Bringing people (back) into risk analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Seno-Alday, Sandra [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sch Business, Discipline Int Business, Rm 4107 Abercrombie Bldg, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
Human factors; people; risk analysis; HUMAN ERROR; PERCEIVED RISK; CLIMATE-CHANGE; PERCEPTION; FIREFIGHTERS; SIMILARITIES; CONSUMPTION; MANAGEMENT; SECURITY; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1080/13669877.2018.1517386
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This paper explores the different ways in which people (i.e. human factors) have been incorporated in extant studies of risk. A preliminary scan of the literature shows that people are not just passive maleficiaries of risk but are also active participants in its inception. People are actors whose biases and behaviors give rise to risk and make an impact on both the degree of its likelihood and the severity of its consequences. Because people themselves undertake risk analysis (either as experts and/or stakeholders), the risk analysis process itself is subject to biases and human error. Therefore, it is argued that human factors must be explicitly brought into risk conceptualization, analysis, and theory development in order to enrich and extend the frontiers of the field. Scholarly contributions by members of the Society for Risk Analysis Australia and New Zealand (SRA-ANZ) investigating the challenges and complexities of incorporating people in risk analysis are introduced in this issue.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:1069 / 1076
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条