Optimal acetabular component orientation estimated using edge-loading and impingement risk in patients with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty

被引:32
|
作者
Mellon, Stephen J. [1 ]
Grammatopoulos, George [1 ]
Andersen, Michael S. [2 ]
Pandit, Hemant G. [1 ]
Gill, Harinderjit S. [1 ,3 ]
Murray, David W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Orthopaed Rheumatol & Musculoskelet, Oxford OX1 2JD, England
[2] Aalborg Univ, Dept Mech & Mfg Engn, Aalborg, Denmark
[3] Univ Bath, Dept Mech Engn, Bath BA2 7AY, Avon, England
关键词
Hip; Metal-on-metal; Impingement; Edge-loading; Kinematics; ION LEVELS; CUP IMPINGEMENT; EARLY FAILURE; FEMORAL-NECK; REPLACEMENT; WEAR; PSEUDOTUMORS; MOTION; RANGE; ABDUCTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.11.027
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
Edge-loading in patients with metal-on-metal resurfaced hips can cause high serum metal ion levels, the development of soft-tissue reactions local to the joint called pseudotumours and ultimately, failure of the implant. Primary edge-loading is where contact between the femoral and acetabular components occurs at the edge/rim of the acetabular component whereas impingement of the femoral neck on the acetabular component's edge causes secondary or contrecoup edge-loading. Although the relationship between the orientation of the acetabular component and primary edge-loading has been identified, the contribution of acetabular component orientation to impingement and secondary edge-loading is less clear. Our aim was to estimate the optimal acetabular component orientation for 16 metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty (MoMHRA) subjects with known serum metal ion levels. Data from motion analysis, subject-specific musculoskeletal modelling and Computed Tomography (CT) measurements were used to calculate the dynamic contact patch to rim (CPR) distance and impingement risk for 3416 different acetabular component orientations during gait, sit-to-stand, stair descent and static standing. For each subject, safe zones free from impingement and edge-loading (CPR < 10%) were defined and, consequently, an optimal acetabular component orientation was determined (mean inclination 39.7 degrees (SD 6.6 degrees) mean anteversion 14.9 degrees (SD 9.0 degrees)). The results of this study suggest that the optimal acetabular component orientation can be determined from a patient's motion and anatomy. However, 'safe' zones of acetabular component orientation associated with reduced risk of dislocation and pseudotumour are also associated with a reduced risk of edge-loading and impingement. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:318 / 323
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] In vivo evaluation of edge-loading in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing patients with pseudotumours
    Kwon, Y-M.
    Mellon, S. J.
    Monk, P.
    Murray, D. W.
    Gill, H. S.
    [J]. BONE & JOINT RESEARCH, 2012, 1 (04): : 42 - 49
  • [2] The effect of motion patterns on edge-loading of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing
    Mellon, S. J.
    Kwon, Y. -M.
    Glyn-Jones, S.
    Murray, D. W.
    Gill, H. S.
    [J]. MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2011, 33 (10) : 1212 - 1220
  • [3] Poor Acetabular Component Orientation Increases Revision Risk in Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty
    Tauriainen, Tuomas J. T.
    Niinimaki, Tuukka T.
    Niinimaki, Jaakko L.
    Nousiainen, Tomi O. P.
    Leppilahti, Juhana I.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2017, 32 (07): : 2204 - 2207
  • [4] Individual motion patterns during gait and sit-to-stand contribute to edge-loading risk in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing
    Mellon, Stephen J.
    Grammatopoulos, George
    Andersen, Michael S.
    Pegg, Elise C.
    Pandit, Hemant G.
    Murray, David W.
    Gill, Harinderjit S.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART H-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE, 2013, 227 (07) : 799 - 810
  • [5] Benefits of Thin-Shelled Acetabular Components for Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty
    Le Duff, Michel J.
    Wang, Chen Ti
    Wisk, Lauren E.
    Takamura, Kohtaroh B.
    Amstutz, Harlan C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2010, 28 (12) : 1665 - 1670
  • [6] Is a cementless fixation of the femoral component suitable for metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty?
    Amstutz, Harlan C.
    Le Duff, Michel J.
    [J]. HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 29 (06) : 624 - 629
  • [7] A Safe Zone for Acetabular Component Position in Metal-On-Metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty: Winner of the 2012 HAP PAUL Award
    Liu, Fei
    Gross, Thomas P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2013, 28 (07): : 1224 - 1230
  • [8] Correlation between inclination of the acetabular component and metal ion levels in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing replacement
    De Haan, R.
    Pattyn, C.
    Gill, H. S.
    Murray, D. W.
    Campbell, P. A.
    De Smet, K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2008, 90B (10): : 1291 - 1297
  • [9] Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing The Effect of Cup Position and Component Size on Range of Motion to Impingement
    Williams, Dan
    Royle, Matt
    Norton, Mark
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2009, 24 (01): : 144 - 151
  • [10] Migration pattern of a cobalt-chrome monoblock acetabular component after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing
    Roda, Richard
    Whittingham-Jones, Paul M.
    Lee, Joshua
    Ryu, Jae-Jin
    Beaule, Paul E.
    [J]. HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 26 (03) : 220 - 225