Tertiary cytoreduction for recurrent ovarian carcinoma: An updated and expanded analysis

被引:8
|
作者
Manning-Geist, Beryl L. [1 ]
Chi, Dennis S. [1 ,2 ]
Roche, Kara Long [1 ,2 ]
Zivanovic, Oliver [1 ,2 ]
Sonoda, Yukio [1 ,2 ]
Gardner, Ginger J. [1 ,2 ]
O'Cearbhaill, Roisin E. [3 ,4 ]
Abu-Rustum, Nadeem R. [1 ,2 ]
Leitao, Mario M., Jr. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Gynecol Serv, Dept Surg, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Weill Cornell Med Coll, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, New York, NY USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Med, Gynecol Med Oncol Serv, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
[4] Weill Cornell Med Coll, Dept Med, New York, NY USA
关键词
Ovarian cancer; High-grade serous ovarian carcinoma; Tertiary cytoreduction; Surgery; EPITHELIAL OVARIAN; SELECTION CRITERIA; CANCER; SURGERY; MULTICENTER;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.05.015
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. We sought to describe clinicopathologic and surgical factors associated with oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing tertiary cytoreduction and to present a clinical model to identify patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) who may benefit most from tertiary cytoreduction. Methods. We retrospectively identified patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer who underwent tertiary cytoreduction at our institution from 1/1/1990-1/1/2019. Kaplan Meier curves were used to estimate survival and compared using the log-rank test. Cox-proportional hazards regression was used to detect variables associated with survival. Results. Of 114 patients who met inclusion criteria, 79 (69.2%) had high-grade serous tumors. Of patients with available genetic testing (n = 66), 22 (33%) harbored germline or somatic BRCA mutations. Fifty-eight women (50.9%) died of disease. Complete gross resection (CGR) at tertiary cytoreduction, treatment-free interval (TFI), and platinum sensitivity were all significantly associated with disease-specific survival (DSS) and maintained significance on multivariate analysis (HR 3.71, 95% CI: 1.59-8.70; HR 0.49, 95% CI: 0.28-0.85; and HR 2.94, 95% CI: 1.22-7.07, respectively). Postoperative treatment was not associated with a survival difference. Patients with HGSOC and a single site of recurrence who were >_2 years from secondary cytoreduction had the longest survival after tertiary cytoreduction (median DSS, 79.5 months). Conclusions. Proper patient selection for tertiary cytoreduction is essential. Those who achieve CGR likely derive the greatest benefit from tertiary surgery. Platinum sensitivity and prolonged TFI are also associated with improved DSS. Patients with HGSOC and single-site recurrence who were >_2 years out from secondary cytoreduction had the longest DSS. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:345 / 352
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Secondary cytoreduction for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer
    Díaz-Montes T.P.
    Bristow R.E.
    Current Oncology Reports, 2005, 7 (6) : 451 - 458
  • [22] Beyond Quaternary Cytoreduction for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer
    Bodog, Alin
    Bacalbasa, Nicolae
    Balescu, Irina
    Dima, Simona
    Suciu, Ionut
    Ionescu, Olivia
    Suciu, Nicolae
    Tomescu, Dana
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH CONGRESS OF THE ROMANIAN SOCIETY FOR MINIMAL INVASIVE SURGERY IN GINECOLOGY / ANNUAL DAYS OF THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR MOTHER AND CHILD HEALTH ALESSANDRESCU-RUSESCU, 2019, : 55 - 59
  • [23] Secondary Surgical Cytoreduction for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer
    Coleman, Robert L.
    Spirtos, Nick M.
    Enserro, Danielle
    Herzog, Thomas J.
    Sabbatini, Paul
    Armstrong, Deborah K.
    Kim, Jae-Weon
    Park, Sang-Yoon
    Kim, Byoung-Gie
    Nam, Joo-Hyun
    Fujiwara, Keiichi
    Walker, Joan L.
    Casey, Ann C.
    Secord, Angeles Alvarez
    Rubin, Steve
    Chan, John K.
    DiSilvestro, Paul
    Davidson, Susan A.
    Cohn, David E.
    Tewari, Krishnansu S.
    Basen-Engquist, Karen
    Huang, Helen Q.
    Brady, Mark F.
    Mannel, Robert S.
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2020, 75 (03) : 165 - 166
  • [24] Surgical cytoreduction in recurrent ovarian carcinoma in patients with complete response to paclitaxel-platinum
    Gronlund, B
    Lundvall, L
    Christensen, IJ
    Knudsen, JB
    Hogdall, C
    EJSO, 2005, 31 (01): : 67 - 73
  • [25] Secondary Surgical Cytoreduction for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer
    Paulino, Eduardo
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2020, 382 (07): : 685 - 686
  • [26] Surgical cytoreduction for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer
    Al Rawahi, Thuria
    Lopes, Alberto D.
    Bristow, Robert E.
    Bryant, Andrew
    Elattar, Ahmed
    Chattopadhyay, Supratik
    Galaal, Khadra
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2013, (02):
  • [27] SURGICAL TECHNIQUES FOR DIAPHRAGMATIC RESECTION DURING CYTOREDUCTION IN ADVANCED OR RECURRENT OVARIAN CARCINOMA: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Bogani, G.
    Ditto, A.
    Chiappa, V.
    Martinelli, F.
    Donfrancesco, C.
    Di Donato, V.
    Lorusso, D.
    Raspagliesi, F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2015, 25 (09) : 408 - 409
  • [28] Surgical Techniques for Diaphragmatic Resection During Cytoreduction in Advanced or Recurrent Ovarian Carcinoma A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Bogani, Giorgio
    Ditto, Antonino
    Martinelli, Fabio
    Lorusso, Domenica
    Chiappa, Valentina
    Donfrancesco, Cristina
    Di Donato, Violante
    Indini, Alice
    Aletti, Giovanni
    Raspagliesi, Francesco
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2016, 26 (02) : 371 - 380
  • [29] Secondary cytoreduction surgery for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer
    Farghaly, SA
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 100 (06): : 1359 - 1360
  • [30] Cardiophrenic lymph nodes resection as part of cytoreduction for primary or recurrent ovarian carcinoma: A cohort study
    Lopes, A.
    Costa, R. L. R.
    Santos, M. O.
    Calheiros, Y.
    Anton, C.
    Sartorelli, V.
    Lima, J. A., Jr.
    Kanashiro, Y. M.
    Navarro Filho, A. C. B.
    Pinto, G. L. S.
    di Paula, R. P.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 149 : 95 - 96