Techno-Economic Evaluation of Novel Hybrid Biomass and Electricity-Based Ethanol Fuel Production

被引:11
|
作者
Melin, Kristian [1 ]
Nieminen, Harri [2 ]
Klueh, Daniel [3 ]
Laari, Arto [2 ]
Koiranen, Tuomas [1 ]
Gaderer, Matthias [3 ]
机构
[1] LUT Univ, LUT Sch Engn Sci, Lahti Campus, Lahti, Finland
[2] LUT Univ, LUT Sch Engn Sci, Lappeenranta Campus, Lappeenranta, Finland
[3] Tech Univ Munich, Campus Straubing Biotechnol & Sustainabil, Professorship Regenerat Energy Syst, Straubing, Germany
关键词
hybrid; biomass; eletrofuels; ethanol; techno-economic analysis; power-to-fuel; biomass-to-fuel; ACETIC-ACID HYDROGENATION; SYNTHETIC BIOFUELS; WATER; GAS; GASIFICATION; ELECTROLYSIS; MANUFACTURE; CONVERSION; RESIDUES; MODEL;
D O I
10.3389/fenrg.2022.796104
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
In order to limit climate change, fast greenhouse gas reductions are required already before 2030. Ethanol commonly produced by fermentation of sugars derived either from starch-based raw material such as corn, or lignocellulosic biomass is an established fuel decarbonizing the transport sector. We present a novel selective and flexible process concept for the production of ethanol with electricity and lignocellulosic biomass as main inputs. The process consists of several consecutive steps. First synthesis gas from gasification of biomass is purified by filtration and reforming and fed to methanol synthesis. The produced methanol is fed to acetic acid synthesis, together with a carbon monoxide-rich stream separated from the synthesis gas by membranes. Finally, acetic acid is hydrogenated to yield ethanol. With the exception of acetic acid hydrogenation, the overall process consists of technically mature subprocesses. Each process step was modelled in Aspen Plus to generate the mass and energy balances for the overall process. Additionally, the CO2 emissions and economic feasibility were assessed. Three separate cases were investigated. In the first two cases, the syngas carbon (CO and CO2) was split between methanol and acetic acid synthesis. The cases included either allothermal (case A) or electrically heated reforming (case B). In case C, maximum amount of CO was sent to acetic acid synthesis to maximize the acetic acid output, requiring a small additional carbon dioxide input to methanol synthesis. In all cases, additional hydrogen to methanol synthesis was provided by water electrolysis. Each case was designed at biomass input of 27.9 MW and the electrolyzer electricity requirement between 36 and 43.5 MW, depending on the case. The overall energy efficiency was calculated at 53-57%, and carbon efficiencies were above 90%. The lowest levelized cost of ethanol was 0.65 euro/l, at biomass cost of 20 euro/MWh and electricity cost of 45 euro/MWh and production scale of approximately 42 kt ethanol per year. The levelized cost is competitive with the current biological route for lignocellulosic ethanol production. The ethanol price is very sensitive to the electricity cost, varying from 0.56 to 0.74 euro/l at +/- 30% variation in electricity cost.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Decentralization of sustainable aviation fuel production in Brazil through Biomass-to-Liquids routes: A techno-economic and environmental evaluation
    Guimaraes, Henrique Real
    Bressanin, Jessica Marcon
    Motta, Ingrid Lopes
    Chagas, Mateus Ferreira
    Klein, Bruno Colling
    Bonomi, Antonio
    Maciel Filho, Rubens
    Watanabe, Marcos Djun Barbosa
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 276
  • [32] Techno-economic analysis of biomass-to-liquids production based on gasification scenarios
    Swanson, Ryan M.
    Platon, Alexandru
    Satrio, Justinus A.
    Brown, Robert C.
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2009, 238
  • [33] Mapping the environmental and techno-economic potential of biojet fuel production from biomass residues in Brazil
    Cervi, Walter Rossi
    Lamparelli, Rubens Augusto Camargo
    Gallo, Bruna Cristina
    de Oliveira Bordonal, Ricardo
    Seabra, Joaquim Eugenio Abel
    Junginger, Martin
    van der Hilst, Floor
    [J]. BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2021, 15 (01): : 282 - 304
  • [34] The Techno-Economic Basis for Coproduct Manufacturing To Enable Hydrocarbon Fuel Production from Lignocellulosic Biomass
    Biddy, Mary J.
    Davis, Ryan
    Humbird, David
    Tao, Ling
    Dowe, Nancy
    Guarnieri, Michael T.
    Linger, Jeffrey G.
    Karp, Eric M.
    Salvachua, Davinia
    Vardon, Derek R.
    Beckham, Gregg T.
    [J]. ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2016, 4 (06): : 3196 - 3211
  • [35] Techno-economic optimization of plant for raw ethanol production based on experimental data
    Jacimovic, Branislav M.
    Genic, Srbislav B.
    Budimir, Nikola J.
    Jaric, Marko S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER, 2014, 79 : 639 - 646
  • [36] "Drop-in" fuel production from biomass: Critical review on techno-economic feasibility and sustainability
    Kargbo, Hannah
    Harris, Jonathan Stuart
    Phan, Anh N.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2021, 135
  • [37] Techno-economic sustainability assessment for bio-hydrogen production based on hybrid blend of biomass: A simulation study
    Rizvi, Syed Muhammad Mustafa
    Kazmi, Bilal
    Taqvi, Syed Ali Ammar
    Khan, Mahwish Mobeen
    Zabiri, Haslinda
    Qadir, Danial
    Metwally, Ahmed Sayed M.
    [J]. FUEL, 2023, 347
  • [38] Techno-economic evaluation of biomass-to-synthesis gas (BtS) based on gasification
    Gao, Wei
    Wang, Shaohui
    Li, De-Xun
    Liu, Jia-Bao
    Farahini, Mohammad Reza
    Huo, Yuhong
    Imran, Muhammad
    Doranehgard, Mohammad
    [J]. ENERGY SOURCES PART B-ECONOMICS PLANNING AND POLICY, 2018, 13 (02) : 83 - 90
  • [39] Conceptualization and techno-economic evaluation of microgrid based on PV/Biomass in Indian scenario
    Singh, Arashdeep
    Basak, Prasenjit
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 317
  • [40] Production of chemicals from biomass: Techno-economic and market perspectives
    Biddy, Mary
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2017, 254