Automated confidence ranked classification of randomized controlled trial articles: an aid to evidence-based medicine

被引:33
|
作者
Cohen, Aaron M. [1 ]
Smalheiser, Neil R. [2 ]
McDonagh, Marian S. [1 ]
Yu, Clement [3 ]
Adams, Clive E. [4 ]
Davis, John M. [2 ]
Yu, Philip S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Med Informat & Clin Epidemiol, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Psychiat, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Dept Comp Sci, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[4] Univ Nottingham, Div Psychiat, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Support Vector Machines; Natural Language Processing; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Evidence-Based Medicine; Systematic Reviews; Information Retrieval; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; RETRIEVAL; WORKLOAD; MEDLINE; UPDATE;
D O I
10.1093/jamia/ocu025
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Objective: For many literature review tasks, including systematic review (SR) and other aspects of evidence-based medicine, it is important to know whether an article describes a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Current manual annotation is not complete or flexible enough for the SR process. In this work, highly accurate machine learning predictive models were built that include confidence predictions of whether an article is an RCT. Materials and Methods: The LibSVM classifier was used with forward selection of potential feature sets on a large human-related subset of MEDLINE to create a classification model requiring only the citation, abstract, and MeSH terms for each article. Results: The model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.973 and mean squared error of 0.013 on the held out year 2011 data. Accurate confidence estimates were confirmed on a manually reviewed set of test articles. A second model not requiring MeSH terms was also created, and performs almost as well. Discussion: Both models accurately rank and predict article RCT confidence. Using the model and the manually reviewed samples, it is estimated that about 8000 (3%) additional RCTs can be identified in MEDLINE, and that 5% of articles tagged as RCTs in Medline may not be identified. Conclusion: Retagging human-related studies with a continuously valued RCT confidence is potentially more useful for article ranking and review than a simple yes/no prediction. The automated RCT tagging tool should offer significant savings of time and effort during the process of writing SRs, and is a key component of a multistep text mining pipeline that we are building to streamline SR workflow. In addition, the model may be useful for identifying errors in MEDLINE publication types. The RCT confidence predictions described here have been made available to users as a web service with a user query form front end at: http://arrowsmith.psych.uic.edu/cgi-bin/arrowsmith_uic/RCT_Tagger.cgi.
引用
收藏
页码:707 / 717
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] AN EVIDENCE-BASED APPROACH TO TELEPHONE REASSURANCE CALLS: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL PROTOCOL
    Minyo, Morgan
    Bass, David
    McCarthy, Catherine
    Judge, Katherine
    Perkins, Fatima
    Beach, Douglas
    INNOVATION IN AGING, 2022, 6 : 839 - 840
  • [22] An Evidence-Based Practice Educational Intervention for Athletic Trainers: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Welch, Cailee E.
    Van Lunen, Bonnie L.
    Hankemeier, Dorice A.
    JOURNAL OF ATHLETIC TRAINING, 2014, 49 (02) : 210 - 219
  • [23] Evidence-Based Resilience Intervention for Nursing Students: a Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial
    Lanz J.J.
    International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology, 2020, 5 (3) : 217 - 230
  • [24] The evolution of the randomized controlled trial and its role in evidence-based decision making
    Devereaux, PJ
    Yusuf, S
    JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 254 (02) : 105 - 113
  • [25] Effectiveness of an Evidence-Based Amputee Rehabilitation Program: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
    Gailey, Robert
    Gaunaurd, Ignacio
    Raya, Michele
    Kirk-Sanchez, Neva
    Prieto-Sanchez, Luz M.
    Roach, Kathryn
    PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2020, 100 (05): : 773 - 787
  • [26] Evidence-Based Medicine in Endometriosis Surgery: Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial Versus the Consensus Opinion of Experts
    Koninckx, Philippe R.
    Ussia, Anastasia
    Zupi, Errico
    Gomel, Victor
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 24 (05) : 692 - 694
  • [27] Teaching evidence-based medicine literature searching skills to medical students during the clinical years: a randomized controlled trial
    Ilic, Dragan
    Tepper, Katrina
    Misso, Marie
    JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, 2012, 100 (03) : 190 - 196
  • [28] Effectiveness of e-learning material on essential components of evidence-based medicine among laypersons: a randomized controlled trial
    Okabayashi, Satoe
    Kitazawa, Kyoko
    Noma, Hisashi
    Takahashi, Yoshimitsu
    Iwami, Taku
    Kawamura, Takashi
    Nakayama, Takeo
    HEALTH EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2024, 39 (05) : 466 - 474
  • [29] A randomised controlled trial of a blended learning education intervention for teaching evidence-based medicine
    Dragan Ilic
    Rusli Bin Nordin
    Paul Glasziou
    Julie K Tilson
    Elmer Villanueva
    BMC Medical Education, 15
  • [30] Teaching emergency medicine residents evidence-based critical appraisal skills: A controlled trial
    Bazarian, JJ
    Davis, CO
    Spillane, LL
    Blumstein, H
    Schneider, SM
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1999, 34 (02) : 148 - 154