A semi-quantitative approach to GMO risk-benefit analysis

被引:11
|
作者
Morris, E. Jane [1 ]
机构
[1] African Ctr Gene Technol, ZA-0040 Lynnwood Ridge, South Africa
关键词
Genetically modified organisms; Risk assessment; Risk-benefit; Regulation; RAPID IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ASSESSMENT MATRIX RIAM; RELEASE; CROPS; RICE; ENVIRONMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s11248-010-9480-8
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In many countries there are increasing calls for the benefits of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) to be considered as well as the risks, and for a risk-benefit analysis to form an integral part of GMO regulatory frameworks. This trend represents a shift away from the strict emphasis on risks, which is encapsulated in the Precautionary Principle that forms the basis for the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, and which is reflected in the national legislation of many countries. The introduction of risk-benefit analysis of GMOs would be facilitated if clear methodologies were available to support the analysis. Up to now, methodologies for risk-benefit analysis that would be applicable to the introduction of GMOs have not been well defined. This paper describes a relatively simple semi-quantitative methodology that could be easily applied as a decision support tool, giving particular consideration to the needs of regulators in developing countries where there are limited resources and experience. The application of the methodology is demonstrated using the release of an insect resistant maize variety in South Africa as a case study. The applicability of the method in the South African regulatory system is also discussed, as an example of what might be involved in introducing changes into an existing regulatory process.
引用
收藏
页码:1055 / 1071
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] RISK-BENEFIT ANALYSIS AND THE DETERMINATION OF ACCEPTABLE RISK
    DARDIS, R
    DAVENPORT, G
    KURIN, J
    MARR, J
    JOURNAL OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, 1983, 17 (01) : 38 - 56
  • [32] RISK-BENEFIT
    MCCLUNG, N
    JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND CHILDHOOD SCHIZOPHRENIA, 1978, 8 (01): : 107 - 108
  • [33] RISK-BENEFIT
    MARTIN, J
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1979, 174 (07) : 691 - 691
  • [34] Prostate Biopsy: A Risk-Benefit Analysis
    Loeb, Stacy
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (03): : 852 - 853
  • [35] Best Practices in Risk-Benefit Analysis
    Verhagen, H.
    Tijhuis, M.
    Gunnlaugsdottir, H.
    Kalogeras, N.
    Leino, O.
    Lutejin, J.
    Magnusson, S.
    Odekerken, G.
    Pohjola, M.
    Tuomisto, J.
    Ueland, O.
    White, B.
    Holm, F.
    ANNALS OF NUTRITION AND METABOLISM, 2011, 58 : 415 - 415
  • [36] NEW ANTIMALARIALS - A RISK-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
    NOSTEN, F
    PRICE, RN
    DRUG SAFETY, 1995, 12 (04) : 264 - 273
  • [37] Risk-Benefit Analysis of Bariatric Surgery
    Ludwig, Kaja
    Schneider-Koriath, Sylke
    Bernhardt, Joern
    Huettl, Thomas P.
    VISZERALMEDIZIN, 2010, 26 (01): : 21 - 25
  • [38] Losing the balance in risk-benefit analysis
    Rehani, Madan M.
    JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION, 2023, 43 (02)
  • [39] THE ILEOANAL POUCH - A RISK-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
    KOHLER, L
    TROIDL, H
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1995, 82 (04) : 443 - 447
  • [40] BRAFO -: Risk-benefit analysis of foods
    Boobis, Alan
    Contor, Laura
    Kind, Paul
    Mueller, Detlef
    Rechkemmer, Gerhard
    Verhagen, Hans
    Szoradi, Andras
    ANNALS OF NUTRITION AND METABOLISM, 2007, 51 : 393 - 394