The second to fourth digit ratio and variation in the androgen receptor gene

被引:275
|
作者
Manning, JT [1 ]
Bundred, PE
Newton, DJ
Flanagan, BF
机构
[1] Univ Cent Lancashire, Dept Psychol, Preston PR1 2HE, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Liverpool, Dept Primary Care, Liverpool L69 3BX, Merseyside, England
[3] Univ Liverpool, Dept Immunol, Liverpool L69 3BX, Merseyside, England
关键词
2D : 4D; androgen receptor;
D O I
10.1016/S1090-5138(03)00052-7
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The second to fourth digit ratio (2D:4D) is sexually dimorphic, with lower mean values in males compared to females. It has been suggested that the sex difference in MAD is determined prenatally, MAD is negatively related to prenatal testosterone and positively to prenatal oestrogen, and that MAD is a marker for levels of sex steroids during brain organisation. There is growing evidence that many sex-dependent behaviours are correlated with 2D:4D. However, there is no direct evidence for an effect of prenatal sex steroids on the digit ratio. The response to prenatal testosterone is dependent on the amount produced and the foetal sensitivity to the hormone. Variation in the X-linked androgen receptor gene (AR) determines sensitivity to testosterone. Alleles of AR with low numbers of CAG triplets respond to testosterone with high transactivational activity, while high numbers of CAG's are associated with increased insensitivity to testosterone. We show in a sample of 50 men (49 Caucasian subjects, 1 Caucasian/Chinese subject) that 2D:4D is a phenotypic correlate of AR structure. Right-hand MAD was positively correlated with CAG number and individuals with low 2D:4D in their right hand compared to left hand had AR alleles with low CAG numbers. We discuss the implications of our findings for our understanding of the aetiology of 2D:4D, its relationships with sex-dependent behaviours, and the evolutionary implications of variation in 2D:4D and AR. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 405
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Second to fourth digit ratio in female patients with acne vulgaris: Could it be a predictor of androgen receptor status?
    Farag, Azza Gaber Antar
    Shoiab, Mohamed Ahmed
    Samaka, Rehab
    Abdou, Asmaa Gaber
    Elnaidany, Nada Farag
    Mansour, Asmhan Omar M.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY VENEREOLOGY & LEPROLOGY, 2019, 85 (06): : 590 - 596
  • [2] The second to fourth digit ratio and asymmetry
    Manning, John T.
    Fink, Bernhard
    Neave, Nick
    Szwed, Anita
    ANNALS OF HUMAN BIOLOGY, 2006, 33 (04) : 480 - 492
  • [3] Second to fourth digit ratio and face shape
    Fink, B
    Grammer, K
    Mitteroecker, P
    Gunz, P
    Schaefer, K
    Bookstein, FL
    Manning, JT
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2005, 272 (1576) : 1995 - 2001
  • [4] Second to fourth digit ratio and cooperative behavior
    Millet, K
    Dewitte, S
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 71 (01) : 111 - 115
  • [5] The Second to Fourth Digit Ratio in Acne Vulgaris
    Unal, Mehmet
    Unal, Gulbahar Urun
    Balevi, Sukru
    Tol, Huseyin
    Uyar, Mehmet
    PEDIATRIC DERMATOLOGY, 2015, 32 (05) : 651 - 655
  • [6] Second to fourth digit ratio and facial asymmetry
    Fink, B
    Manning, JT
    Neave, N
    Grammer, K
    EVOLUTION AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2004, 25 (02) : 125 - 132
  • [7] Second to fourth digit ratio and sensation seeking
    Fink, Bernhard
    Neave, Nick
    Laughton, Katharine
    Manning, John T.
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2006, 41 (07) : 1253 - 1262
  • [8] The second to fourth digit ratio, sociosexuality, and offspring sex ratio
    Fink, B
    Manning, JT
    Neave, N
    BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 2005, 28 (02) : 283 - +
  • [9] Aggression, Digit Ratio and Variation in Androgen Receptor and Monoamine Oxidase A Genes in Men
    Peter L. Hurd
    Kathryn L. Vaillancourt
    Natalie L. Dinsdale
    Behavior Genetics, 2011, 41 : 543 - 556
  • [10] Aggression, Digit Ratio and Variation in Androgen Receptor and Monoamine Oxidase A Genes in Men
    Hurd, Peter L.
    Vaillancourt, Kathryn L.
    Dinsdale, Natalie L.
    BEHAVIOR GENETICS, 2011, 41 (04) : 543 - 556