alcaraz, Antonio
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 109 (02) : 266 - 271
  • [38] Spatial navigation related to the ratio of second to fourth digit length in women
    Csathó, A
    Osváth, A
    Karádi, K
    Bicsák, T
    Manning, J
    Kállai, J
    LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2001, 13 (03) : 239 - 249
  • [39] The ratio of second to fourth digit lengths: a marker of impaired fetal growth?
    Ronalds, G
    Phillips, DIW
    Godfrey, KM
    Manning, JT
    EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 2002, 68 (01) : 21 - 26
  • [40] Second-to-fourth digit length ratio as a measure of harm avoidance
    Jeon, Sang Won
    Yoon, Ho-Kyoung
    Han, Changsu
    Ko, Young-Hoon
    Kim, Yong-Ku
    Won, You Joon
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2016, 97 : 30 - 34