The Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device in Severe Refractory Cardiogenic Shock

被引:230
|
作者
Kar, Biswajit [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Gregoric, Igor D. [1 ,2 ]
Basra, Sukhdeep S. [3 ]
Idelchik, Gary M. [1 ,2 ]
Loyalka, Pranav [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] St Lukes Episcopal Hosp, Texas Heart Inst, Div Cardiol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] St Lukes Episcopal Hosp, Texas Heart Inst, Div Cardiothorac Surg, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Michael E Debakey VA Med Ctr, Houston, TX USA
关键词
assist devices; cardiomyopathy; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; heart failure; myocardial infarction; shock; ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; INTRAAORTIC BALLOON COUNTERPULSATION; CARDIOPULMONARY-RESUSCITATION; TRIAL REGISTRY; EARLY REVASCULARIZATION; SURVIVAL; SUPPORT; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacc.2010.08.613
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives We evaluated the efficacy and safety of the percutaneous ventricular assist device (pVAD) in patients in severe refractory cardiogenic shock (SRCS) despite intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) and/or high-dose vasopressor support. Background SRCS is associated with substantial mortality despite IABP counterpulsation. Until recently, there was no rapid, minimally invasive means of providing increased hemodynamic support in SRCS. Methods A total of 117 patients with SRCS implanted with TandemHeart pVAD (CardiacAssist, Inc., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania) were studied, of whom 56 patients (47.9%) underwent active cardiopulmonary resuscitation immediately before or at the time of implantation. Data was collected regarding clinical characteristics, hemodynamics, and laboratory values. Results Eighty patients had ischemic and 37 patients had nonischemic cardiomyopathy. The average duration of support was 5.8 +/- 4.75 days. After implantation, the cardiac index improved from median 0.52 (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.8) l/(min center dot m(2)) to 3.0 (IQR: 0.9) l/(min center dot m(2)) (p < 0.001). The systolic blood pressure and mixed venous oxygen saturation increased from 75 (IQR: 15) mm Hg to 100 (IQR: 15) mm Hg (p < 0.001) and 49 (IQR: 11.5) to 69.3 (IQR: 10) (p < 0.001), respectively. The urine output increased from 70.7 (IQR: 70) ml/day to 1,200 (IQR: 1,620) ml/day (p < 0.001). The pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, lactic acid level, and creatinine level decreased, respectively, from 31.53 +/- 10.2 mm Hg to 17.29 +/- 10.82 mm Hg (p < 0.001), 24.5 (IQR: 74.25) mg/dl to 11 (IQR: 92) mg/dl (p < 0.001), and 1.5 (IQR: 0.95) mg/dl to 1.2 (IQR: 0.9) mg/dl (p = 0.009). The mortality rates at 30 days and 6 months were 40.2% and 45.3%, respectively. Conclusions The pVAD rapidly reversed the terminal hemodynamic compromise seen in patients with SRCS refractory to IABP and vasopressor support. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57:688-96) (C) 2011 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
引用
收藏
页码:688 / 696
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Percutaneous Transcatheter Closure of the Aortic Valve to Treat Cardiogenic Shock in a Left Ventricular Assist Device Patient With Severe Aortic Insufficiency
    Russo, Mark J.
    Freed, Benjamin H.
    Jeevanandam, Valluvan
    Hashmi, Mohammad
    Paul, Jonathan D.
    Anderson, Allen
    Lang, Roberto M.
    Shah, Atman P.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2012, 94 (03): : 985 - 988
  • [42] Adverse Event Profile Associated with Prolonged Use of CentriMag Ventricular Assist Device for Refractory Cardiogenic Shock
    Cevasco, Marisa R.
    Li, Boyangzi
    Han, Jiho
    Chiuzan, Codruta
    Mauro, Christine M.
    Kurlansky, Paul
    Garan, A. Reshad
    Takeda, Koji
    Naka, Yoshifumi
    Takayama, Hiroo
    [J]. ASAIO JOURNAL, 2019, 65 (08) : 806 - 811
  • [43] Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Refractory Cardiogenic Shock Before Left Ventricular Assist Device Surgery
    Vallabhajosyula, Saraschandra
    Arora, Shilpkumar
    Lahewala, Sopan
    Kumar, Varun
    Shantha, Ghanshyam P. S.
    Jentzer, Jacob C.
    Stulak, John M.
    Gersh, Bernard J.
    Gulati, Rajiv
    Rihal, Charanjit S.
    Prasad, Abhiram
    Deshmukh, Abhishek J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2018, 7 (22):
  • [44] Use of a Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device For High-Risk Cardiac Interventions and Cardiogenic Shock
    Thomas, Joseph L.
    Al-Ameri, Hazim
    Economides, Christina
    Shareghi, Shahrzad
    Abad, Damian Grovas
    Mayeda, Guy
    Burstein, Steven
    Shavelle, David M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 22 (08): : 360 - 364
  • [45] Outcome of patients with non-ischaemic cardiogenic shock supported by percutaneous left ventricular assist device
    Haurand, Jean M.
    Haberkorn, Sandra
    Haschemi, Jafer
    Oehler, Daniel
    Aubin, Hug
    Akhyari, Payam
    Boeken, Udo
    Kelm, Malte
    Westenfeld, Ralf
    Horn, Patrick
    [J]. ESC HEART FAILURE, 2021, 8 (05): : 3594 - 3602
  • [46] Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation As a Bailout Strategy for the Management of Refractory Electrical Storm and Cardiogenic Shock
    Martins, Raphael P.
    Maille, Baptiste
    Bessiere, Francis
    Benali, Karim
    Guenancia, Charles
    Algalarrondo, Vincent
    Gourraud, Jean-Baptiste
    Baudinaud, Pierre
    De Chillou, Christian
    Maury, Philippe
    Sacher, Frederic
    Galand, Vincent
    [J]. CIRCULATION-ARRHYTHMIA AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 14 (10):
  • [47] Anticoagulation for Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device-Supported Cardiogenic Shock JACC Review Topic of the Week
    Vandenbriele, Christophe
    Arachchillage, Deepa J.
    Frederiks, Pascal
    Giustino, Gennaro
    Gorog, Diana A.
    Gramegna, Mario
    Janssens, Stefan
    Meyns, Bart
    Polzin, Amin
    Scandroglio, Mara
    Schrage, Benedikt
    Stone, Gregg W.
    Tavazzi, Guido
    Vanassche, Thomas
    Vranckx, Pascal
    Westermann, Dirk
    Price, Susanna
    Chieffo, Alaide
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 79 (19) : 1949 - 1962
  • [48] The role of Impella percutaneous left ventricular assist device in the management of cardiogenic shock: A matter of where and when
    Tarantini, Giuseppe
    Rodino, Giulio
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2022, 99 (01) : 48 - 49
  • [49] Which Is Better: A Miniaturized Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device or Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Patients With Cardiogenic Shock?
    Chamogeorgakis, Themistokles
    Rafael, Aldo
    Shafii, Alexis E.
    Nagpal, Dave
    Pokersnik, Julie A.
    Gonzalez-Stawinski, Gonzalo V.
    [J]. ASAIO JOURNAL, 2013, 59 (06) : 607 - 611
  • [50] Use of a Micro-axial Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device (pLVAD) for Patients with Cardiogenic Shock
    Nouri, Shayan Nabavi
    Takeda, Koji
    Topkara, Veli
    Kalra, Sanjog
    Garber, Leonid
    Doshi, Darshan
    Karmpaliotis, Dimitri
    Yuzefpolskaya, Melana
    Takayama, Hiroo
    Naka, Yoshifumi
    Colombo, Paolo
    Kirtane, Ajay
    Garan, Arthur Reshad
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 68 (18) : B54 - B54